3 Methods To Know You've Picked The Right Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to undergo a legal court system, particularly if lack confidence in your legal team. Here are three important methods to understand that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Specialize In Your Form Of Case What the law states is usually tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you really need a legal professional, try to find one that deals with the matter you're facing. Even when a relative or friend recommends you make use of a good they know, if they don't use a focus that's comparable to your case, keep looking. Whenever your attorney is undoubtedly an expert, especially in the problem you're facing, you know you've hired the best one. 2. The Lawyer Has A Winning Record Depending on the circumstances, it could be challenging to win a case, specifically if the team helping you has hardly any experience. Search for practices who have won numerous cases that affect yours. Even though this is no guarantee which you case is going to be won, it offers you a better shot. 3. They Listen And Respond In the event the attorney you've chosen takes time to listen to your concerns and answer your inquiries, you've probably hired the right one. Irrespective of how busy they may be or how small your concerns seem from the perspective, it's essential that they answer you inside a caring and timely manner. From the point of view of a typical citizen who isn't familiar with the judicial system, court cases could be pretty scary you require updates as well as to seem like you're section of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to both you and your case as opposed to others. Be sure you've hired the best team to your circumstances, to actually can placed the matter behind you as soon as possible. Faith inside your legal representative is the initial step to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
How Is California'S Community Property Law Different From Wisconsin'S Marital Property Law?
Community property has as its basis that everything that is gained during the marriage belongs equally to both partners. (There are exceptions but that is the basic idea.) So when there is a divorce, each gets half of the property and they each go their own way. (Kids get child support, but that is not part of the divorce law, that is child support.) With each getting half, it is over. They need no reason to see each other again as neither owes anything to the other.
Wisconsin is not a community property state. When a divorce comes it is generally assumed one partner makes more money than the other, one gave up more than the other to make the marriage work. In general the woman is given some of the property and the man has to pay alimony. Because there is still a tie between the two, they frequently are back in court time and time again as the man fails to pay the alimony, or the woman gets married again, etc.
Many couples try to get around all this by having a prenuptial agreement. They agree ahead of time that if divorce comes they will divide up the property in a certain manner. For example, if the woman has $40 million then she may have in the agreement that the husband gets none of that money. Such an agreement would be valid in any state, regardless of the marriage law. That is because contract law is valid in all 50 states.
What Was Australia Like In 1880'S?Does That Have Anything To Do With Henry Lawson'S Poem&Quot;Faces In The Street&Quot;?
Im Doing This For An Assessment Due Tomorrow For English Can? You Give Me Any Insight You Have Please. Thank You
Here you go. Hurry up and read it.
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL STATE
The Roots of Australian Nationalism
National Republicans revere Henry Lawson as a founding father of our faith. Here we look at Lawson from yet another angle: his conception of the "old" imperial Australian State and his vision of a National State for Australia. Modern issues abound.
When Henry Lawson died in 1922, his Sydney funeral became a State funeral with the participation of thousands. This epitome of the national consciousness, a man lauded as the poet laureate of Australia, had died in miserable hardship, the victim of alcohol and despair.
The Australia which feted Lawson goodbye had altered from the land of patriotic writers and republican and labour activists of the 1880s and 1890s, of those who sought the 'national promise' in a Working Man's Paradise, in an Independent National State. Australia had become a fretful country with a people in fear of unseen Bolshevik demons and dominated by an imperial business-banking class prepared to organise dire violence in defence of its privileges and wealth. At Lawson's graveside stood Jack Lang, the Nationalist ALP leader, who 10 years later, would be struck down by the Establishment.
The great English novelist, D.H. Lawrence, gave a glimpse of this 1920s Australia in his 1921 classic - Kangaroo. This work was an expose of the "conservative" secret armies forming across the land; he described Australia:
"...out of the silver paradisiacal freedom untamed, evil winds could come, cold like a stone hatchet murdering you. The freedom, like everything else, has two sides to it. Something like a heavy reptile hostility came off the sombre land, something gruesome and infinitely repulsive...it was as if the silvery freedom suddenly turned and showed the scaly back of the reptile and the horrible jaws..."
Henry Lawson had fought this "system" of "two faced democracy" in its infancy; 1990s Australia lives under it in its fullest maturity. As we seek our road to National Independence against a new internationalist business elite, we return to Lawson for essential inspiration.
Lawson's nationalism: A Bibliography of Verse and Prose
For those seeking a deeper appreciation of Australian Nationalism, we have provided a selective 'bibliography' of Lawson's poetry and prose under explanative subject headings. Lawson's concerns and his general perspectives thus place his theory of the state into sharp relief; Lawson's political program dictated his view of the state.
