Finding An Experienced Lawyer Irrespective of what your legal needs are you will find that there are loads of lawyers in your neighborhood that advertise they are experts in your form of case. This could make the entire process of finding one with a lot of experience somewhat of a challenge. However, if you follow the following it will be easy to narrow down your quest to the right one in almost no time. The first step is to create a list of the lawyers which can be listed in your neighborhood specializing in your needs. When you are causeing this to be list you must only include those you have an excellent vibe about depending on their advertisement. Then you can narrow this list down by using a bit of time evaluating their website. There you should be able to find the number of years they have been practicing and several general information about their success rates. At this time your list ought to have shrunken further to the people which you felt had professional websites along with an appropriate level of experience. You must then take the time to check out independent reviews of every attorney. Make sure you see the reviews instead of just relying upon their overall rating. The details within the reviews provides you with a solid idea of the direction they communicate with their customers and the time they invest into each case that they are focusing on. Finally, it is advisable to talk to no less than the final three lawyers which have the credentials you are looking for. This will give you some time to truly evaluate how interested they can be in representing you and the case. It really is imperative that you follow all of these steps to ensure that you find someone that has the correct level of experience to obtain the very best outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
The Role Of Law And Lawyers In Controlling Social Behaviour?
How The Role Of Law Controls Sogial Behaviour
How Lawyers Control Social Behaviours
the only reason for laws is to control people, the only reason for lawyers is to argue the laws that are presented.
Why Is Burglary A Felony?!?
I Had No Idea It Was Before...I Think A Felony Should Only Happen When You Seriously Hurt Someone Else.
Felony burglary involves two factors: unauthorized entry to an occupied building or dwelling (whether the occupants are there or not) and intent to commit a criminal act. Misdemeanor burglary (also called breaking and entering) is unauthorized entry to an occupied building or dwelling without criminal intent. So it's not always a felony. Intent determines either/or. Some argue that burglary is an incomplete or inchoate offense and punishments should be lessened or at least graded (similar to theft) but thus far, this has not happened. And there are many felonies that are non-violent (forgery, fraud, theft, possession of certain drugs as examples). It doesn't lessen the punishment for them.
Is This A Case Of Medical Malpractice?
My Brother Was Diagnosed 2 Years Ago With Hypertension And Diabetes, After He Had A Stroke. He Took His Meds For A While And Then Stopped Because Something Was Making His Leg Hurt Really Bad. I Went And Picked Him Up (500 Miles Away) And Brought Him To My Home. He Has No Insurance So I Took Him To The Free Clinic And They Put Him Back On The Same Meds That He Was On Before. Well, One Of Them Was Making His Blood Sugar Drop Really Low..I.E.15 One Time. Anyway, He Was Taken By Ems To The Hospital And They Kept Him For A Few Days And Continued Him On All Of His Meds Except The Diabetes Med. They Gave Him Something Else In The Hospital. We Were Told When He Was Released To Take His Meds Like He Had Been Doing. Well, 3 Days Later He Was Back In The Hospital. This Time They Had Him In Icu For 3 Days Then Released Him With The Same Instructions. I Should Point Out That The First Two Times, He Passed Out And We Didn'T Know What Was Going On. The 3Rd Time We Had To Call Ems Was Because He Was Shaking So Badly, And We Couldn'T Get His Sugar Level Reading. (The 1St Two Times We Didn'T Have A Glucometer Yet). When Ems Arrived They Took His Sugar And It Was 15. He Was In The Er For About An Hour And A Half...Long Enough To Get A Good Deal Of Glucose And Then They Sent Him Home. Needless To Say He Was Back In An Hour....Same Thing...Couldn'T Stop The Severe Shaking. I Happened To Be Out Of Town At The Time And My Daughter Stayed In Myj Home With Him. I Called The Hospital To Try And Find Out Why They Had Even Let Him Go Int He First Place And All They Would Tell Me Is That Someone In His Condition Should Be Seeing A Dr Regulary. Well, He Was. This All Took Place In A Two Week Span. Anyway, When I Asked For The Er Dr'S Name She Refused To Give It To Me. I Tried To Get Him Transported To A Hopsital 30 Miles Away And The Other Hospital Said That The Er Dr Would Have To Call The Dr At The New Hopsital. The Dr Refused To Do This. Said They Would Stabilize Him And They Could Drive Him. After The 2Nd Time In The Er That Night They Admitted Him For A Day. Fianlly, A Staff Dr Changed His Meds For The Diabetes. He Said It Was Lowereing His Sugar To Badly. He'S Doing Better Now, But I Am Still Fuming Mad At The Way The Hopsital Handles Things. Does He Have Any Recourse Whatsoever In This Matter? We Aren'T The First To Have Major Problems With This Hospital And Probably Won'T Be The Last.
