3 Methods To Know You've Picked The Proper Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to go through a legal court system, especially if you lack confidence in your legal team. Here are three important methods to understand that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Are Experts In Your Sort Of Case What the law states is usually tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you really need a lawyer, search for one who relates to the challenge you're facing. Regardless of whether a relative or friend recommends you use a strong they are aware, if they don't possess a focus that's much like your case, keep looking. As soon as your attorney is surely an expert, especially in the difficulty you're facing, you know you've hired the right choice. 2. The Lawyer Includes A Winning Record Based on the circumstances, it might be difficult to win a case, particularly if the team helping you has virtually no experience. Seek out practices which have won numerous cases that apply to yours. While this is no guarantee that you case will probably be won, it provides you with a much better shot. 3. They Listen And Respond If the attorney you've chosen takes the time to listen for your concerns and react to your inquiries, you've probably hired the correct one. Regardless how busy they can be or how small your concerns seem using their perspective, it's important that they reply to you within a caring and timely manner. From the aim of look at a typical citizen who isn't knowledgeable about the judicial system, court cases may be pretty scary you need updates and also to think that you're part of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to your case than the others. Be sure you've hired the most suitable team to your circumstances, to ensure that you can put the matter behind you as soon as possible. Faith inside your legal representative is the first task to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
How Get A Book About Mexico Real Estate Laws ?
I Need A Mexico Real Estate Laws Book In English, But I Don't Have Any Author Of Title. Any Suggestion?
Tittle: How to buy real estate in Mexico by Dennis John Peyton
(Good to give you a general idea). AMAZON
One thing :
Each State in Mexico has it own Real Estate Law and there may be changes from year to year. (Getting a translation of each of this codes, or rules will be really difficult but books like the one above or the info below will give you an introduction)
This Law is part of Mexican Civil Law, and under the categories of INMUEBLES (real estate), and Muebles (literally property that can be move like cars); and is based on the Mexican Constitution. But so many other areas come into play when buying property in Mexico and there are so many Bureaucratic procedures that only a well seasoned and knowledgeable Lawyer should be in charge.
Although you can get familiarize with this laws and specially the limitations and requirements for foreigners to own land or property; you should never attempt to do any deal without consulting a Lawyer of Good Reputation.
Also for any Real Estate Transaction get familiarize with Mexican:
Federal Zone Regulations
The General Law of National Properties
The Constitution and International Treaties (related to real estate)
The Foreign Investment law and its regulations.
Also transaction are always register in a Public Notary which are offices of Notaries Comissioned by the State, there is a limited number, so is not like here in USA.
This information is from a site that also tries to sell Real Estate so I can not attest for the accuracy, and I am not in any way recommending what he (or they) sell; (I am only including the link to give them credit for the info) (AND REMEMBER IT VARIES FOR EACH STATE) but it does give you an idea:
I.- Laws governing ownership and real estate.
Mexico is politically and legally organized as a federal system. This means that two orders of laws exist: federal laws, which apply throughout the Republic, and the local laws dictated by each of the 32 federative entities or States, which apply only in each State.
The subject of ownership and real estate is a matter which corresponds to the States, and which is governed principally under the 32 Civil Codes (1). However, there are some federal laws governing certain aspects of ownership and real estate, which apply as a single law throughout the Republic and including those concerning trade and industry and the rules on banks.
II.- The principles of ownership contained in the Constitution.
1) Ownership corresponded originally to the Nation (the State), which has transferred this to individuals.
2) The Nation can regulate real estate as dictated by public interest.
3) The Nation is directly responsible for the natural resources of the subsoil (mines, petroleum, gas, nuclear energy), waters (sea, lakes, rivers), which cannot be transferred to individuals. These resources can be exploited under concession (2).
4) Concessions are granted both to Mexicans, and to the foreigners who enter into a pact with the Mexican Government to consider themselves as Mexican for this purpose and not to invoke the protection of their Governments, which is known as (Clausula Calvo, or Barren Clause).(3)
5) Foreigners cannot acquire the direct ownership of real estate within an area of 100 kilometers along the borders with neighboring countries, or 50 kilometers along the coast (restricted areas).
6) Agrarian property (rural or country properties) consists of various categories; lots of common land (4) or communal property granted to common land holders or communities, which cannot be negotiated or belong to individuals. The existence of privately-owned agricultural smallholdings is also recognized.
III.- The different kinds of real estate.
In addition to the principles on ownership laid down in the Constitution, the National Assets Law and Civil Codes mention the existence of two kinds of property: that of public dominion and that held by individuals.
1) Property of public dominion is that corresponding to the Federation, States and Municipalities, and to special laws (5).