1) Eureka Stockade and the Southern Cross Flag
Lawson understood the deep historical and cultural significance of the Eureka Stockade Rebellion (1854) and its revolutionary patriotic emblem of the Southern Cross. It was the banner for an era of crisis and change.
(a) Eureka - a Fragment (1887)
(b) Flag of the Southern Cross (1887)
(c) The Fight at Eureka Stockade (1890)
(d) Australia's Forgotten Flag (1911).
2) Australia's Danger from Asia
Lawson appreciated that European Australia would in the future be under threat - military and economic - from Asia. His defence of European-Australian cultural identity and freedom was uncompromising; a major aspect of the national identity would come to defined in this struggle.
(a) Star of Australia (1895).
(b) In the Storm that is Yet to Come (1904).
(c) Nemesis (1904).
(d) The Vanguard (1905).
(e) For Australia (1905).
(f) Australia's Peril: The Warning (1905).
(g) To Be Amused (1905).
(h) The Song of Australia (1908).
3) Lawson's Patriotic Faith in the Australian promise
Lawson wrote at enormous length of the character of the land, its people, of the quality of Nationalism and of its vast potential to realise a great new Independent National Society. The following works are a few expressions of this faith.
(a) The Roaring Days (1889).
(b) Australian Loyalty (1887).
(c) As Ireland Wore the Green (1891).
(d) In the Days When the World Was Wide (1894).
(e) The Men Who Made Australia (1901).
(f) Waratah and Wattle.
4) An Australian Republic
Lawson was aware that to achieve independence, identity and a just social order, a Republic was the only state form possible for Australia; the Republic would grow from the cultural revolution and upheaval necessary to effect such dramatic change.
(a) A Song of the Republic (1887).
(b) The Statue of Our Queen (1890).
(c) The English Queen (1892).
5) A New People's Social Order
Lawson stood on the side of the ordinary Australian workers, farmers and productive middle classes; he recognised that young, wealthy, Australia endured shocking injustices. It was subject to a capitalist industrial and banking class with international connections; a revolution would overturn the economic order and a mixed state, private and co-operative economic system would supercede capitalism.
(a) Faces in the Street (1888).
(b) Army in the Rear (1888).
(c) Freedom on the Wallaby (1891).
(d) The Rebel (1891).
(e) The Old Rebel Flag in the Rear (1892).
6) The Internationalist Class State - the National State
Lawson possessed a talent for analysis. Before reviewing Lawson's analysis of Australian State power and his prescription for change, the reader can be referred to:-
(a) Nationality in Colonisation (1890).
(b) The Patriotic League (1891).
(c) Cromwell (1910).
(d) The House of Fossils (1892).
(e) A Leader of the Future (1893).
(f) The 'Lay'Em Out Brigade' (1892).
(g) The King of Our Republic (1910).
It is these works in which this article is chiefly interested. The Australian Nationalist ideology is nought if it does not aspire to state power, analyse and criticise that which is the "Australian" State and have a blueprint for a new Australian National State.
Lawson's Analysis of the "State" in Australia
Lawson did not have that "reverence" for the State common amongst 19th century Europeans. Quite the contrary: "the State" in Australia (and this included the government of the six colonies and the "Federal" construct of 1901) was the British Imperial State; it was this State through its local proxies which denied Australian independence and identity and which exploited the country economically, excluding the people from the full fruits of labour (what has changed?). The local capitalist class has always been international; firstly it was "imperial", and today it is "Asian", in sympathy. The State as founded in Australia as an "imperial" entity was Lawson's immediate enemy.
The colonial position of Lawson's Australia demanded a paradoxical Nationalism:
- an anti-authoritarian people's struggle to disintegrate the Old State and its injustices -
The was the first step, but to carry out the protection of the Nation from external dangers and to achieve its modernisation: (Australian Engineers)
- a strong but popular State would be the instrument for the conquest of freedom, wealth, independence and identity. (The King of our Republic: Cromwell)
Lawson wrote to the Imperial State in crisis:
The capitalist state was ruled by a fake democracy in a parliament:
"and tho' it shelters property and helps prop up the crown
I think it's time the toilers pulled the old museum down."
(House of Fossils 1892)
The Old State relied upon a false "patriotic" idea and would occasionally create "conservative" groups in its support:
"They took to gloss a base intrigue
A name that was demotic
They stole a name and formed a league
and called it patriotic
They've resurrected ancient lies
The world had most forgotten
The liars think the world will rise
To back a cause that's rotten." (The patriotic League 1891)
Lawson glimpsed at the falsity of "patriotic" Federation leagues as forces which did not deliver independence; he would almost certainly have grasped the essence of New Guards and Old Guards in the 1930s as 'imperial Patriots' who guaranteed finance-industrial capital (and by applying his method we can reckon modern day "republicanism" as a con to achieve "integration with Asia"). Lawson's astuteness grew from his reliance on first principles - his vision "Australia for Australians". Lawson's method should be our own.
