Finding A Skilled Lawyer Whatever your legal needs are you will see that there are many lawyers in your town that advertise they focus on your type of case. This can make the entire process of finding one with significant amounts of experience somewhat of a challenge. However, if you follow the tips below it will be possible to limit your search to the right one out of very little time. The first task is to generate a set of the lawyers which are listed in your town that specialize in your position. While you are causeing this to be list you should only include those which you have a great vibe about depending on their advertisement. You may then narrow this list down by using a bit of time evaluating their website. There you should certainly find just how many years they are practicing plus some general specifics of their success rates. At this moment your list must have shrunken further to individuals that you simply felt had professional websites and an appropriate volume of experience. You need to then take the time to lookup independent reviews of every attorney. Make sure to read the reviews instead of just relying on their overall rating. The data inside the reviews will give you a sense of the way they interact with their clients and how much time they invest into each case that they are taking care of. Finally, it is advisable to meet up with no less than the past three lawyers who have the credentials you are interested in. This provides you with some time to really evaluate how interested they can be in representing you and the case. It is actually crucial for you to follow many of these steps to actually find a person containing the correct measure of experience to help you the ideal outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Do You Know Whom Nigella Lawson Is ?
Nigella Lucy Lawson (born 6 January 1960) is an English food writer, journalist and broadcaster. Lawson was born to Nigel Lawson, a former Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Vanessa Salmon, whose family owned the J. Lyons and Co. empire.
After graduating from the University of Oxford, Lawson started to work as a book reviewer and restaurant critic, later becoming the deputy literary editor of The Sunday Times in 1986.
She then embarked upon a career as a freelance journalist, writing for a number of newspapers and magazines.
In 1998, Lawson brought out her first cookery book, How to Eat, which sold 300,000 copies and became a bestseller. She went on to write her second book in 2000, How to be a Domestic Goddess, winning her the British Book Award for Author of The Year.
Lawson's career underwent a significant change in 2000 when she began to host her own cookery series on Channel 4, Nigella Bites, which was accompanied with another bestselling cookery book. The Nigella Bites series proved to be successful, winning Lawson a Guild of Food Writers Award, however her 2005 ITV daytime chat show was met with a negative critical reaction and was cancelled after attracting low ratings. In the United States in 2006, Lawson hosted the Food Network's Nigella Feasts, followed by a three-part BBC Two series, Nigella's Christmas Kitchen, in the United Kingdom. This led to the commissioning of Nigella Express on BBC Two in 2007. Her own cookware range, Living Kitchen, has a value of £7 million, and she has sold more than three million cookery books worldwide.
Renowned for her flirtatious manner of presenting, Lawson has been called the "queen of food porn". She is neither a trained chef nor cook, and has assumed a distinctly relaxed approach to her cooking. Lawson has demonstrated influence as a food commentator, after some products used on her shows saw their sales figures increase.
Does A Young Child Have Any Say In Divorce Proceedings?
A child can express an opinion to the Guardian Ad Litem, but only in Texas do children over the age of 12 have any specific say. You should consider bird nest custody
It’s a form of access or custody where the children stay in the former family residence and it is the parents who rotate in and out separately and on a negotiated schedule.
The children simply live at "home" and the separated or divorced parents take turns living with them there, but never at the same time.
The core element of this arrangement is that each parent maintains a separate residence where they live when it is not their turn at the "bird's nest". When one parent arrives for his/her designated time, the other vacates right away, so as to minimize or eliminate the presence of both at the same time.
At times, bird's nest access can be coupled with specified access with the other parent say, for example, for dinner one night a week.
Sometimes, this form of access or custody will end when the youngest child reaches the age of majority at which time, one parent either buys the other out of their interest, if any, in the former family residence, or it is sold and the proceeds divided pursuant to the matrimonial property regime or separation agreement.
The arrangement can be expensive as it generally requires that three separate residences be maintained, the "nest" and a separate residence for each parent.
The concept is somewhat novel and appears to have as its origin a Virginia case Lamont v Lamont.