2) Property of public dominion can also be: property in common use which can be utilized by anyone (such as, for instance, air space, territorial waters, beaches, ports, roads, bridges or monuments) (6), that used for a public service and individual property.
3) Property of public dominion cannot belong to individuals (nor can it be transferred or prescribed, meaning that it cannot be transmitted or acquired by prescription). In order for someone outside the Federation to acquire property of public dominion (such as property destined for public service or unencumbered property), such property must be released from public dominion by means of a disincorporation ruling issued by the President of the Republic.
4) Privately-owned property consists of everything not of public dominion (of the Federation, States or Municipalities), or agrarian common land or communal prope
Question About Oregon Real Estate/Escrow Law?
I Live In Oregon And I Bought A House This Past July From A Couple, I'Ll Refer To Them As Adam And Eve. Everything Went Through Realtors And The Sale Of The House Seemed To Be Good/Legal. The Sale Went Through Escrow And The Escrow Company Said Everything Was Clear. I'Ll Mention Now That I Own The House Outright And So No Mortgage Company Is Involved, But It'S Been About 3 Months And I Still Don'T Have The Deed To The House Yet. I Just Got The Tax Statement And Someone Else'S Name (I'Ll Call Them Judas) Is Also On The Tax Statement. After Some Digging, I Found Out That Right When Or At Some Point After Adam And Eve Originally Bought The House, This Judas Person Also Bought Into It And So All 3 Of Their Names Were On The Deed. Adam And Eve Then Sold Their Portion Of The House To Me, But This Judas Person Still Has Their Name On The Deed. My Questions Are, Is This The Error Of The Escrow Company? Aren'T They Supposed To Make Sure Real Estate Transactions Are Legal? Whose Job Is It Now To Contact This Judas Person And Ask Them To Sign Off Of The Deed? What If This Judas Person Doesn'T Want To Give Up His/Her Rights To The House/Property And Wants To Keep His/Her Name On The Deed?
None of this was legal as Judas would have been on the sale escrow papers. Escrow messed up and you have legal options. Fist contact the conveyance department and report this illegal sale, then your hire an attorney if Adam and Eve and escrow doesn't give you a complete title and deed and you also sue for attorney fee's this is clear cut illegal sale. I'd also make a police report and contact The Better Business Bureau as well as contacting your Congressman and senator, once they get involved people tend do right cause Congress will scare them if they have to respond to Congress or your senator. Do all of it but start with a police report and show the documents you do have. Not your job to track Judas down and don't involve yourself in it cause Escrow has done you so wrong and someone job will be gone soon for committing illegal real estate transaction.
We own homes in Hawaii, Japan, and 2 homes in Phoenix. We've been landlords for a very long time and have bought and sold real estate the sale is null and void. Best wishes pls. PM me as to how it is going as I'm very curious. Best wishes sir, you have the law on your side.
I Need To Talk To A Lawyer For Free Or Cheap About Pursuing A Domestic Violence Case. Where Should I Go?
My Ex Abused Me While I Was 8 Months Pregnant And I Want To Make Sure He Is Punished Accordingly. I'M Not Vengeful, I Just Want To Make Sure He Doesn'T Feel Like He Was Justified In Harming A Pregnant Woman (I Had Bruises And Was Sent To The Hospital For Contractions And High Blood Pressure).
Because a domestic violence assault is a criminal offense, you need to talk to the police. Crimes are handled by the district attorney, not private attorneys. What you need to do is contact the police and make a complaint. The police will take your information and begin an investigation. Don't expect the police to go arrest him right away, but the police HAVE to investigate, and may or may not make an arrest. If there is enough evidence, your case will be passed onto the DA for prosecution.
Legal Help, Without A Lawyer, At Least For Now?
I Have 10 Siblings, And Only One Was Willing To Help, Take Care Of Our Mom, And Grandma. We Bought Our Mom'S House, And Fixed It Up. We Still Owed Our Mom, Over 20,000, And It Was To Be Split Between 8 Of The Siblings. As It Is Well Known, Housing Market Crashed. 5Yrs Ago When My Sister And I Refied The House To Get Our Money Out We Put In, And Pay Some Other Expenses, For Our Mom, I Did Not Keep All My Reciepts. Because My Sister And I Said From This Point On We Start Even. We Were Looking At A 5,000 Profit, If We Sold With In The Next Year. But Our Mom Wanted To Die In Her Home. After Our Mom Died, We Found Out Our House Lost 30,000. That Meant That We Lost Our 5,000 Profit Each, Plus Another 20,000. Our Mom'S House We Bought Was Worth 95,000 And We Owed 98,000. I Had 2 Banks, When That Was, And Do Not Have Them Now. I Am Not Even Sure How To Get The Records, Like The Money Orders, Or Cashiers Check. I Wrote To Everyone. I Have Been Co-Operated With My Sister'S Lawyer. I Sent My Mom'S Will, The Contract My Sister And I Signed, My New Loan Papers, And The Appraisal Of The House. I Have Asked Twice For A Legal View Point Why This Lawyer Thinks I Owe My Sister 10,000. We Are Out 20,000 I Am Out 13,500, And She Is Out 6,500. We Bought This House To Take Care Of Our Mom, But Since The Rest Of My Family Would Not Go In With Us, My Sister And I Were The Only Ones To Split If There Was A Profit. We Were Partners. So I Feel We Should Split The Loss. Any Advice?
