Top Rated Attorney Near Me
Family Law Attorney in Lake Havasu

Home | Main Page | Advertise With Us | Sitemap


Family Law Attorney in
A lot of people do not think about selecting a lawyer until they are in desperate need. The legal situation may possibly be personal, like family law, for a separation and divorce or if you are looking for a bankrupcy or trust law firm. It may be a felony circumstance you will need to be defended on. Businesses need to have legal representatives as well, whether they are being sued for discrimination, sexual harassment, or maybe unjustified business strategies. Tax law firms are also very helpful while interacting with government problems. Just like doctors, lawyers have specialties. A big, full service law firm has a number of attorneys with various areas of competence, so depending on your individual legal issue, you can immediately retain the very best lawyer to satisfy your up-to-date need without having to commence your search each time you need legal assistance.It is most effective to find a lawyer you can trust. You want one with a good track record, who ishonest, reliable, and wins cases. You really want to have assurance that they will stand for you correctly and charge you reasonably for their services. Occasionally a referral from a pal or business associate can be handy, even so you should hold your options open and examine all the firms accessible, for the reason that when you need to have legal help, you need it instantly and you really want the finest you can manage to pay for. Thank you for searching for a attorney with us. Your time is valuable, and Action Pages, at, is happy to offer you specific search parameters to meet your necessities. We constantly make the effort to focus on the most popular phrases so you can right away find anything you are searching for.

Local Time in Lake Havasu | Wikipedia Information About Lake Havasu | Google Map of Lake Havasu
Youtube Video's of Lake Havasu | Info from Wiki on Family Law Attorney

ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are, California Grover Beach | Pismo Beach | Nipomo | Arroyo Grande | San Luis Obispo | SLO | Morro Bay | Los Osos Orcutt Ojai Arizona | Lake Havasu | Kingman | Bullhead | Prescott | Payson | Show Low | Snowflake | Taylor | Flagstaff Sedona | Cottonwood | Camp Verde | Williams | Washington | Skagit | Whatcom | Bellingham | Ferndale Lynden Mount Vernon | Sedro Woolley | Burlington | Oak Harbor | Anacortes | Camano Island | Stanwood | Arlington Langley Clinton | San Juan Islands | BC | Duncan | Port Alberni | Comox | Courtney | Campbell River | Parksville | Langley Maple ridge | Chilliwack | Abbotsford | Mission | Whistler | Squamish | Sunshine Coast | Terrace | Kitimat | Smithers Prince Rupert | Prince George | Williams Lake | Quesnel | Sidney | Victoria | Alberta | Red Deer | Lloydminster | Ontario | Sudbury | Sault Ste Marie | North Bay | Timmins | Muskoka | Gravenhurst | Parry Sound | Huntsville | Kingston | Belleville | Cornwall | Brockville | Dundas | Pembroke | Renfrew | Smith Falls | Cobourg

Auto Repair | Appliances | Chiropractors | Countertops | Furnace Repairs | Insulation | Investment Advisory | Limo | Paint | Pawn shops | Family Practice doctors | rhinoplasty | Restaurants | Signs | Welding

Divorce Laws In Michigan?
Does Anyone Know If Res Judicata Is Mandatory When You Want To Marry A Divorced Person? Do We Need To Have It In Order To Marry?

Michigan Divorce Law
Divorce cases are often difficult and emotionally taxing for all parties involved. It is important to have an attorney who is sensitive to your needs, and who can formulate a plan to protect your rights and assets. Usually both parties suffer financially as a result of divorce. Watch out for an attorney who brings frequent motions, and who manufactures conflicts, for the sole purpose of justifying a larger bill. Please pick your divorce lawyer carefull
lt" Divorce Law
Michigan has enacted a no fault divorce law, pursuant to which residents of Michigan can obtain a divorce without establishing that the other party did something wrong. A trial court can grant a divorce if it finds that "There has been a breakdown in the marriage relationship to the extent that the objects of matrimony have been destroyed and there remains no reasonable likelihood that the marriage can be preserved." Please note that issues of "fault" may remain relevant to the division of the marital estate, and that aspects of "fault" may come out in the event of child custody litigation.

Jurisdictional Requirements
To file for divorce in Michigan the plaintiff must have been a resident of Michigan for at least 180 days, and must have resided in the county where the divorce complaint was filed for at least ten days prior to filing. The plaintiff can also file a divorce based upon the defendant's meeting those residency requirements. There are narrow circumstances under which the 10 day county residence period can be waived.

