4 Methods To Help Your Lawyer Enable You To When you need a legal professional at all, you need to work closely using them as a way to win your case. Irrespective of how competent they can be, they're going to need your help. Listed below are four important methods to help your legal team help you win: 1. Be Totally Honest And Up Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - irrespective of what information you're going to reveal in their mind. Privilege means what you say is saved in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team should know all things in advance - most importantly information one other side could learn about and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep an ongoing and factual account of all information related to your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys with all the current data they must assist them to win. 3. Turn Up Early For Many Engagements Never be late when you're appearing before a court and prevent wasting the attorney's time, too, by being by the due date, each time. The truth is, because you might need to discuss last minute details or perhaps be extra ready for the truth you're facing, it's a great idea to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate You Have Your Act Together If you've been responsible for any type of crime, it's important to be able to prove to the court that you just both regret the actions and they are making strides toward boosting your life. For example, if you're facing driving under the influence, volunteer for a rehab program. Be sincere and involved with the cities the judge is presiding over. Working more closely together with your legal team increases your odds of absolute success. Try these tips, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you must win your case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
What Is Intellectual Property Law Like?
Is It Interesting? Is Is Repetitive? Does It Pay Well (Not The Main Factor!)?
Thanks For Your Advice :)
Intellectual property law falls into three areas. The first is registration/prosecution for copyrights, trademarks and patents. That kind of work generally is not particularly interesting and can be repetitive and mundane. The second is licensing of intellectual property which can be somewhat more interesting as some arrangements may require nuance and special provisions that need to negotiated and drafted. The third area is litigation, in either defending against infringement or license breaches or bringing an action for the same on behalf of an owner or licensee of the intellectual property which also can be interesting. Of course overall, the role of an IP lawyer is also advising clients of their rights and liabilities when intellectual property, there's or others, comes into play in their business. Just as in any other area of law it can pay well or not depending on the size and profile of the clients you represent, and just as in any area of law it can be difficult finding employment unless you graduate from a top law school with top grades.
Where Can I Find Affordable Lawyers Online?
Do a google search for "American Bar Association in (your city)." Then click on the heading that says "Pro Bono." That should give you a list of all of the lawyers in your city that will work for free. Good luck.
Small Auto Injuries Claim In Fremont Ca Alameda County, How Much Should The Pain And Suffering Be??
I Got Into A Car Accident A Few Months Ago, The Other Person Is At Fault, His Insurance Is Geico And I Already Got The Medical Treatments; My Medical Bills Came Out To Be $2000 (Out Of My Own Pocket). The Car Damage Came Out To Be $1300 Which Geico Paid. But Geico Only Offers $500 Settlement For Medical Treatments, Pain & Suffering, Which I Did Not Settle. I'M Gonna Go File Through Small Claim Court In Alameda County, Any Suggestion On How Much My Pain And Suffering Should Be? Thx Guys!
You should get a personal injury attorney to represent you because you should NEVER be settling for less than the actual cost of your medical treatments resulting from an accident that wasn't your fault. Geico is trying to screw you over because you don't have anyone representing you.
When I was in an accident, I was offered an additional $1500 for my pain/inconvenience on top of my medical bills, which were also around $2000. Don't go through small claims because you won't be able to have an attorney. Tell Geico they either give you the full amount of your medical costs (why were you paying out of pocket anyway? Usually this is set up through the insurance company of the person who hit you) or else you will hire an attorney and take this to court, which would cost them an awful lot more than $2000....
See a PI attorney for a consultation. In these cases you don't pay anything unless you win.
Hey I saw your response so here's mine: Speak to another attorney!! The one you talked to just didn't want your case, so find one who will take it. Maybe he only goes after huge cases. You have to interview attorneys until you find a decent one you feel comfortable with.
As for paying the medical up front, Geico should have been doing that from the beginning, not you OR your insurance company. They should have sent you to doctors they have deals with (and Geico being so huge, there will be lots of them) that will see you and bill Geico for it, not you. Look under the yellow pages for "attorneys - personal injury" and make an appt to see a couple of them. What the heck, the consult's free. As for pain & suffering, it really varies on your injuries, but you don't get much in CA anymore, maybe $1000-$2000 above your medical expenses, but again, ask a PI attorney. Usually you get a lot more money rewarded when you have an attorney. PI attorneys do take 1/3rd of your reward, but if Geico is shafting you, it would pay to get one anyway.
Which Laptop(Under $750.00) Would Be Best For Doing Legal Research?
I Need To Buy One Before Next Semester; I'Ll Be Taking 4 Law Classes And 1 Access Dbma Class.
ANY laptop under your price cap will do nicely for legal research.
What do you think that you need? More importantly, why do you think you need what you think you need?
Let's look at this. You need the ability to get online, and you need the ability to type, and you need the ability to save what you type, and you need the ability to print what you type. Getting online is all about having an internet connection... and that has nothing to do with your laptop. Typing... well, all laptops have keyboards. Saving your documents... is something you can do on any laptop. Printing all depends on whether or not you get a printer, and has nothing to do with what laptop you get.
So. If you were to look around EBay, or Craigslist, or your local newspaper, and you were able to find a laptop from 8 to 9 years ago, and it had Windows 2000 on it... that would work just fine. You would be able to get online with it, and it comes with Windows Write (a basic word processor), and you could purchase any one of a number of printers at Target or Walmart... and there you would be, all ready to do your legal research.
You could also walk into Best Buy and purchase the lowest priced laptop they have in the store at the time, and it will do everything you need. You could go to http://www.bestbuy.com and order the cheapest laptop they have available online (since they have inexpensive ones online that they do not have in the stores). You could buy your laptop at Walmart. You could buy a $200 laptop from http://www.geeks.com and it would do what you needed to do.
Which brings me back to my original questions to you... why do you think you need more than the most basic of laptops? What are you not saying?
Anywhere Online I Can Get Free Legal Advice?
Thanks In Advance :)
There are quite a lot of places you can get advice from - for free - all you need to do is run a search in Google or Yahoo!
Although I've never used the service you can try http://www.worldlawdirect.com/
They seem to have offices in quite a few countries, so hopefully this will help you :)
Can A Juvenile Be Convicted With Only A Confession He Mad As Evidence?
Can A Juvenile Be Convicted Of A Crime If He Said He Did It In A Interview And Then Said He Didnt Do It With The Confession As The Only Evidence
Juvenile law is different from adult law in that no jury hears the case and judges the defendant. Juvenile cases, unless the kid is being tried as an adult, are heard only by the judge, and the judge decides the case and the sentencing. If a kid confesses something, and then retracts the confession it would be up to the judge to decide if the confession was accurate, or perhaps coerced, in which case the confession may not stand.