It's unlikely that you will get a favorable outcome without consulting a lawyer. I'm one and I'm finding it difficult to even ascertain what your situation is because your description is very incoherent making it unclear how any of the dollar amounts you are talking about are relevant to your sister's claim against you for $10,000.
You need a lawyer to sit down with you and ask you questions to lead the discussion about your legal problems. Based on your writing here I don't think you are going to be able to convey your problem in a manner in which anyone will be able to give you any kind of advice in a simple format like Yahoo! Answers.
Divorce And Custody... Please Help?!?!?
My Husband And I Seperated In March, And On July 13Th He Moved To Ohio And Took Our Son With Him Without Telling Me. July 15Th And I Went And Filed For Divorce And Custody. He Didn'T Tell Anyone On My Side Of The Family That He Was Moving And He Even Moved On A Night That Was Supposed To Be My Night With My Son. With What He Did, Will That Help My Chances Of Getting Custody Of My Son?
Please, Give Me Any Advice Or Information You Could Possibly Know! Please!
ok first I have been through a similar situation with my future step daughter and despite what people tell you YES if a custodial parent takes a child without the other parents permission and leaves the state (unless they have sole legal and physical custody) it is Parental Kidnapping (also called custodial interference. I am so sick of people not knowing this. YOU are doing the right thing in filing for divorce and custody and until a custody agreement is settled in court you have all the same custodial rights as him so it is kidnapping.
Her are steps to follow originally from the american bar association and the center for missing and exploited children when your child has been parentally kidnapped
I unfortunately cannot find the original american bar association parental abduction plan of action because it list s the laws and the 3 different types of arrest warrants you can get.
Google child custody interference laws for your state.
Unfortunately as I have found out from personal experience many law enforcement officials are as uneducated on parental abductions thinking they can't do anything without court papers as some of the people answering here. You have to have the paperwork in front of you call 1 800 the lost and they can direct you.
Even if someone unknowledgable above said "he shows good reason" it is against the law for him to take your son without proper notification and your permission. And taking a child in violation of the law is never considered in the best interest of the child
What'S Best Way To Answer Law Exam Questions?
Criminal Law Case Study Exam..
Use the IRAC method. Not only will your law school professors prefer it, but the bar examiners prefer for you to answer in this fashion. It stands for Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion. That's the order that you need to answer everything in. There are a lot of materials out there on how to properly use IRAC, including those in the bar review courses like BarBri and PMBR and also Emmanuel's Study Guides. Here's a pretty good review of how to break down IRAC:
Issue Section of an IRAC
The IRAC starts with a statement of the issue or question at hand. In the issue section of an IRAC it is important to state exactly what the question in law is. It is also equally important to stay away from including rules or analysis as it confuses the proper use of the methodology.
Rules Section of an IRAC
The rules section of an IRAC follows the statement of the issue at hand. The rule section of an IRAC is the statement of the rules pertinent in deciding the issue stated. Rules in a common law jurisdiction derive from court case precedent and statute. The information included in the rules section depends heavily on the specificity of the question at hand. If the question states a specific jurisdiction then it is proper to include rules specific to that jurisdiction. Another distinction often made in the rule section is a clear delineation of rules that are in holding and rules that are dicta. This helps make a correct legal analysis of the issue at hand. The rules section needs to be a legal summary of all the rules used in the analysis and is often written in a manner which paraphrases or otherwise analytically condenses information into applicable rules.
Analysis Section of an IRAC
The analysis section of an IRAC applies the rules developed in the rules section to the specific facts of the issue at hand. This section uses only the rules stated in the rules section of the IRAC and usually utilizes all the rules stated including exceptions as is required by the analysis. It is important in this section to apply the rules to the facts of the case and explain or argue why a particular rule applies or does not apply in the case presented. The analysis section is the most important section of an IRAC because it develops the answer to the issue at hand.
Conclusion Section of an IRAC
The conclusion section of an IRAC directly answers the question presented in the issue section of the IRAC. It is important for the methodology of the IRAC that the conclusion section of the IRAC not introduce any new rules or analysis. This section restates the issue and provides the final answer.