3 Methods To Know You've Picked The Proper Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to go through a legal court system, especially if you lack confidence in your legal team. Here are three important methods to understand that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Are Experts In Your Sort Of Case What the law states is usually tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you really need a lawyer, search for one who relates to the challenge you're facing. Regardless of whether a relative or friend recommends you use a strong they are aware, if they don't possess a focus that's much like your case, keep looking. As soon as your attorney is surely an expert, especially in the difficulty you're facing, you know you've hired the right choice. 2. The Lawyer Includes A Winning Record Based on the circumstances, it might be difficult to win a case, particularly if the team helping you has virtually no experience. Seek out practices which have won numerous cases that apply to yours. While this is no guarantee that you case will probably be won, it provides you with a much better shot. 3. They Listen And Respond If the attorney you've chosen takes the time to listen for your concerns and react to your inquiries, you've probably hired the correct one. Regardless how busy they can be or how small your concerns seem using their perspective, it's important that they reply to you within a caring and timely manner. From the aim of look at a typical citizen who isn't knowledgeable about the judicial system, court cases may be pretty scary you need updates and also to think that you're part of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to your case than the others. Be sure you've hired the most suitable team to your circumstances, to ensure that you can put the matter behind you as soon as possible. Faith inside your legal representative is the first task to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Lawyers Out There, Can I Sue?
In 2007 My Pregnant Sister Was Killed In A Car Accident . We Were Devastated Also Because She Was Exhausted From Her Work Sending Her On Trips Which Kept Her Out Late The Night Before Then Got Her Up Early That Morning. She Had Been Complaining To My Parents About How Tired She Was And I Complained To My Husband That They Were Running Her Ragged .
After The Accident I Couldn'T Place Blame. She Ran The Flashing Light, The Truck Driver Walked Away Without A Scratch. All We Could Do Was Grieve. Now, Today, 6 Years Later I Am Angry With Them. I Remember She Said How She Only Was Going To Get 3 Weeks Leave Instead Of 3 Months When The Baby Was Born . She Gave Them Everything, She Was So Smart And Driven, Educated And Talented, And They Took And Took . Now I Want Them To At Least Be Made To Treat Their Employees Better. I Couldn'T Hate Them Then, But Now I Want Them To Be Responsible For Their Part In Her Death . Lawyers Out There, Can I Sue Or Is It Too Late?
It is highly unlikely that you have the basis for a successful lawsuit.
First, the statute of limitations for most personal injury-type actions is two or three years. That means the lawsuit would have needed to have been filed no later than 2010.
Second, you would not have standing to sue, unless you were the personal representative of your sister's estate (usually that would be a spouse or parent).
Third, did your sister's employer hold a gun to her head, force her to go on all trips, and stay out late? Did your sister ever voice her concerns about the number of trips/the hours required by the trips? If your sister did not feel rested or alert enough to drive, it was her responsibility (not her employer's) not to get behind the wheel.
Also, if your sister's employer fell under the terms of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), she was entitled to twelve weeks of UNPAID leave for the birth of a child. Your sister's employer may have only been willing to pay her for three weeks of maternity leave. It would have been her choice whether to remain off of work for the remaining nine weeks, without pay.
If you truly want to pursue a lawsuit, you should consult with a reputable personal injury attorney in your area. Alternatively, you may want to consult with a therapist to help with your grief.
Is Corporate Law The Same As Business/Commercial Law?
For the most part, yes. Often times the terms mean the same thing. However, some people may look at it a little different:
Some (like myself) may view corporate law as a type of business law.
Business law pertains to all the codes/laws that apply to transactions, taxes, hiring, commercial codes, etc.
In my mind, the term corporate law may pertain to just that part of the business law that deals with corporations and not smaller businesses. Corporate law tends to focus on large firms (corporations). Many times corporate law is important because these lawyers often provide legal advice to large, multinational firms. They may have to deal learn about laws in different countries. Also, if the corporation is publicly traded (ie, you can buy stock in it), then there are many more laws that the lawyer has to be aware of (sarbanes-oxley, etc).
Most non-lawyers would use the terms interchangeably.
What Is The Purpose Of Family Court?
What Do The Lawyers Attended To Gain At Family Court
Idealistically - They're there to protect the rights and interests of all parties involved.
Realistically - Some (emphasis on some) are there to prolong and complicate matters in order to ensure a larger fee for their services.
Family court is highly favorable than any other option that would allow for one person to decide the fates of others by only hearing each party speak. One party with interests may be vastly more knowledgeable than the other in terms of law or just have a larger voice/personality which puts the other(s) at a great disadvantage.
When "experts" on the law are introduced in order to represent all parties with interests then it's considered a much less biased and equal form of representation and ultimately it's up to the judge to interpret the law in the context of what was represented by each party involved.
You'd be surprised how un-"black and white" the law can be.
How Was Nelson Mandela'S Involvement In The Banning Of The Apartheid?
As a young student, Mandela became involved in political opposition to the white minority government's denial of political, social and economic rights to South Africa's black majority. Joining the African National Congress in 1942, he founded its more dynamic Youth League two years later together with Walter Sisulu, Oliver Tambo and others.
After the 1948 election victory of the Afrikaner-dominated National Party with its apartheid policy of racial segregation, Mandela was prominent in the ANC's 1952 Defiance Campaign and the 1955 Congress of the People, whose adoption of the Freedom Charter provided the fundamental program of the anti-apartheid cause. During this time Mandela and fellow lawyer Oliver Tambo operated the law firm of Mandela and Tambo, providing free or low-cost legal counsel to many blacks who would have been otherwise entirely without legal representation.
