4 Approaches To Help Your Lawyer Enable You To When you want a legal representative for any excuse, you should work closely using them to be able to win your case. Regardless of how competent these are, they're likely to need your help. Allow me to share four important ways to help your legal team help you win: 1. Be Totally Honest Or Higher Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - no matter what information you're likely to reveal in their mind. Privilege means whatever you say is kept in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team has to know everything in advance - most importantly information the other side could check out and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep a continuing and factual account of most information related to your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys with all the data they must help them win. 3. Arrive Early For All Engagements Never be late when you're appearing before a court and steer clear of wasting the attorney's time, too, by being by the due date, whenever. The truth is, because you might need to discuss last minute details or perhaps be extra prepared for the case you're facing, it's a smart idea to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate You Have Your Act Together If you've been charged with any kind of crime, it's important so as to prove to a legal court that you just both regret the actions and so are making strides toward enhancing your life. For instance, if you're facing driving under the influence, volunteer for a rehab program. Be sincere and involved with the neighborhood the judge is presiding over. Working more closely with the legal team increases your odds of absolute success. Follow these tips, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you ought to win your case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Can I File A Lawsuit/Criminal Charges?
Here'S The Situation:
I Am A High School Student At A Pretty Good Private School. I Have Been Doing An Independent Project For The Past Two Weeks Which Involves Using My Computer Everyday. My Teacher Told Me To Sit In The Lobby At A Table. My Work Space Is A Chair At A Table About 2 Feet Away From A Wall.
One Day, I Left My Computer Plugged In And Sitting On The Table While I Visited A Classroom During Break. While In The Class Room, I Hear From A Frantic Classmate That &Quot;Billy&Quot; And &Quot;Bob&Quot; (Fake Names) Had Knocked My Computer Over. I Rush Back And Find It On The Table But In A Different Position. I Tried Powering On The Machine But Notice That There Is Hard Drive Damage And Motherboard Damage. This Was Confirmed But The It Department And A Senior Administrator. Note That Those Who Knocked My Computer Did Not Tell Me Themselves. I Confronted One Who Stated That He Had Knocked My Computer Over But Did Feel That It Was Too Damaged. The Other Did Not Apologize Until A Note Of Concern Went To His Parents.
The Problem Is That The Parents Of Those Students State That They Have No Responsibility For The Damages. They Did Not Call Until 6 Days After The Incident Nor Did They Apologize. They Claim That I Should Not Have Left My Stuff There And That It Was An Accident. Total Damages Are Around 1500 Usd.
My Mom And I Are Thinking About Taking This To Court. By Now, The Issue Isn'T The Money, But A Lack Of Respect. In Addition, There Might Be Discrimintation. We Are Not As Well Off As The Other People (I Am On Financial Aid) And The Kids Are White/Jewish While I Am Asian.
If Anyone Has Any Useful Suggestions, Especially Those In Criminal Law, Please Answer.
First of all, this isn't a criminal action. There was no intent. And even if it was criminal, then all you have authority to do is report it to the police. Since neither you nor your Mom is the District Attorney, then neither of you has the authority to file criminal charges. The police aren't going to make an arrest over this, and charges will not be filed, so get the whole criminal matter stuff out of your head.
While we're on the subject of getting issues out of your head, get the discrimination angle out of there too. This was not discrimination in the least bit. And even if it was, proving it would be next to impossible. You would need a statement from them that they targeted you because of your race and intentionally destroyed the computer because of your race. Even in your own story that wasn't the case. Even you say they were "screwing around". This wasn't targeted racial discrimination, so get over yourself and quit acting like it was.
Finally, we reach the negligence issue. You do have a case for a valid lawsuit on the theory of negligence. You mom will need to file suit against the other boys and their parents for the damages to the laptop. Since the damages are only $1500, this can be filed in small claims court without the assistance of a lawyer.
What Is The Average Cost Of A Custody Attorney?
I Was Talking To My Baby'S Father About How I'M Concerned That He Doesn'T Seem To Care For Our Child, And His Parents Took That To Mean I Can'T Handle Full Custody. We Are Both Adults But Apparently His Parents Are Just Going To Decide Everything For Him, While I Meanwhile Have A Part Time Job And Have Been Doing Fantastic On My Own. I Just Don'T Want Him To Abandon My Child Like My Father Abandoned Me. Anyways, I Don'T Know What An Attorney Would Cost, Or If Any Of You Know A Way O Reduce The Cost, Thanks! I Won'T Let My Baby Get Taken From Me, No Matter The Cost.
Do you currently have legal custody? If so, relax...the father and his family would have to PROVE that you are an unfit mother. That is very difficult to do, custody orders are rarely changed without a really good reason.
In The Philippines, Can They Charge You For Driving While In The Influence Of Alcohol If You Just Had A Bottle Of Beer?
To begin with, how do law enforcers determine if drivers are driving over the legal limit here? How many cities and municipalities equip their traffic enforcers with breathalyzers, for instance?
In a country where the most popular Filipino athlete endorses its most popular beer, the drunk-driving offense of Mel Gibson seems less controversial than his vitriolic, anti-Semitic outburst at law-enforcement officials who accosted him.
But the United States government takes drunk driving very seriously. Gibson is, in fact, facing criminal charges for driving under the influence of alcohol and having an open container of liquor in his car.
Driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated (DWI) is considered a crime in every state in the US. Just to clarify though, driving after consuming alcohol is not necessarily illegal unless the person’s ability to drive is impaired, as defined by law. Driving while having an open container of liquor inside the vehicle is, however, an outright violation in certain jurisdictions, obviously in Malibu, where Gibson was arrested.