In Canada, Greenough v Greenough was a ground-breaker case in that the Court implemented a bird's nest custody order even though it had not been asked for by either party. Justice Quinn, in Greenough stated:
"In Lamont ... the court made a bird’s nest custody arrangement in which the children (aged 3 and 5 years) remained in the home, with the mother staying in the home during the week and the father on the weekend. I think that the benefits of a bird’s nest order are best achieved where the children are able to stay in the matrimonial home, particularly if it has been the only residence that they have known....
"Time and time again I have seen cases (and this is one) where the children are being treated as Frisbees. In general, parents do not seem to appreciate the gross disruption to which children are subjected where one of the parents has frequent access. In this regard, I do not believe there must be evidence that the children are suffering before the court is free to act. To me, it is a matter of common sense. At the risk of falling prey to simplistic generalities, I am of the view that, given a choice, I do not see why anyone would select a living arrangement which involved so much movement from house to house."
The biggest hurdle is finding an attorney who works for you and not to just drain your wallet.
If you want to learn how to do all this go to Dads House in Yahoo Groups. There's an educational manual in the file section that can teach you what you need to know. The organization it came from is defunct due to attorneys that tried to take it over and make money from it.
Take the time to learn what you can and should do.
What Are The Laws And Practices Of Buddhism?
I don't think laws...is an appropriate term to use in conjunction with buddhism. Since the buddha himself said "do not believe anything you hear even if i have said it unless it agrees with your own logic and reasoning".
some practices origins:
Well buddhism is a very logical religion. A lot of the great ideas in buddhism are often lost in mystical mumbo jumbo, theres little to no mysticism in buddhism.
There has never been a religious war in the name of buddhism in all of history and buddhism is 500 years older than christianity.
It started with a man who was born of royalty. A prophet claimed that he would either be a great ruler or a powerful religious man. His father wanted the first come true so he cut him off from the world and any form of suffering. He lavished riches, women, and other things upon him but one day the prince this man - named siddhartha gautama wanted to go outside the palace. His father cleaned up the street so it too would appear wondeful as the palace did. However while he was out he saw one elderly person, one sick person, and one dead. He asked his cart driver what these things were, as he had never heard of or experienced them before.
He then realized it doens't matter who you are, all of these things happen to every person and we are all equal on this basis, no matter how much we do we will all end up the same. So he ran away and lived a life of deprevity for many years until he was just a skeleton. A woman from a local village nursed him back to health and while meditating under a bodhi tree he achieved enlightenment and then created the four noble truths that lead to the middle way.
1. Life is frought with suffering (this is the correct version of the first noble truth - it is not 'life is suffering'.
For you see we can't escape it, happiness is very fleeting. If you want a new car, to eat at your favorite resteraunt, or a new pair of shoes that can make you happy - but it's not permanent it will leave and gain you will return to a state of unhappiness wishing for something else to fill that void (this is speaking on a very general level - realize)
2. We suffer because we grasp for things
As i explained about we search for happiness outside of ourselves - hoping that some inanimate object will make us happy but it won't. Now this doesn't mean abandon all material posessions and live in a box in the woods. No, you can still take simple pleasure from these items but realize and do not delude yourself into thinking that you can always be happy with only these things or that these things will make you happy forever.
3. We can end this suffering, it is not inevitable
This perhaps sounds like a waste of a noble truth. But basically this is about hope. We are not doomed, we can save ourselves. We can realize that we already have everything we need inside of ourselves to be happy and that we can change - its never too late.
4. The way to do this is by the middle way or the eightfold path
The middle way i can best explain by goldilocks and the three bears. This porrige is too hot, this porrige is too cold - this one is just right. Live your life by just right. The eightfold path is another story of explanation - message me if you would like to know about it.
Other ideas are:
Some key ideas in buddhism are self-mastery as attained through study and meditation.
No-self, this doesn't mean you don't exist but simply that you don't only exist. It's an idea that says we need to function as a community, no person individually would survive and this is true. We all affect each other and we all need each other. We're realizing just how true this is with environmental issues and global warming. So if you hurt someone ultimately you're hurting yourself since we all need eachother and this leads to the idea of compassion and tolerance.
