3 Strategies To Know You've Picked The Best Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to go through the legal court system, particularly if lack confidence with your legal team. Listed below are three important ways to realize that you've hired the right lawyer: 1. They Are Experts In Your Form Of Case Legislation is often tricky and therefore requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you want a legal professional, search for one that deals with the issue you're facing. Even though a relative or friend recommends you make use of a company they know, should they don't possess a focus that's comparable to your case, keep looking. As soon as your attorney is undoubtedly an expert, especially in the trouble you're facing, you already know you've hired the correct one. 2. The Lawyer Features A Winning Record Based on the circumstances, it might be challenging to win a case, especially if the team working for you has minimal to no experience. Seek out practices who have won numerous cases that pertain to yours. While this is no guarantee that you just case will probably be won, it provides you with a much better shot. 3. They Listen And Respond When the attorney you've chosen takes the time to listen to your concerns and reply to your inquiries, you've probably hired the correct one. No matter how busy they are or how small your concerns seem from the perspective, it's crucial that they reply to you within a caring and timely manner. From the aim of look at an ordinary citizen who isn't familiar with the judicial system, court cases could be pretty scary you want updates and also to feel as if you're part of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to you and the case as opposed to others. Be sure you've hired the best team for the circumstances, to ensure that you can put the matter behind you immediately. Faith within your legal representative is step one to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Do You Know A Good Legal Aid Lawyer - Family Lawyer ?
Off Course You Can Name Any Dirty Games - He Did It ... He Called Children'S Aid, Police, Inculted Me, Even Threaten Me, Called In A Children'S Aid To Investigate My Daugheter'S Moods In Daycare
Now He Has A Restriction To Contact That He Wants To Lift And I Dont Want Due To The Whole Abuse I Have Suffered ... Oh My Lord !!!!
Do You Know Any Good Lawyers ?
Contact your local county bar association, or look in the phone book under legal aid.
I Need A Lawyer For My Father Regarding A Fraud Case. What Kind Of Lawyer Does That Type Of Work?
My Elderly Father Was Pressured Into Buying A Craftmatic Bed And Was Promised It Could Be Returned If He Didn'T Like It. Well That Was A Lie And I Went Online And Found This Has Happened To Alot Of Elderly People. Where Should I Start?
Hiring a lawyer for minor legal problems can be expensive, but there are websites like LawGuru, FindLaw and other places where you can get free legal advice. I found this website useful - http://www.uelp.org/freelegal.html
Sexual Harassment Lawsuit?
Ok Here'S My Problem:
I Have This Friend At Work That Has Said Some Stuff To Me In A Sexual Way. I Know It Is Sexual Harassment. Here Is My Questions. 1. Can I Sue Him Without Suing The Company? 2. Will He Go To Jail? 3. Can I Still Keep My Job If I Do Sue Him? 4. How Much Can I Sue Him For?
1. Sure, you can sue him, but he is less likely to have funds to cover a judgment in your favor than the company is. But you can't sue the company unless you have provided documentation to the company that he has harassed you, and they did nothing to help you. 2. He will not go to jail. Sexual harassment is a civil wrong (tort), not a crime. Therefore it is not punishable by jail time or any other penal consequence. Wouldn't be a horrible blasphemy of the First Amendment if we could actually go to jail for saying sexy things? 3. Sure, you might be able to keep your job, but don't expect and comfy working atmosphere after that. More likely people will look at you as a troublemaker and be afraid of talking to you lest they get sued also. Sometimes when a person files a lawsuit that involves their place of work, one of the stipulations os resolving the lawsuit is that the employee must leave the job, but that is usually only when the company is sued. 4. Oh, can I tell you how much lawyers hate this question. It is very near the gathering of evidence and weighing of all variables that one can determine what a lawsuit is worth, not at the beginning where only the sketchiest of details have been revealed. Lawyers don't have a pamphlet or booklet or anything that reads: "sexual harassment $50,000; racial harassment $60,000, punch in the eye $100,000."
Having answered all your questions in order, talking to your friend (well, you did call him that) and telling him his sexual comments are unwelcome might be a more productive response than counting your judgment.
Is There A Way Of Finding The Highest Google Page Ranked Legal Directories?
