Finding An Experienced Lawyer No matter what your legal needs are you will find that there are many lawyers in your town that advertise that they are experts in your kind of case. This can make the entire process of finding one with significant amounts of experience a bit of a challenge. However, when you follow the following it is possible to define your pursuit to the correct one out of almost no time. Step one is to generate a list of the lawyers which can be listed in your area focusing on your position. While you are causeing this to be list you ought to only include those that you may have a great vibe about depending on their advertisement. You may then narrow this list down by taking a little while evaluating their website. There you must be able to find how many years they are practicing and some general specifics of their success rates. At this moment your list ought to have shrunken further to people that you just felt had professional websites and an appropriate amount of experience. You must then take time to check out independent reviews of each attorney. Be sure to browse the reviews rather than relying upon their overall rating. The information inside the reviews provides you with a sense of how they communicate with their customers and how much time they invest into each case they are concentrating on. Finally, you will want to meet up with a minimum of the final three lawyers which have the credentials you are looking for. This will provide you with some time to really evaluate how interested they are in representing your case. It is important to follow most of these steps to actually find someone that has the right measure of experience to help you get the best possible outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
8Months Ago The Company I Worked For We Ware Lifting A Ibeam Everything Was Done By Hand Abot Eight Of Us, When We Got It High Enough They Had It On A 2X4 I Was Going To Put A Latter To Support Thats How The Guy Alway Does It..So The 2X4 Broke And The Ibeam Hit My Had Broke My Arm And Landed On My Leg..I Just Had Couple Of Stiches On My Head I Have About 8Inch Scare On My Arm Because They Had To Put A Meatl Plate, In My Leg I Have A Mettal Rod 2 Screws Around My Ankle And 2 Screws Around My Knee.Plus I Have A Scare From When The Bone Broke On My Leg It Came Out ..And Scares From The Cots The Doc Had To Do To But All The Stuff In So I Have 7 Scares 4 Screws 1 Mettal Rod 1 Mettal Plate From The Accdinet....Schould I Talk To The Adjuster Or Get A Lawer?The Reason Im Asking I Know The Adjuster Is Going Try To Keep The Price As Low As Possible And The Lawer Is Going To Take A Cut To..So Which Is Better Or Is The Same???
In your opinion, is what the adjuster offering a fair settlement for your injury? That's the decision. Treat this like any decision to sue someone--give them a chance to make things right, and if it looks like they aren't willing to make it right, then sue them to try to force them to make it right.
If the adjuster is trying to low ball you, you'll be able to tell. What has this injury cost you? If you tell the adjuster about an expense you have and he replies 'we don't pay for missed worktime' or whatever else you feel you should be compensated for, then get a lawyer--you won't beat a lawyer in court without a lawyer unless you are so obviously on the right side that any smart lawyer would have given up and settled with you. But if the WC insurance company does seem to be offering you a fair deal, don't go and hire a lawyer just to see if there is more money to be had--the lawyer will take all of that and then some. If they are being fair with you, don't make trouble and slow down their getting a check to you. If they aren't being fair with you, simply getting a lawyer forces them to negotiate with someone who knows what costs they are and are not responsible for--and if it does wind up in court, you'll need a lawyer.
Buying And Reselling, What Are The Legal Conditions On Relabeling Or Adding A Logo?
I Am Buying A Product But I Want To Re-Size It And Add My Own Type Of Logo Then Resell (This Is In Canada But Will Be Shipping Worldwide). I Was Wondering What The Legal Terms Are On This. I Would Assume That It Is Allowed. For Example: If I Buy Towels From A Factory And Label/Logo Them And Then Resell, Could I Face Any Legal Issues.
I would talk to a lawyer if I were you. I'm unsure of the laws in Canada, but I am certain that you could face a lawsuit if you were to do that in the US. Are you taking plain items and branding them with a logo? If that is the case then it might not be illegal. But if you are taking already branded items and altering them then selling them as your own you could face legal issues. Contact a lawyer or the manufacturer of the product you're redesigning. Either should be able to tell you what the legalities are in this.
Wondering If Anyone Knows Of A Lawyer In Canada That Would Be Good To Talk To About A Medical Malpractice Case. I Had A Bad Experience A Few Years Ago And Would Like It To Be Validated. My Intestines Were Perferated And Leaking For Days And Did A Bunch Of Damage Along With Destroying All My Reproductive Organs Which Were Perfectly Healthy. Three Doctors In A Row Claimed I Was Suffering From An Std, The Humiliation And Grief That Caused Alone Was Tremendous, I Have Never Had An Std. They All Just Look At The Previous Diagnosis And Ignore The Pain, Treating My Like Some Cheap Tramp That Deserves The Pain. I Have Asked For Advice From A Couple Different Lawyers And Nobody Seems To Want To Deal With It. Is That The Way It Is In Canada? It'S Not Fair, I'Ll Never Be The Same. There Should Be Some Kind Of Compensation For Thier Ignorance. Not Just Dumb Excuses That At My Age These Things Aren'T Common So They Had No Reason To Think That My Symptoms And Cries For Help Were Valid.
I think you will find it difficult - no matter what attorney you find (if you've had several unwilling to take your case it should be a sign - all cases are not winnable, no matter how much we'd like them to be). The time lapsed since your difficulties is a major hurdle.
