4 Ways To Help Your Lawyer Enable You To When you really need a legal professional for any reason, you must work closely using them in order to win your case. Regardless how competent they are, they're gonna need your help. Here are four important ways to help your legal team help you win: 1. Be Totally Honest And Up Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - irrespective of what information you're likely to reveal in their mind. Privilege means everything you say is stored in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team must know everything in advance - particularly information other side could learn about and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep a continuous and factual account of all the information regarding your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys with all the data they should help them to win. 3. Appear Early For All Those Engagements Do not be late when you're appearing before a court and get away from wasting the attorney's time, too, because they are promptly, each and every time. In reality, because you may want to discuss eleventh hour details or be extra ready for the truth you're facing, it's smart to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate Which You Have Your Act Together If you've been arrested for any type of crime, it's important so as to prove to the legal court that you both regret the actions and therefore are making strides toward increasing your life. By way of example, if you're facing driving under the influence, volunteer for any rehab program. Be sincere and linked to the neighborhood the judge is presiding over. Working more closely together with your legal team increases your likelihood of absolute success. Try this advice, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you should win your case.
Local Time in Lake Havasu |
Wikipedia Information About Lake Havasu |
Google Map of Lake Havasu
Youtube Video's of Lake Havasu |
Info from Wiki on Injury
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Dentists | Cabinets | Chimney cleaning | Fence | Funeral Homes | Insulation | Lawn mowing | Massage | Mattresses | Paintball | Allergy asthma doctors | tummy tuck | Railings | Skin care clinics | Veterinarians
Question About Lonestar Legal Aid?
I Am Low Income And Need To Take Legal Action.What Services Do Lonestar Legal Aid In Texas Offer?Is It Affordable For Low Income People?
Lonestar Legal Aid is one of 3 legal aid services in Texas. Lonestar serves mainly east Texas.
They handle only civil law cases, they are probibited from taking fee generating cases or criminal cases.
You basically apply for their services, they will verify you qualify based on your income, and then within a few weeks they will determine wether or not to take your case. Legal Aid services get hundreds of applications a week and just do not have the resources to help everyone.
Lone Star Legal Aid is at www.lonestarlegal.org they should have monthly clinics throughout the counties they serve.
Business Law Question On Due Process..Please Help!?
11. A Law Is Passed That Bans “The Wearing Of Such Outlandish Clothing That It Causes A Public Distraction.” Most Likely, This Law Would Be Challenged On The Basis Of:
A. Substantive Due Process
B. Procedural Due Process
C. Commerce Clause
D. Equal Protection
I Think The Answer Is Either A Or D..
A, Because Substantive Due Process Says That Law Should Be Clear And Not Overly Broad..
Or D, Because It Says That Everyone Should Be Protected Equally..
Im Confused, Please Help!
Due process says that law should be clear and not overly broad
The 14th Amendment has several clauses which are applied in different ways
Under substantive due process it is:
"No State shall deprive a citizen of LIBERTY without due process of law."
The emphasis is on liberty. When a law interferes with a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, the government must demonstrate the purpose of the law and how the law is tailored to achieving that purpose. Some rights are so fundamental that only a COMPELLING STATE INTEREST NARROWLY TAILORED to achieving that interest will survive. This is called STRICT SCRUTINY. Strict scrutiny is STRICT IN THEORY FATAL IN FACT, which means that it will almost never survive. e.g. a law that restricts someone's right to vote.
Procedural due process is
"No STATE shall DEPRIVE a citizen of LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY without DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
First it must be a state or government action. If the actor is a private company, there is no Procedural due process claim. Next there must be a deprivation, which means that some sort of entitlement must be taken away. If one was not entitled to it to begin with, there is no violation. Next it must be a deprivation of life or limb, liberty, or property or property interest. Finally, insufficient process to challenge the deprivation must have occured. e.g. A welfare board determines that a family no longer qualifies for section 8 housing and evicts them from their home without warning.
The Commerce clause does not deal with the 14th amendment, but Article I of the Constitution. It give congress the power to regulate commerce between the many states. In this case it is the Federal government, and the action must affect commerce between the states or have an AGGREGATE EFFECT on commerce. e.g. cultivation of marijuanna for medical use affects illicit marijuanna use throughout the country. Additionally, a state cannot pass laws which SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH INTERSTATE COMMERCE. This is known as the dormant commerce clause.
