4 Methods To Help Your Lawyer Help You If you want a lawyer for any excuse, you need to work closely with them so that you can win your case. Irrespective of how competent they may be, they're going to need your help. Listed here are four important strategies to help your legal team allow you to win: 1. Be Totally Honest Or Higher Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - whatever information you're planning to reveal to them. Privilege means anything you say is kept in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team needs to know all things in advance - most importantly information another side could discover and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep an ongoing and factual account of most information related to your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys because of the data they should help them win. 3. Appear Early For All Engagements Do not be late when you're appearing before a court and prevent wasting the attorney's time, too, by being on time, whenever. In reality, because you may want to discuss eleventh hour details or be extra ready for the way it is you're facing, it's smart to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate That You Have Your Act Together If you've been involved in any kind of crime, it's important so that you can convince the legal court that you both regret the actions and are making strides toward improving your life. By way of example, if you're facing driving under the influence, volunteer for any rehab program. Be sincere and associated with the city the judge is presiding over. Working more closely together with your legal team increases your chances of absolute success. Try these tips, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you ought to win your case.
Local Time in Prescott |
Wikipedia Information About Prescott |
Google Map of Prescott
Youtube Video's of Prescott |
Info from Wiki on Family Law Attorney
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Auto Repair | Apartments | Concrete | Patios | Garage doors | Health fitness | Jewelry | Massage | Opticians | Foot doctor | Womens health doctors | boob job | Printers | Tile contractors | Water heater
What Is The Lastest On The The Accident At The Dallas Area Rapid Transit Rail Line In The Deep Ellum Area ?
This Accident Happened On Friday Feb. 9, 2007
1 dead in DART rail construction accident
08:11 PM CST on Friday, February 9, 2007
From Staff Reports
A trench collapsed Friday afternoon along a DART rail line under construction in Deep Ellum, killing one worker and injuring a second, officials said.
The accident occurred around 1:30 p.m. at a work site along Malcolm X Boulevard near Elm Street. The trench collapsed on two workers who were helping reset a water line between the future Deep Ellum and Baylor stations along the planned Green Line rail tracks that will extend south from downtown, DART spokesman Morgan Lyons said.
ROBERTO M. SANCHEZ / Al Día
Dallas Fire-Rescue officers removed the body of the construction worker who was killed. Dallas Fire-Rescue spokeswoman Annette Ponce said the department's technical rescue team was called to the scene to rescue two men. Firefighters dug their way to a victim trapped under the rubble, who was pronounced dead at the scene. Another victim was pulled from the site and taken to Baylor University Medical Center in unknown condition.
Neither victim's name was released. Both men worked for a subcontractor handling utility work along the line, Mr. Lyons said.
A total of 16 fire personnel worked at the scene to extricate the victims, Ms. Ponce said.
Mr. Lyons said work along that portion of the Green Line would be shut down until OSHA officials can complete their investigation and return the site back to DART.
"We've never had a fatal accident like this on the DART rail system, going back to 1992," he said. "Our own staff will work with OSHA to investigate what happened and learn from it."
THat's the Latest I can find out.
Parenting Plan/Revoked Rights?
Hello, I Made A Big Mistake Of Listening To The Lady At The Court House. The Father Of My Child Hasnt Been Around (Physically Or Financially) Since He Was 3 Months. The Lady Said I Cant Take His Rights Away Till A Year And To File For Child Support And A Parenting Plan. Big Mistake! Come To Find Out, Its Only 6 Months And I Already Filed For Everything And We Have A Court Date At The End Of The Month.
Heres The Tricky Part: His Parents Have Always Been Involved. They Had Plans To Take My Son For A Weekend But He Was Sick So I Simply Said, I'D Rather Him Not Go Out Why Dont You Come Over? Well, They Flipped And Filed For Emergency Visits (Denied). And Then Wrote All These Insane (And Very Hurtful) Accusations.
Anyways, He Was Paying Child Support Every Other Week (Court Ordered For Every Week) And Still Hasnt Contacted Me At All! No Big Surprise. Can I Go To Court And Get His Rights Taken Away? I Know His Mother Is Only Being On His Side So She Can See My Son And She Is Paying His Child Support! He'S About To Lose His House And Car And Drinking Is More Important. Thats How I Know.
Please Dont Bash Me. We Were Together For 3 Years, My Son Wasnt Planned But He Still Left. He Also Has A New Father That Stepped In And Has Been More Than Amazing And I Dont Want My Son To Get Confused Because Of The Grandparents!
Not a great situation. First, let's talk about the grandparents. Grandparents have no legal right to the baby whatsoever. They do not have a right to visitation. They do not have a right to do anything outside of what the parents decide. That being said, I'm not sure you are gong ot be able to terminate the father's parental rights. In general, there are only a select number of reasons that rights can be terminated. They tend to be:
-Severe or chronic abuse or neglect
-Abuse or neglect of other children in the household
-Long-term mental illness or deficiency of the parent(s)
-Long-term alcohol- or drug-induced incapacity of the parent(s)
-Failure to support or maintain contact with the child
-Involuntary termination of the rights of the parent to another child
The fact that he has has paid a little child support is not going to be helpful, although you can argue that he has never had contact with the child. However, even if you do not get his rights terminated, you have a dead bang winner of an argument for being granted sole custody. With a father figur ein the picture and no contact from the biological dad, it is in the best interest of the child to not have contact with actual dad.
I'd contact an attorney on this one. The stakes are too high and you need someone on your side who knows the system.