I Want To Put My Process Serving Website In Some More Legal Directories, However I Want To Put My Money Where It Is Most Useful. In Order To Add Rank To My Own Website I Would Only Like To Place My Link On Pages That Have At Least A 7 Google Page Rank. Is There An Easy Way Of Doing This?
There are lots of ways to add page rank to your website through the placing of backlinks. Everyone puts backlinks on the usual sites, like blogs, forums, social bookmarking...etc And we all should do this anyway. The key is te quality of the backlinks. And as you have mentioned, at least a PR7 rank in google.
Well I have found the perfect answer to what you are looking for.
There is a way, and you said easy way, so what is easier than having someone else so the work for you. Not just sloppy work, or the usual page rank stuff. We are talking about PR6 all the way to PR10.
That is what I do and most SEO marketers do. Check it out below.
Is This A Standard Custody Agreement?
My Wife And Her Ex Husband Are Currently Going Through A Relatively Un-Nasty Dispute, But I Fear That Soon Things Will Take A Turn For The Worse.
The Ex Is Requesting A Modification To The Current Custody Agreement, Which We Agree Is Needed. However In The Proposed Agreement, Which He States Is A &Quot;Standard&Quot; Agreement For The County In Which The Case Is Being Tried, It States That The Child Will Spend Every Other Week, During The Summer, With The Father.
The Child Despises Going To His Father'S On Weekends As It Is, We Can'T Fathom The Idea Of Forcing Him To Go For A Week At A Time, Is This Truly Standard? The Only Place I Can Find A Copy Of This &Quot;Standard&Quot; Agreement Is On A Local Attorney'S Website, Which Leads Me To Believe It Something This Attorney Has Cooked Up For His Clients.
At What Age Does The Childs Opinion Begin To Matter?
What Chance Do We Have Of Avoiding This If We Go Back To Court?
What Do I Do? We Hate Lawyers, They Are A Waste Of Money And Tim
There usually is a standard agreement. I had one funny thing is she lived in KY and I lived in TX and It read like I lived next door. Since my divorce I have been in the legal field and I wish I knew what I know now. Most of the answers I say may vary from state to state. What age does the child's opinion matter usually 12 yrs, but that depends on the Judge and or state. You can can Pro Se on this issue (on your own), File your own motions to avoid paying for a lawyers. As far as avoiding going to court. If you to have agreement then your chances are good, file a stipulated agreement. If no agreement then it might need a hearing. Check with the court house and see about the forms, fees, any pro se classes before you do anything. The more you know now the better thing will be down the road.
What Is The Bottoms-Up Theory By Means Of Constitutional Law And Posner?
Posner takes a perspective of Constitutional law from the judges who make the decisions. In that sense, it is a bottom-up approach with the "up" being the document itself. If you have access to westlaw or lexisnexus, the citation for his article is 56 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 4. The name of the article is "The Constitution as an Economic Document."
Posner, as a member of the Chicago school of economics, is concerned with the theory that judges make policy decisions based on the economic consequences of a ruling.
In general, a bottom up approach concerns legal criticism with particular aspects in action rather than broad concepts. A bottom up approach to contract law involves the study of offer and acceptance rather than the statutory framework of the uniform commercial code such as the distinction between and classification of merchant and non-merchant. Most study of law is a bottom up approach whereby the overarching concepts are revealed through the rulings of individual cases. A constitutional law course does not involve a reading of the document itself followed by a bunch of law review articles, but reading the cases which interpreted it and the problems of society the cases were addressing. A student takes the bottom, the cases, and reaches an understanding of the top, the Constitution.
The bottoms-up theory could be classified as a use of the philosophy of legal realism in legal criticism.
You should note that Posner is concerned with economically efficient outcomes and not morality. A breach of contract may be morally reprehensible, but it is Posner's belief that merely economic damages should govern the law of contracts and the law should not punish for the breach i.e. if a party breaches a $10k contract in order to sell the same goods to another for $25k, the party SHOULD breach the contract and pay the non-breaching party $10k under Posner's view. Posner believes that judges can stimulate economic growth through upholding constitutional protections in commerce, but he also believes that the Constitution is a limitation on judges from choosing what might be the most economically efficient decision.