We all have the same potential, no one person is better than any other because ultimately we all experience four things (given that we live a long life) Birth, sickness, old age, and death - regardless of wealth, gender, race, religion, etc.
Also theres Karma, a widely misinterpreted term. This is not a physical idea or an eye for an eye. It's not if you steal something something will get stolen from you - i believe thats irony if anything. Karma is more of an internal thing, it could be compared to the christian idea of a soul. If you do something bad you're hurting yourself internally, and if you do something good it helps you
Well heres some, i think i'll stop here i gave you enough to read -.-
hope this helped!
Anyone Know A Good Tobacco Attorney Licensed In The State Of Idaho
Any attorney can work in any state if he works with a local attorney as co-counsel. If you have someone you would like to take the case, contact them and they can hook up with someone in Idaho to run your cause. We have done this in many civil suits and it's worked just fine. The big gun does all the fancy footwork, the local guy does the filing and the initial appearances until the trial. Good Luck!
Getting A Divorce & Planning To Move With My 5 Year Old Son To Europe, My Ex Will Not Agree, Any Legal Advice?
you are in a joint custody situation.
if you move with out hubby's legal consent, and take your child, you will be charged and convicted of kidnapping, and you will lose all parental custody and right to visitation. the usa and canada work very closely with interpol on abduction cases, and more are caught than vanish. if you do this and are caught, you will probably never see your child again as you will be charged and a no contact order put in place. you choose.
if you leave without your son, you will possibly still be able to have joint custody, but your child will remain with your ex and he will become at least the residential primary care giver and custodian. you would have to have a new visitation or access chedule set up in the courts based on your new circumstances, which would allow your child to visit you at specified times, travel costs being your responsibility.
the bottom line is the child has the right to stay in the area he was born in and grew up in, and holds citizenship in, as long as one of the primary care givers with joint custody lives there.
there are no other choices in your situation, unless your ex is proven guilty of abuse and neglect, and you are granted sole custody.
if you leave, you will have to reliquish custodial care of your child to your ex, and you will just have to accept the role of being the long distant parent, which is your choice you made be leaving the jurisdiction.
What Are Her Chances In Family Court?
Right Now We Have An Agreement That Has Been In Place For 3 Years. I Get Thursday Afternoon Through Sunday Morning, She Gets Sunday Morning Through Thursday Afternoon. It Was 12 Noon On Sunday But Agreed It Should Be 9 Am On Sunday Once He Started School, Which Just Began This Year.
She Wants To Change Agreement To Her Having Him Every Week And Every Other Weekend. Cutting Me Down From Every Week Nearly 50 Percent Of The Time To Only Every Other Weekend.
This Is Her Reasoning:
1) She Has No Job And Is A Stay At Home Mom So Now She Feels As If She Should Be First Choice When It Comes To Where Our Child Should Be
2) He Should Be In One House For School (Although When We First Made The Agreement, The Change On Sunday Was Suppose To Compensate For That. Plus Why Cant That House Be My House Then?)
3) She Wants Weekends With Our Son As Well, Although Sunday Is A Weekend Day If Im Not Mistaken Right? I Have Him Saturday And Return Him Sunday. We Each Get A Day!
There Was No Significant Changes Besides The Fact That She Quit Her Job. Noone Of Us Are Going To Jail, I Still Have A Job. The Times I Have Him I Am Still There For Him And Not Off Working Or In The Bars Or Anything.
I Love My Son So Very Much And I Cant Stand The Thought Of Only Seeing Him 4 Days A Month. Please Tell Me That She Wont Get Everything She Wants?
How is she paying for stuff if she quit her job? And are your houses in different school districts? This agreement that you have right now, is it court ordered or something you two agreed on by yourselves? If it's not court ordered, then you will have to go to court and try to get shared custody of your son. My brothers fiance has a son from a previous marriage and they went to court and the judge set it up to they each get the child one week at a time and then when he starts school, they will have to come back to discuss what school the child will go to because they live in two different school districts. Good luck and I hope you get to see your child more than 4 days a month.