Gibson was caught speeding, and so, regardless of whether there was an open container of liquor in his car or not, he had to be tested as mandated by US laws. In the US, if the police see you driving erratically or violating traffic laws, they can automatically submit you to various tests, which determine the amount of alcohol in your blood. A blood-alcohol test by means of a "breathalyzer" and/or urine sample is expressed in terms of milligrams of alcohol per milliliters of blood, or as a percentage. (10 mg/100 ml = 0.01 g/100 g = 0.01%). I think most, if not all, US states have an illegal limit of .08%. I believe Gibson was determined to have .12 percent of alcohol in his blood.
Here in the Philippines, there are also drunk-driving ordinances in most cities, with penalties that include fines, suspension of one’s driving license and jail terms. But, as we all know, enforcement is not as strict as it is in the US.
To begin with, how do law enforcers determine if drivers are driving over the legal limit here? How many cities and municipalities equip their traffic enforcers with breathalyzers, for instance? Are they capable of conducting blood tests to determine if the driver is over the statutory amount? Or do they just rely on smelling drivers, judging their conduct, language (slurred speech, e.g.) and motor movements to determine if they are indeed drunk?
Foreigners often make comments that drunk-driving laws here are a joke. It’s also a culture thing, they say. Filipinos take pride in being able to hold their liquor. They say it seems to be a macho thing for most Filipino males to be able to drink and drive, mocking the popular admonition, "Don’t drink and drive."
Technically, there’s not even a national law against drunk driving. If I recall correctly, Senate President Manny Villar introduced a bill for the purpose when he was still chairman of the Senate finance committee. Under his bill, Villar proposed that persons found guilty for the first time of drunk driving must face a suspension of their driver’s license for one year and be made to pay a fine of P1,000. On the second offense, a fine of P5,000 and a five-year suspension of the driver’s license will be imposed. I don’t recall the bill having gone past the committee level though.
In Makati, Jejomar Binay wants to be stricter not only against drunk driving but also "drugged driving." Last year the Makati City Council passed an ordinance imposing a fine of P2,500 or imprisonment—or both—on persons who drive their vehicles while under the influence of drugs or liquor.
The city government acquired testing kits to be used in checking the blood-alcohol level of intoxicated or drugged drivers. Suspected drivers can also be taken to the Ospital ng Makati, which now conducts testing on a 24-hour basis. So Makati traffic officers don’t need to rely only on physical manifestations of being intoxicated or drugged, which might not be able to hold up in court when cases are filed against those caught red-handed. Just like in the US, the testing is mandatory if you are caught violating traffic or driving errantly.
In Makati, drivers who register a .13-percent blood alcohol level are considered unfit to drive and will be charged according to the drunk-driving ordinance. Interestingly, Gibson would not have been legally drunk in Makati. (Maybe, Filipinos really have a high tolerance for alcohol, otherwise how do you explain the more lenient standards for blood alcohol tests?)
Has the city ordinance encouraged more people in Makati to drink moderately and more responsibly? Obviously, it hasn’t put a stop to drunk driving altogether. That might be an impossible task. But even making a dent on the drunk-driving culture would take time, relentless enforcement coupled with a serious information drive.
Binay directed the Makati Police Department, the city’s Department of Public Safety and the barangays to strictly enforce the ordinance, particularly in the vicinity of Makati’s bars and entertainment establishments. Bar owners were asked to inform their clients about the ordinance against drunk driving, and its corresponding penalties.
Apparently, the advisories failed to reach former Pangasinan congressman Ranjit Shahani, who figured in a car accident in Makati some time ago. Ranjit was allegedly drunk when he rammed another car head-on. Worse, he could only present an expired student’s license (way back in 1992) to the responding officers.
This, along with many other similar incidents, only highlights the need for a strongly enforced drunk-driving law that would lead to fewer alcohol-related accidents and fatalities.
One beer wouldn't register much on the breathalyzer. They won't charge you with DUI. Unless, of course, kung napag-tripan ka lang. (you caught their ire or trip)
Does Anyone Have Any Advice On Where To Find A Good Personal Injury Attorney In The Bradenton/Sarasota Area?
Sure, personal injury law is big down here, so follow the link below to a directory and map of such lawyers here in Sarasota and Bradenton...
Looking For A Lawyer. Private Lawyer.?
I Need A Private Lawyer In The Chicago Area. Who'S Fee Will Be Based Upon My Settlement.
There is a full list of Chicago lawyers and attorneys on http://www.superphonebook.net. Just try calling a few.
Can I Write My Own Living Will, Without Legal Assistance?
I Have A Copy Of My Father'S Living Will And Want To Use That As A Guide For Writing My Own. As Long As I Get It Notarized, Is It Legally Binding? I Would Hate To Pay A Lawyer For Something I Could Do On My Own! (P.S. I Have A Child And The State I'Ll Be Living In Is Georgia.)
All a notary does is witness the signature , a notary signature does not make anything legal , You may not even need the notary all together
A living will, also called a treatment directive, is a type of advance directive that documents personal wishes about end-of-life medical treatment in case decision-making or communication abilities are lost. A living will specifies the conditions under which certain kinds of treatment or life-support measures would or would not be wanted.
A living will can be changed or revoked at any time and will not take effect until a person is no longer able to make or communicate decisions. Copies of living wills should be given to and discussed with a person's health professional and family members.
Although living wills can be written without the help of an attorney, legal advice may be useful. This is especially true for people who live in states where living wills are not recognized or the laws governing them are unclear. Many hospitals and nursing homes provide living will forms that comply with state-specific requirements.