If you are concerned that your spouse may be filing for divorce in another state or jurisdiction, you should consult with an attorney about whether it would be appropriate for you to try to file a divorce in your own state. In many circumstances, the divorce will be decided in the state where a complaint for divorce is first filed, which can result in significant difficulty and expense to a spouse who resides in another state.

Waiting Period
Under normal circumstances, a trial court in Michigan must observe a sixty day "cooling off" period before granting a divorce. While it is possible for a trial court to find circumstances which justify waiving this period, in most cases the full waiting period will be observed. The waiting period is longer in cases involving child custody.

When "Fault" Matters
A trial court may consider "fault" issues when dividing the marital assets, or when assessing spousal support (alimony). Please note that under most "fault" circumstances, the trial court will not dramatically change the division of assets. With most marital estates, you will need to consider whether a five or ten percent difference in the property division justifies the expense and conflict associated with attempting to prove fault. There is often a better financial return in making sure that all assets are located, properly valued, and included in the marital estate, as opposed to trying to prove fault.

Division of Property
The first consideration for a court in evaluating the division of the marital estate is the determination of which portions of the estate constitute the parties' separate property, and which is part of the marital estate. By way of example, inheritances are usually considered to be the separate property of the spouse who received the inheritance. Similarly, a business or asset owned prior to the marriage may be considered to be a separate asset, depending upon how it was treated during the marriage. At times, an item of property might be deemed to be "separate property", while the appreciation or interest earned by the asset is considered to be a marital asset. At other times, a parties separate property at the onset of the marriage may be deemed to have merged into the marital estate. Also, a trial court may invade one spouse's separate property when necessary to provide for the adequate post-divorce support of the other spouse

Can Anyone Help Me To Find The Recipe For Nigella Lawsons Ultimate Chocolate Cake Please?
My Daughter Is Desparate To Try It And I Just Cant Find It Please Help!!

Chocolate Fudge Cake Recipe courtesy Nigella Lawson
Show: Nigella Bites
Episode: Comfort Food

For the cake:
2 2/3 cups all-purpose flour
3/4 cup plus 1 tablespoon granulated sugar
1/3 cup light brown sugar
1/4 cup best-quality cocoa powder
2 teaspoons baking powder
1 teaspoon baking soda
1/2 teaspoon salt
3 eggs
1/2 cup plus 2 tablespoons sour cream
1 tablespoon vanilla extract
3/4 cup unsalted butter, melted and cooled
1/2 cup corn oil
1 1/3 cups chilled water
For the fudge icing:
6 ounces bittersweet chocolate, minimum 70 percent cocoa solids
1 cup plus 2 tablespoons unsalted butter, softened
1 3/4 cups confectioners' sugar, sifted
1 tablespoon vanilla extract

For the cake:
Preheat the oven to 350 degrees F. Butter and line the bottom of 2 (8-inch) cake pans.
In a large bowl, mix together the flour, sugars, cocoa, baking powder, baking soda and salt. In another bowl or wide-necked measuring cup whisk together the eggs, sour cream and vanilla until blended. Using a standing or handheld electric mixer, beat together the melted butter and corn oil until just blended (you'll need another large bowl for this is using the hand mixer; the standing mixer comes with its own bowl), then beat in the water. Add the dry ingredients all at once and mix together on a slow speed. Add the egg mixture, and mix again until everything is blended and then pour into the prepared tins. And actually, you could easily do this manually; I just like my toys and find the stand mixer a comforting presence in itself.

Bake the cakes for 45 to 50 minutes, or until a cake-tester comes out clean. Cool the cakes in their pans on a wire rack for 15 minutes, and then turn the cakes out on the rack to cool completely.

For the icing:
Melt the chocolate in the microwave - 2 to 3 minutes on medium should do it - or in a bowl sitting over a pan of simmering water, and let cool slightly.

In another bowl beat the butter until it's soft and creamy (again, I use the stand mixer here) and then add the sifted confectioners' sugar and beat again until everything's light and fluffy. I know sifting is a pain, the 1 job in the kitchen I really hate, but you have to do it or the icing will be unsoothingly lumpy. Then gently add the vanilla and chocolate and mix together until everything is glossy and smooth.

Sandwich the middle of the cake with about a quarter of the icing, and then ice the top and sides, too, spreading and smoothing with a rubber spatula.