Equal Protection is
"No State shall deprive a citizen...of EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS." In this case, there is a classification of two distinct groups which are SIMILARLY SITUATED. One is disadvantaged. Again, a state or the federal government must demonstrate the purpose of the law and how that law is tailored to achieving that end. First, you must ask, does the law make a classification? If so, is that classification based on gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, status as an illegitimate child, or alien? When the classification is based on one of the above except gender, the government must show that the classification was based on a COMPELLING STATE INTEREST NARROWLY TAILORED TO ACHIEVING THAT INTEREST. Once again this is strict in theory and fatal in fact. Classifications based on race, for instance will almost always fail. e.g. segregating inmates in a prison according to race because of racial gangs. When the classification is based on gender the law must be based on AN IMPORTANT GOVERMENT INTEREST CLOSELY TAILORED TO ACHIEVING THAT INTEREST. This is intermediate scrutiny. Otherwise, the law must be RATIONALLY RELATED TO ACHIEVING A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT INTEREST, which is not very hard to demonstrate, but such laws can be struck down if they are based on animus towards a group. e.g. laws that prohibit the mentally handicapped from living in a residential housing zone for no good reason would not face muster.
To answer your question:
In approaching your question, you must look to see Is there a classification? That might be people who wear outlandish clothing vs. other people. The classification is not based on gender, race or ethnicity, so not much of a challenge under equal protection. Does the law involve a fundamental right? To dress as you wish is a freedom of expression, so this could involve the 1st Amendment. It could be substantive due process, but the speech does not appear to be protected. If the clothing's purpose was political, religious, or aritistic, it may be better. Does the action affect interstate commerce? It could affect retailers of outlandishing clothing because no one would like to buy the clothing if it is illegal. Because this deals with commerce more directly, it is probably not a good challenge. Is this a State action that deprives a person of property without due process? It is a law, so it is state action, and it deprives a person of their ability to use their property. The vagueness of what "outlandish" clothing means could implicate due process. Part of due process is that you know how the laws will affect you a head of time. When the law is overly broad, it has a CHILLING EFFECT on legal behavior, because no one wants to get arrested.
If you think that a freedom of expression is implicated here, then it is (a). If you think that people are being deprived of their property rights to wear outlandish clothing, then it is (b). For this reason, (a) is a stronger answer I believe. Good attorneys would sue under a, b, and d.
Are Criminal Law, Lawyers Still Needed?
I Want To Become &Quot;A Criminal Law Lawyer&Quot;, But Are They Still Needed? What Would Be My Year Salary If I Worked In Brisbane?
Thanks In Advance :)
Nope. Criminal lawyers aren't needed anymore because everyone is going to start obeying the law from this point on.
What Kinds Of Firms Are There?
Such As Law Firm, Publishing Firm, And Accounting Firm. What Are Others?
Go to the search engine of your choice and type in "North American Industry Classification System" or "NAICS". When you do that you will get a very extensive list that classifies all of the types of business establishments.
i.e. insurance firm, construction firm, real estate firm, manufacturing firm ...
Question About Federal/Alabama State Laws?
A Friend Of Mine Was Recently Arrested In The State Of Alabama For Possession Of Alcohol By A Minor. The Police Officers Who Arrested Her And The Other 7 Who Got Arrested Did Not Arrest The People At The Party Who Were 21+, Nor Did They Arrest Anyone Under The Age Of 18 (Most Of The 40 People At The Party). They Were Not Read Their Miranda Rights, Did Not Tell Them What They Were Being Arrested For At The Time, And Did Not Give Them A Secondary Breathalyzer Upon Reaching The Police Station (The Only Reason I Mention This Is Because I Read Somewhere That In A Few States, The Handheld Breathalyzers Police Carry With Them Aren'T Very Accurate And They'Re Required To Give You Another One At The Station). They Did Not Allow Them To Have A Phone Call For 6 Hours, And The Name And Social Were Wrong On Several Pieces Of Paperwork - And Not Just By One Letter, The Entire First Name Was Wrong And My Friend Told The Officer Who Was Taking Her Info Down That It Was Wrong Several Times. One Of The Numbers On The Social Security Number Was Wrong As Well On All Of The Paperwork. This Also Happened To Another Friend Of Hers - Completely Wrong Name And Social. Is There Any Way At All They Can Fight This Case In Court? I'M Looking For Specific Laws, State Or Federal, If That'S At All Possible, But Any Advice Would Be Helpful. Thanks!
Your friend needs to hire an experience criminal defense lawyer who practices in Alabama... While these are thoughtful ideas, they are, for the most part, not relevant to defending the case. The police are given wide latitude in who they arrest and don't arrest... Also, possession focuses on did you have alcohol on you, not were u drunk. That said, let the lawyer explain it and let the lawyer determine ifthe police violated any rights of the defendant/ur friend... He/she will be able to know the questions to ask
What Are Civil And Criminal Laws?
I'M Trying To Find An Example Of A Civil Law But I Am Kinda Struggling. What Is The Main Difference Between That And Criminal Laws And, If Possible, Could You Post A Civil Law?
Criminal law is when the government brings charges against an individual because they broke a law. The government seeks to have the individual punished by making them pay a fine or serve time in jail.
Civil law is when two people sue each other, usually for money. For example, if someone sues another person for breach of contract, or an employee sues their employer for race discrimination, or a person sues their doctor for malpractice, these are all violations of civil law. In each case, the plaintiff is suing the defendant for money. No one broke a criminal law, and no one is going to jail.