Many individuals do not think about choosing a law firm till they are in desperate need. The lawful problem could possibly be personal, like family law, for a separation or if you are searching for a bankrupcy or trust lawyer or attorney. It may be a felony condition you will need to be defended on. Firms need lawyers as well, regardless if they are being sued for discrimination, sexual harassment, or possibly unfounded business methods. Tax lawyers are also beneficial while coping with government challenges. Just like doctors, lawyers have areas. A sizeable, full service law firm has a number of legal professionals with various areas of abilities, so relying on your individual legal issue, you can immediately hold on to the most effective legal representative to meet your up-to-date need without having to start your search each time you need legal assistance.It is best to obtain a lawyer you can have faith in. You want one with a good record, who isfrank, productive, and wins cases. You really want to have trust that they will stand for you properly and bill you reasonably for their services. Occasionally a recommendation from a close friend or business associate can be practical, nevertheless you should continue to keep your options open and evaluate all the firms available, simply because when you need legal help, you need it instantly and you would like the finest you can afford. Thank you for searching for a lawyer with us. Your time is important, and Action Pages, at Actionyp.com, is pleased to give specific search variables to satisfy your requirements. We constantly make the effort to focus on the most popular phrases so you can right away find anything at all you are looking for.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Where Can I Find Tax Attorney?
Yes Does Hr Block And Or Othr Tax Compañías Know Just As Much As Tax Lawyer
What do you need a tax attorney for? Unless you have legal issues you should not need an attorney. H&R Block and its competitior's employees are in the business of preparing tax returns and assisting clients with audits. They do not practice law and have no reason to know what a lawyer knows. If your problem is a procedural or administrative one, I suggest finding an enrolled agent (EA) who specializes in whatever your problem it. (As an EA myself, I will admit that I have a bias, but EA's are tax specialists.)
Dupage County Business Attorneys In Chicago - Any Law Firms You Recommend?
I Have A Business That Has An Office In Dupage County, Elmhurst, Il To Be Exact. I'M Looking For Legal Counsel That Can Assist With Both Bankruptcy Law And International Business Laws. We Operate In 20 Countries Around The World And Our Office In Dupage County, Il Is Among Our Largest Branches In The World.
The Ideal Candidates Would Have Decades Of Experience Representing Both United States And Worldwide Headquartered Companies. We Do Substanstial Business In Hong Kong, Japan, China, India, Seoul Korea, Singapore, Holland, Argentina, And Numerous Other Asian And European Countries.
Bonus: If Law Firm Has Experience In Employment Immigration Matters, Business Transactions, Business Litigation, Assisting With Foreign-Based Companies In Litigation, And More.
Thanks In Advance For Your Help, Feel Free To Let Me Know If You Need Me To Elaborate On Anything. Alex
I recently worked with a law firm in Elmhurst, IL whom were a group of very qualified Dupage County Business Attorneys. We worked on licensing agreements and some investment issues and alternatives. They worked with me, and I was very encouraged by their attention to detail and diligence on getting the job done correctly. Not sure if they are the Business Attorneys you are looking for but my guess is they can definitely assist you.
How Do I Find A Pro Bono Lawyer?
My Ex-Husband Is Wanting To Terminate My Parental Rights And I Haven'T Had Contact With My Son In Over Two Years And Not By My Choice.
Because your case is not a criminal case, the court will not appoint a lawyer for you and will not help you find a lawyer; you'll have to find one yourself. There are legal aid offices in every state, many areas have organizations that put you in touch with pro bono lawyers, and some lawyers will take pro bono cases on their own.
Since I don't know where you live, I can't direct you to a local resource. But you can find one at CourtReference, the source below. First select your state, then go to the Choose a Court Resource Category box and select "Legal Aid, Lawyer Referral". That will give you a list of all the resources in your state, with statewide and multi-county resources first, then the rest alphabetically by county.
Look for resources with "legal aid" or "pro bono" or "volunteer lawyers" in their description. Click the blue link to go to the organization's website, where you will find information about what types of cases they handle, and how to contact them.
Who Creates International Law?
I See People Making Comments About America'S Involvement In Iraq Being 'Against International Law'...
I'M Curious, What Legislative Body Creates International Law, And How Is It Granted It'S Jurisdiction?