Initially committed to non-violent mass struggle he and 150 others were arrested on 5 December 1956 and charged with treason. The marathon Treason Trial of 1956-1961 followed, and all were acquitted. Mandela and his colleagues accepted the case for armed action after the shooting of unarmed protesters at Sharpeville in March 1960 and the subsequent banning of the ANC and other anti-apartheid groups.
In 1961 he became the commander of the ANC's armed wing Umkhonto we Sizwe ("Spear of the Nation", or MK), which he co-founded. He coordinated a sabotage campaign against military, government and civilian targets and made plans for possible guerrilla war if sabotage failed to end apartheid. He also fundraised for MK abroad, and arranged for paramilitary training, visiting various African governments.
On August 5, 1962 he was arrested after the CIA tipped off the police, after living on the run for seventeen months and was imprisoned in the Johannesburg Fort. Three days later the charges of leading workers to strike in 1961 and leaving the county illegally were read to him during a court appearance. On October 25, 1962, Mandela was sentenced to five years in prison. Two years later on June 11, 1964 a verdict had been reached concerning his previous engagement in the African National Congress.
While Mandela was in prison, police arrested prominent ANC leaders on 11 July 1963 at Liliesleaf Farm, Rivonia. Mandela was brought in, and at the Rivonia Trial, Mandela, Ahmed Kathrada, Walter Sisulu, Govan Mbeki, Andrew Mlangeni, Raymond Mhlaba, Elias Motsoaled, Walter Mkwayi (escaped during trial), Arthur Goldreich (escaped from prison before trial), Dennis Goldberg and Lionel "Rusty" Bernstein were charged with sabotage and crimes equivalent to treason (but which were easier for the government to prove). Joel Joffe, Arthur Chaskalson and George Bizos were part of the defence team that represented the accused. All except Rusty Bernstein were found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment on 12 June, 1964. Charges included involvement in planning armed action, in particular sabotage (which Mandela admits to) and a conspiracy to help other countries invade South Africa (which Mandela denies). Over the course of the next twenty-six years, Mandela became increasingly associated with opposition to apartheid to the point where the slogan "Free Nelson Mandela" became the rallying cry for all anti-apartheid campaigners around the world.
While in prison, Mandela was able to send a statement to the ANC who in turn published it on 10 June, 1980 which said in part:
'Unite! Mobilise! Fight on! Between the anvil of united mass action and the hammer of the armed struggle we shall crush apartheid!'[http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/ma...
Refusing an offer of conditional release in return for renouncing armed struggle (February 1985), Mandela remained in prison until February 1990, when sustained ANC campaigning and international pressure led to his release on 11 February, on the orders of state president F.W. de Klerk and the ending of the ban on the ANC. He and de Klerk shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993. Mandela had already been awarded the Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought in 1988.
As president of the ANC (July 1991 - December 1997) he ran a largely ceremonial and uncompetitive campaign against de Klerk for the new office of President of South Africa. Mandela won, becoming the nation's first black Head of State. De Klerk was appointed deputy president.
As president, (May 1994 - June 1999), Mandela presided over the transition from minority rule and apartheid, winning international respect for his advocacy of national and international reconciliation. Some radicals were disappointed with the social achievements of his term of office, however, particularly the government's ineffectiveness in stemming the AIDS crisis.
Tax And Social Security Laws?
I Recently Found Out Someone I Am Dating Is Using Fake Social Security Numbers For Employment And Health Insurance. I Also Found Out That He Has Not Filed Taxes In A While Probably Due To The Fact That The Ss Numbers He Is Using Is Fake. I Have Not Confronted Him With This But This Is Illegal And A Very Dangerous Situation Because I Have A Child. I Don't Want To Aide Or Abet Anything. I Need To Know What To Do And What Are The Punishable Laws Are For This Type Of Crime. Help!!!!!!
Your boyfriend is committing tax fraud, and also identity theft, a felony. If he is not legally in this country, both crimes will make him deported. As long as you do not file joint taxes with him, you cannot be held responsible for his crimes. However, he is hurting his own financial future as he will not get credit for the social security taxes. And, if he is caught falsifying health insurance and your child is benefitting from that fraud, the authorities could come after you for medical costs.
Basically, it is a mess. You have three choices - (1) put up with it, but keep your own act clean. I wouldn't move in with him, or combine any money with him, as he can get hauled off to jail for this stuff or (2) decide he is not someone you ethically want to have as an influence over you and your child and dump him. Or, (3) encourage him to do the right thing and use his accurate info for his job and insurance. I am willing to bet that the reason he is not using his own ss# is either he owes back taxes or back child support. Either way, it doesn't seem like he is going to support you and your child financially over the long run. There are nice men out there who do not play these financial games. Find one of them, and you will be much happier.
Asbestos Removal Worker Had An Accident At His Job Does He Have The Right To Sue The Owner Of The Building?
This Happened One Year Ago, Since Then He Has Been Receiving Workers Compensation Check. The Lawyer He Has Says That He Can Only Sue The Asbestos Company But The Owner Of The Building Were He Was Working. He Wants To Sue The Building'S Owner Too Because When The Fire Started He Was Trying To Find A Way Out But All The Emergency Doors Were With A Lock And The Supervisor Didn'T Have The Key. We Have Talked To Other Lawyers And They Said The Same Thing, But Do You Have An Idea Want Can We Do Or He Can Only Sue The Company As The Lawyer Said. Thank You.
The asbestos removal company takes full responsibility in this case. the school hired the removal company. the removal company either designed the project or used a consultants design. they also have a full state/osha guideline for proper procedures for asbestos removal and general safety. they have full ownership of the project and the safety on the job site. The asbestos removal company is responsibile for their workers safety.