I understand your pain - I had a friend who suffered a perforated appendix at the age of 25, and the hospital she was in waited until she'd gone septic to do an operation. Unlike you - she sued immediately - the suit went on for years and years (5, to be specific) and in the end - she received nothing.
She cannot bear children. She had expert witnesses, timely information and an excellent case as well. It doesn't always work out. You should be able to report the doctor(s) to your national/provincial medical board. I hope you filed a complaint with the hospital as well.
Here's a list of law firms specializing in medical malpractice - you may find one to consult with you at no charge:
Personal Liability Insurance?
I Have Just Started As A Manufacturers Representative. The Question I Have Should I Get Some Type Of Personal Liability Insurance To Cover Myself Even If I Am A Sole Proprietor? I Don'T Want To Get Sued By My Clients Incase Of Something Stupid May Happen Or Product Malfunction. I Know The Manufacturers I Represent Do Have Product Liability. But Want You Know Everyones Thoughts About Me Getting Personal Liability Insurance To Make Sure My Butt Is Covered.
Thanks For Your Comments.
Professional liability insurance--"errors and omissions" insurance--might be a good idea. That covers you in case you forget to do something or fail to inform your customer about something or provide misinformation that results in financial loss or injury. I recommend it.
Pre Law And Legal Studies?
Are Pre-Law And Legal Studies The Same Thing?
I am a law school graduate and have practiced law.
Pre-law and legal studies differ.
Pre-law describes an educational objective and is not a major. Law schools accept any academic major.
Legal studies is a rather recently developed major whose objective is to teach students something about the law and the legal process. Sometimes it is aimed toward the education of people who seek careers as paralegals. It is not a good major for preparation for law school as it is considered too easy by many law school admission deans and its method of instruction differs from the unique instructional method of law schools.
The best pre-law majors include history, which teaches critical reading, thinking, and writing skills which are similar to those used in the study and practice of law,
and math and engineering which teach analytical thinking and are known for their difficulty.
My Husband Is Asking For More Visitation With His Son. His Sons Mother (They Were Never Married) Will Agree To None Of His Terms. They Are Going To Court Next Month. What Sort Of Things Would Be Pertinent To His Case Vs Thing Pertinent In Custody Battles? Since The Original Arrangement, My Husband I Met, Got Married, Have A Son, Bought A House, Cover My Stepsons Health Insurance.
She Sleeps Around And Literally Has Brought My Stepson Into Bed With Her Random Boyfriends (While Still Living Under Her Parents Roof!), Uses My Stepson As A Pawn Against My Husband, Has Discussed Animosity Issues Between Her And Myself/My Husband With My Stepson (Who Is 4).
All These Things Are Important In Custody Changes, But Are They Important In Just Visitation Changes? What Sort Of Documentation Would Be Important (Reference Letters In Our Favor From Daycare Provider? Character References)?
What Sort Of Things Get Discussed During Court In Visitation Changes?
the practical impact of the visitation, including:
* the day care and/or school schedules of each child;
* the extracurricular activities of each child, and/or medical, psychological, or dental appointments requiring scheduling and transportation;
* the distance each child would travel for visitation;
* the availability of transportation to each parent and the willingness and ability of each parent to share in the obligation of transportation for the purpose of visitation;
* the work schedules of each parent;
In determining whether to grant visitation rights in establishing a specific visitation schedule, and in determining other visitation matters, the court must consider all of the following factors:
1. The prior interaction and interrelationships of the child with his/her parents, siblings, and other relatives, and with the person who requested companionship or visitation if that person is not a parent, sibling, or relative of the child;
2. The geographical location of the residence of each parent and the distance between those residences;
3. The child's and parents' available time, including, but not limited to, each parent's employment schedule, the child's school schedule, and the child's and the parents' holiday and vacation schedule;
4. The age of the child;
5. The child's adjustment to his home, school, and community;
6. If the court has interviewed the child in chambers, regarding the wishes and concerns of the child as to visitation by the parent who is not the residential parent or companionship, as to a specific visitation schedule, or as to other visitation matters, the wishes and concerns of the child, as expressed to the court;
7. The health and safety of the child;
8. The amount of time that will be available for the child to spend with siblings;
9. The mental and physical health of all parties;
10. Each parent's willingness to reschedule missed visitation and to facilitate the other parent's visitation rights;
11. In relation to visitation by a parent, whether either parent previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any criminal offense involving any act that resulted in a child being an abused child or a neglected child; whether either parent, in a case in which a child has been adjudicated an abused child or a neglected child, previously has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive or neglectful act that is the basis of the adjudication; and whether there is reason to believe that either parent has acted in a manner resulting in a child being an abused child or a neglected child;
12. Whether the person, in a case in which a child has been adjudicated an abused child or a neglected child, previously has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive or neglectful act that is the basis of the adjudication; whether either parent previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a charge domestic violence and, if so whether he/she caused physical harm to the victim in the commission of the offense; and whether there is reason to believe that the person has acted in a manner resulting in a child being an abused child or a neglected child;
13. Whether the residential parent or one of the parents subject to a shared parenting decree has continuously and willfully denied the other parent his or her right to visitation in accordance with an order of the court;
14. Whether either parent has established a residence or is planning to establish a residence outside this state;
15. Any other factor in the best interest of the child.