I'Ve Heard Of A World Court Sitting In The Hague, Netherlands, But I'M Not Sure How The Concept Of 'International Law' Is Created.
There Are Treaties, Trade Agreements, Non-Aggression Pacts, Etc. But I'Ve Never Heard Of A Treaty Or Agreement Of Any Kind Limiting The Us'S Involvement In Iraq.
People Also Like To Bring Up The Un Charter. Again, What Legal Strength Does This Document Hold? Is The Us Bound By This Charter Simply By Being A Member Of The Un?
According to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law : international law is defined as: a body of laws, rules, or legal principles that are based on custom, treaties, and legislation that control or affect the rights and duties of nations in relation to each other, [Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)]. which nations generally recognize as binding in their conduct towards one another. These bodies of nations make up the League of Nations, which primarily initiates these customs, treaties, and legislation through ratified treaties and conventions among themselves.
International law is directly and strongly influenced, although not made, by the writings of jurists and publicists, by instructions to diplomatic agents, by important conventions even when they are not ratified, and by arbitral awards. The decisions of the International Court of Justice and of certain national courts, such as prize courts, are considered by some theorists to be a part of international law. In many modern states, international law is by custom or statute regarded as part of national (or, as it is usually called, municipal) law. In addition, municipal courts will, if possible, interpret municipal law so as to give effect to international law.
The inadequacy of the League of Nations, particularly after World War I and II, and of such idealistic renunciations of war as the Kellogg-Briand Pact, led to the formation of the United Nations as a body capable of compelling obedience to international law and maintaining peace. After World War II, a notable advance in international law was the definition and punishment of war crimes. Attempts at a general codification of international law, however, proceeded slowly under the International Law Commission established in 1947 by the United Nations.
The nuclear age and the space age have led to new developments in international law. The basis of space law was developed in the 1960s under United Nations auspices. Treaties have been signed mandating the internationalization of outer space (1967) and other celestial bodies (1979).
The 1963 limited test ban treaty (see disarmament, nuclear) prohibited nuclear tests in the atmosphere, in outer space, and underwater. The nuclear nonproliferation treaty (1968) attempted to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. The agreements of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, signed by the United States and the USSR in 1972, limited defensive and offensive weapon systems. This was first of many international arms treaties signed between the two nations until the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Other treaties have covered the internationalization of Antarctica (1959), narcotic interdiction (1961), satellite communications (1963), and terrorism (1973). The Law of the Sea (1983) clarified the status of territorial waters and the exploitation of the seabed. Environmental issues have led to a number of international treaties, including agreements covering fisheries (1958), endangered species (1973), global warming and biodiversity (1992).
Since the signing of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947, there have been numerous international trade agreements. The European Union (prior to 1993, the European Community) has made moves toward the establishment of a regional legal system; in 1988 a Court of First Instance was established to serve as a court of original jurisdiction on certain economic matters.
The establishment of the International Criminal Court (2002), with jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and related matters, marked a major step forward in international law despite the United States' repudiation of the treaty under President George W. Bush.
I included the above explanations to show you that International Law is an evolutionary process to meet changing world needs and challenges.
The United States is a member of the League of Nations. "Comments about America's involvement in Iraq being 'against international law'..." means that the majority of nations in the League of Nations did not agree to America's involvement in Iraq.
Nevertheless, the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a multinational force officially began on March 20, 2003. U.S. President George W. Bush stated that the objective of the invasion was "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people".
Prior to the invasion, the United States' official position was that Iraq was in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding weapons of mass destruction and had to be disarmed by force. The United Kingdom and United States attempted to get a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing military force, but withdrew it before it could come to a vote after France, Russia, and later China all signaled that they would use their Security Council veto power against any resolution that would include an ultimatum allowing the use of force against Iraq. On March 20, 2003, the invasion of Iraq began.
The United Nations Charter is the treaty which forms and establishes the international organization called The United Nations. While this document is often misconstrued as a constitution it is, in fact, an agreement between states and not a compact among the individual peoples to create a government. It was signed at the United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco on June 26, 1945 by 50 of the 51 original member countries (Poland, the other original member, which was not represented at the Conference, signed it later). It entered into force on October 24, 1945, after being ratified by the five permanent members of the Security Council—the Republic of China (later replaced by People's Republic of China), France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (later replaced by the Russian Federation), the United Kingdom, and the United States—and a majority of the other signatories.