You need three things for a successful medical malpractice action:
1. An injury.
2. Negligence by the health care provider.
3. That negligence is the proximate cause of the injury.
It is often extremely difficult to established a diabetic patient on a medication to control his blood sugar, and an emergency room is not the place to do that. Your brother should have been consulting his regular doctor each time he had an incident that resulted in a trip to the ER. Each time your brother was admitted to the ER, he was stabilized before discharge or admitted to the hospital.
Overall, since it does not appear that your brother suffered any injury, and the emergency physicians were not negligent in their treatment of him (and the standard for an emergency physician is different from a family physician), I doubt you have a successful malpractice claim.
Your best best would be to make a complaint with the hospital, the health department, or the medical licensing board, although I'm not sure any of those entities would find fault with the care your brother received either.
Does Anyone Know The Best Dui Lawyer In San Diego? Is It Mr. Dui?
Search resultsSan Diego DUI Lawyer - DUI Attorney San Diego - CA Drunk Driving Lawyer
DUI San Diego : Comprehensive Online Resource for California Drunk Driving Law, DUI Lawyers, DWI Attorneys & Drunk Driving Information
duisandiego.com - Cached
San Diego DUI Lawyer, Drunk Driving Defense Attorney Sd County
San Diego DUI Lawyer James Bickford specializes in drunk driving defense cases. Call this California DUI Attorney specializing in San Diego County at 619-702-7400.
www.dui.com/california/san-diego - 129k
San Diego DUI Lawyer Blog :: Published by San Diego, California DUI ...
San Diego DUI Lawyer Blog :: Published by San Diego, California DUI & Drunk Driving Defense Lawyer | Crime Attorney | San Diego Law Center
www.sandiegoduilawyerblog.com - 119k - Cached
Must Lawyers Be Fingerprinted To Practice Law?
Are Lawyers Required To Be Fingerprinted Before Practicing Law In All 50 States? Research Paper For School. I Google It But Fingerprints And Lawyers Only Brings Up Case Law. Hoping To Hear From Someone Who Knows First Hand And Could Point Me To A Source. Thanks
Yes, before the attorney has taken the bar exam, they must submit to a fingerprint and background check before they can take their first case. After the background check is completed and the attorney is cleared, they will get their license to practice law.
What'S The Difference Between A Statutory Law And A Constitutional Law?
I Was On Wikipedia And They Show A Map Of The United States. They Use Different Colors To Represent The States Laws About Same-Sex Marriage, I'M Not Going To List Them All But Mississippi, Tennessee, & Missouri Are Red And That Means &Quot;Constitution Bans Same-Sex Marriage&Quot;. But Pennsylvania, West Virginia, & Virginia Are Light Red And That Means &Quot;Statute Bans Same-Sex Marriage&Quot;..
I Just Dont Understand The Difference Between The Constitution Ban & Statue Ban..
And Furthermore Are They Talking About Their Own Personal Constitution Or The Countries Constitution, Any Help Would Be Great... And I'M Not Here Debating Same Sex Marriage I Just Wanna Know What The Difference Between A Statutory Law And A Constitutional Law Is, Lol.
Constitutional law has higher authority than statutory law. Statutes can be and most often are adopted by the state legislature and if a statute is deemed by the courts of the state to be a violation of the state constitution, then the statute is unconstitutional. But the state constitutions are adopted by the voters of the state themselves. The process of amending state constitutions is often much harder than the process of passing a bill out of the state legislature.
A reason why a state might adopt a provision into the state constitution to ban gay marriage is to prevent the courts from legalizing gay marriage via an "interpretation" of the state constitution. Once the state constitution explicitly says gay marriage is banned, then the courts will obviously not render that interpretation.