What Would Be The Ethical Things For A Defense Lawyer To Do In The Following Situation?
A Defense Lawyer Is Defending Someone Accused Of A Violent Crime Such As Rape, Murder, Or Assault, And The Lawyer Knows The Client Is Guilty Because The Client Confessed To Him Or He Has Access To Evidence That Clearly Shows The Client Is Guitly. Is It Unethical For The Lawyer To Try To Get The Client Declared &Quot;Not Guilty&Quot; So He Can Walk Free Unpunished, Or Is The Attorney'S Only Obligation To His Client? Or Does The Attorney Have A Moral And Ethical Obligation To Society To Insure The Guilty Party Is Punished? What Is The Bigger Purpose: Defending The Client Or Defending Society?

Look at it this way: If the prosecution doesn't have enough evidence to convict a person, and that person has exercised his right to remain silent when speaking to the police, should the authorities be able to lay a charge with the expectation that the accused will talk to his lawyer, and expect that they'll be able to rely on those statements to the lawyer in court?

It completely undermines the right to remain silent and the right to counsel, if your statements to your lawyer are fair game for making out a case against you.

That said, such knowledge isn't without a consequence. If an accused confesses to his lawyer, that lawyer's duty to the court prevents him from being able to adduce evidence of things he knows not to be true. Thus, alibi evidence is off the table, evidence that somebody else is the guilty party is off the table...basically, any evidence that the accused is innocent cannot be adduced, because the defence lawyer would be knowingly misleading the court, and thus violating his duty.

Still, the lawyer still has a duty to challenge the prosecution's case against the accused. If the prosecution doesn't have the witnesses and/or physical evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the court cannot convict, and it's the defence lawyer's duty to see that the court realizes that it cannot convict.

It it's not an admission, but physical evidence in the lawyer's possession, then other obligations kick in. A lawyer can't conceal evidence. (There are some grey areas if he intends to bring it up in court himself, but he can't just take the murder weapon and hide it away.) In Canada, at least, there's a practice trick called the 'brown bagging'. If a defendant brings you the murder weapon and tells you to deal with it (and refuses to take it away himself)...defence counsel can't just bring it to the police himself; it would be easy enough for the police to zero in on the suspect just by watching who he represents in court. Instead, defence counsel should put the object into a paper bag, retain another lawyer (thus invoking privilege with the other lawyer), and have the other lawyer bring the object to the police, telling them only that it might be relevant to some investigation.

I Need Some Consultation Regarding This Legal Situation..?
Someone I Know And His Friend, Have Been Arrested For Carrying Heroin In Their Car. This Guy I Know, Which We'Ll Call &Quot;John&Quot;. John Was Driving The Car, This Car Belongs To His Friend'S Mom. He Was Begged By His Friend To Drive Him To Pa, And Was Arrested On The Way There. Now The Mom Of John'S Friend Went John'S Girlfriend To Retrieve John'S Identification Proof Of Address And Work And She Did Not Consult John'S Mom About Actions. Can I Please Get Some Ideas About What To Do And The Reasons For Why The Friend'S Mom Took The Actions She Did, And If She Was Right Or Wrong On Doing So.

As far as I know there's no reason John's friend's mom should need this information, I would suggest not making it available to her. John needs to seek legal counsel as soon as possible about what his options are. If he is found to have not been aware that he was transporting an illegal substance he should be okay but I wouldn't give out any information unless his attorney advises it's okay. In either case, legal counsel should be his first step because they can walk him through everything he'll need to know. He should make sure to ask as many questions as possible about his options. Best of luck!

How To Find A Good Divorce Attorney In North Carolina?
My Husband Left Me And My 3 Year Old Son. I Am 4 Months Pregnant. He Said He Still Wants Some Custody Though Over Our Children. How Do You Know Which Attorney'S Are Good And Which Are Not? I Live In Nc. Thanks So Much.

When there is a child involved, and in your case one on the way, check with the North Carolina Bar Association. They should be able to refer you to a good attorney, and one that won't cost you and arm and a leg. Good Luck

State Of Wa Maternity/Family Leave Laws?
I Just Found Out I'M 6 Weeks Pregnant! Yeah! However, I Just Started A New Job In Vancouver, Wa And I Won'T Be Covered Under Fmla. How Do I Interpret The State Laws Here? What Am I Legally Entitled To Take In This State? I Work Here But Live In Oregon.

I live in Seattle, Washington

The federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) permits workers who work for an employer with 50 or more employees and have worked at least 12 months for the business for a total of at least 1,250 hours to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for:

a newborn or newly adopted or foster child,
to recover from the employee's own serious illness, or
to care for a child, spouse, or parent with a serious health condition.
For questions about the federal FMLA, call the U.S. Department of Labor at 1-866-487-9243 or see the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 fact sheet.

By time you have the baby you will have been there for a year. You will qualify, you don't fake FMLA until after you have the baby. You will be 9 months pregnant. How long have you been at your job?