As a Charter it is a constituent treaty, and all members are bound by its articles. Furthermore, the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other treaty obligations . Most countries in the world have now ratified the Charter. Though one notable exception is the Holy See, which has chosen to remain a permanent observer state and therefore is not a full signatory to the Charter. All nations that belong to The League of Nations, governed by the United Nations Charter are bound by this charter simply be being a member of it.
A Good Lawyer ?
Does Anyone Live In Nyc Know A Lawyer They Can Recommend? I Need Someone To Review My Settlement And Resolve Some Questions/Concerns I Have. Thanks.
If money is an issue here, look in the yellow pages for a Paralegal. He is just as good as the attorney for a whole lot less. The Paralegal does the attys footwork anyway and actually knows most cases better than the atty does himself, and can answer all questions you have. If youre still bent on spending big bucks for an attorney then from my experience contact a local college with a law dept and look for a newly graduated law student as these guys are money hungry and definitely wanting to make a name for themselves so theyll bend over backwards for you and will go the extra mile to win their first case. Trust me. Good luck
14 Year Old Girl Seeking Legal Advice Regarding Parental Custody?
Hi, I Am A Fourteen Year Old Girl Living In Oregon, And A Few Months Ago My Parents Told Me That They Were Getting A Divorce. My Mother Is Emotionally Abusive And Unstable And Constantly Cries Whenever I Tell Her That I Do Not Wish To Spend My Time With Her. She Has, In The Past, Been In A Physically Abusive Relationship, Where She Gave Birth To Two Sons, My Half-Brothers. Then, She Met My Father, Who Is Sweet, Caring, Kind, And Is A Member Of A Charity That Assists Victims Of Domestic Violence. A Few Years Later, They Had Me And My Younger Sister Who Is Nine. My Mother Has Always Favored My Younger Sister Because She Is Very Impressionable And Does Whatever My Mother Says. My Mother Only Eats One Meal A Day, If That. She Is Anorexic And Is Constantly Putting Herself Down About Her Weight, Which Sets An Unhealthy Example For Myself And My Younger Sister. She Makes Herself Seem Like The Victim Who Can Do No Wrong In Every Situation. She Is Always Right In Her Eyes. I Am Seeking Legal Advice Because I Do Not Wish To Live With Her Any Further. I Have Expressed This To My Father, Who Has Discussed It With His Lawyer. My Father Is Very Vague Regarding The Divorce, And When He Spoke To His Attorney, He Said Something Along The Lines Of 'The Judge Will Decide What Is Best.' This Upset Me A Little, And So Did My Father'S Statement Where He Said &Quot;I Think It'S Healthy For A Child To Have Both Parents In Their Life&Quot;. I Confronted Him (My Brother'S Advice) About This, And Asked Him If He Even Wanted Me To Live With Him At All, Because It Really Didn'T Sound Like It. He Told Me That Of Course He Wanted Me To Live With Him, And That He Wished He Could Have Me And My Sister Live With Him All The Time, But It Was Ultimately The Judge'S Decision What Is Best For The Child. My Father Is Being Unhelpful, And My Mother Has Not Found Out Yet About Me Not Wanting To Live With Her. I Really Need Someone'S Help. I Don'T Want To Have To Be Stuck Living With An Unfit, Unstable Parent, And I Especially Don'T Want My Sister To Live With One. Please Help Me.
Even though he is your father, unfortunately most men like things to be done for them. If it was up to a judge then it would all be fine,because in the end it isn't him making the decision.. Some times its just too hard for them. IF you really don't want to live with your mum anymore and your dad is not helping either, then I think it might be best to find legal representation yourself. I know this means money. But you can always look into lawyers that sometimes do cases for free, its called pro bono. Maybe do an internet search for someone in your area. That way they can prepare a legal document for you to divorce your mother ( I think Macaulay Caulkin did it years ago) but he did it to both parents. The info is out there, you just have to find it. I live in australia so I can't help you with that side of it sorry.
Also your dad could just be really sad too, but there could be many reasons why he doesnt want to help you. But good luck any way..