What Is Requesting Publication Mean? After Attempts To Serve.?
Trying To Understand This Quote From My Other Collection Agency Credit Collecting Question;
&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;Service Is Something That Has To Be Done In Person Or Certified Mail (Acknowledged Receipt). If They Attempt To Serve You And Can'T They Can Request Publication.
If A Judge Decides They'Ve Made A Sufficient Effort To Get A Hold Of You He'Ll Give Them Permission To Publish The Summons For 4 Weeks Or So And Then You Will Have Been Served.&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;&Quot;
My Question About The Above Quote:
What Exactly Is Publication? Published In What? A Newspaper?
Please Explain Publication To Me Like I Am A 10 Year Old. Thank You.
Published in a newspaper, yes. Have you ever looked in the way back pages of a newspaper and seen those things in tiny print that say "LEGAL NOTICE" on the top? That's what those are. If they make a good-faith effort to mail something to you and cannot find you at your last known address of record, they will fulfill the legal requirements of serving you by instead publishing a notice in the local newspaper of that town.
In other words, yes, you CAN be sued even if you claim nobody ever sent you a summons.
If You Had A Conviction Overturned. Should You Use The Original Trial Attorney Again?
The Reason For The Guilty Verdict Pertains To How The Judge Instructed The Jurors, Not Incompetance On The Attorney'S Part.
Take a step back and anaylze your trial attorneys work product. Were you satisfied with his ability, effort? Did he object to the jury instructions that perfected your appeal and didn't waive it? If he objected to the exact issue that the appellate court overturned the conviction then he was on the ball. Do you feel that you were represented well? There are alot of questions you need to answer before you make that decision. Don't forget your trial attorney already got a first hand view of what worked and didn't work in the first trial. Getting a do over through no fault of his own is always better for the defense, however it also works out better for the presecution. Good luck.
Social Security Disability Attorneys, Are They Frauds ?
I Hired A Social Security Disability Attorney In August 2009. They Said They Would Open Up My Claim And See It Through To The End. I Have Multiple Things Wrong With Me That I'M Not Going To Discuss, However, I Believe That I Have A Fair Chance Of Getting Approved, Based On My Medical History And Work History. Now, The Attorney That I Hired Forgot To Sign Me Up In August And I Called Them And They Apologized And Filled Out The Paperwork. I Talked To The Social Security Administration And The Attorneys Didn'T Even Send Them A Medical File. I Called The Attorney And They Confirmed That They Don'T Have A Medical File For Me And They Didn'T Send For My Medical Records. I Would Like To Fire These Idiots For Breach Of Contract ( They Are Not Aggressively Pursuing The Claim And They Have Already Made Two Horrific Mistakes ). Is It Possible For Me To Terminate Them Without Oweing Them Anything ? Can They Still Be Entitled To Compensation Should I Get Approved ? Whats Your Input On This Question ? Thanks For Answering.
Disability attorneys do not do ANYTHING for you on your initial claim or your first appeal. If you get denied a second time and appeal again the case goes to an actual hearing before a judge. At this level an attorney can be beneficial (still not required though). An attorney never collects up your medical records. Social security does this at no cost to you. Social Security is required to provide a copy of your file to your attorney at their request. Your initial claim and first appeal are processed solely by social security. There is nothing for a lawyer to do. Lawyers taking a claim at this level are just hoping that you WILL be denied so that the case gets to the hearing level. By then a couple of years has gone by, so if your condition has worsened, and a judge says OK you are now disabled, the lawyer gets his percentage of a BIG backpay check.
How Do Legal Tender Laws Work?
Let'S For The Sake Of Argument, Omit Coins Out Of The Discussion.
We Can Agree All Paper Bills Are &Quot;Legal Tender&Quot; Under Us Law. Currently, All Businesses Are Allowed To Accept Alternative Forms Of Payment In Exchange For Goods And Services, As Long As They Are Non-Debt Payment.
Ok, Let'S Say Somebody Owes Me $100,000. He Wanted To Trouble Me, So He Excercises His Rights And Handles Me 100,000 One Dollar Bills. The Part Of Carrying The Weight Is Easy, The Cost Of Time To Count Them Is Not.
Can I As A Creditor, Demand He Count The Bills In Front Of Me To Prove He Has Indeed Presented 100,000 One Dollar Bills, As An Assurance Before Accepting It? After All, It'S Not That I Don'T Accept It, It'S That I Cannot Trust He Has Given Me The Full Amount In Non-Counterfeit Bills, So I Need Him To Show It To Me Before I Can Write Him A Receipt Or Let Him Get On His Way.
Is That Fair And Legal Within Legal Tender Laws?
The legal tender law just says that the Federal Reserve Bank cannot question the value of the bills you present, not that you have to accept them as payment from anybody. Similarly, a credit card or personal checks are legal tender but you are not required by law to accept them for payment.
However, in your scenario of an existing debt, once the "tender" has been made (delivering 1,000 stacks of dollar bills), he could argue that the debt is discharged. You, of course, can specify the acceptable forms of payment BEFORE the debt is incurred, or reserve the right to reject unacceptable forms, and having failed to do so, you have accepted the risk of a debtor delivering any form of legal tender. You would have the option to reject the payment if it were, for example, $100,000 worth of diamonds.
If you go into a restaurant with an American Express logo on the door, have a meal, then they reject your offer to pay with AMEX ("We only take cash"), you have the argument that the debt is discharged when you have offered legal tender as within their advertised forms of acceptable payment. They may see it differently.