Lawson's programme for a New State
Lawson was of course not a political theorist; rather, he was the voice of an "Australian sentiment" who put to words the yearnings of the radical Nationalists of his day. His task was to articulate (i) what it meant to be Australian, (ii) the attack upon Australianism by the wealthy classes and (iii) the call to national resistance. Nonetheless Lawson left us a sketch for an Australian National State (which the modern Nationalists are called upon to elaborate). Lawson's works give us his programme:
Australia would be a Republic with 'equality' of duties and obligations. The State would rest upon a universally armed population. The State would rest (as a result of social revolution) upon the productive classes in a new organisation ( although Lawson does not tell us how this aspect of the National State would be organised). The president would possess executive power but would be no dictator. The State would play a development role and protect the cultural heritage. The State would thus be a development-culture motor led by a national elite; but it would recognise and cherish its popular base and its roots in the people. The State, nourished by its myth of pioneer sacrifice would value the family and the woman's worth.
It is by no means surprising that Nationalists in the 1990s recognise this 100 year old program as an echo of their own. Details may differ; spirit does not.
A National State
The new Australian Nationalism would dispose of the asianising liberal-capitalist State (or 'machine' of violence against our Australian People) and create a State, articulated to represent the whole Nation. Lawson's organic concept of the Nation is our perspective.
The Nation is a living entity composed of productive classes, natural institutions and 'directed' by a State issuing from the organic facts. Lawson however warned the Nationalists of yesteryear the Old State would resist the future. Lawson wrote:
"When first this rum old world began to suffer for its sins
The tyrant and the Rebel rose, and they, we know were twins
The Rebel was "more numerous" and he and greed were foes
And so to keep him in his place the hired assassin arose
Thus when the first foundation stone of Mammon-tower was laid
The wealthy idlers organised the 'Lay'Em Out brigade'"
(The Lay'Em Out Brigade 1892)
Our 1990s Australia with 'Left' gangs, political police, Human Rights Commissions, lying media and legislative penalties-against-patriotism tells us how the State has developed into a vast machine of manipulation and repression.
But Henry Lawson left us also that other guarantee of our National State - he was the first Australian to cherish the spirit of Audacity and rebellion born at Eureka Stockade, to put what it meant into words.
It is up to us to put the words into practice.
Hiring A Attorney/Lawyer For A Speeding Ticket?
I Recently Got Pulled Over For Speeding At 56 On A 35 Road. Since I Went Over 15 Mph Over The Speed Limit, I Would Have To Appear In Court. I'Ve Searched Online And Found That Some People Advise To Hire A Attorney/Lawyer, So He/She Can Reduce The Charge, And Hopefully Keep Points Off My License. I'Ve Never Hired An Attorney/Lawyer For Anything In My Life. So I Want To Know If There'S Anything I Should Keep In Mind While Hiring One? Is There Some Etiquette? Is There Something Specific I Should Ask/Check For When Hiring A Attorney/Lawyer? I'M Really Sort Of Lost On How To Approach This.
I Didn'T Know Where To Post This Question Exactly, So I Apologize If This Is In The Wrong Section. I Picked This One Because It'S The One They Reccomended.
As JoshAsk stated you don't need a lawyer to get the ticket reduced. You can try what he did and that may work. What I did for my tickets was this. I wrote a letter to the DA of that court and simply asked for a reduction. I stated that I was willing to plead guilty to a lesser charge. On 2 separate tickets in the same court the DA reduced the charge. I didn't even have to go to court. This is essentially what a lawyer does for you and this way you don't have to pay the lawyer some fees. Either way you will have to pay the fine. You may get stuck with some points but a lawyer isn't necessarily going to get rid of the points.
How Difficult Is It To Overturn A Child Custody Case?
I Am Military Stationed Overseas And I Had A Divorce Finalized A Year Ago. In That Decree My Wife Was Rewarded Custody Of Our Child Who Is 5. Recently My Wife'S Boyfriend Was Arrested On A Second Offense Of Prostitution Solicitation. Would This Be Grounds To Reopen The Case In Hopes Of A Reverse Decision For Me To Get Custody Of Our Son?
Probably not. Those cases are really hard for men to win. You would have to prove the mother unfit. Unfortunately what her boyfriend was doing doesn't matter, because he probably wasn't doing it around the child, so the child wasn't in harms way. I just went through a custody battle with my ex, it was horrible. A lawyer will tell you that you have a chance and he can win the case, just to drain you of all your money.
Why Does The Standard Of Proof In Criminal Law Cases Set Such A High Bar In Comparison To Civil Law Cases?
Because the penalties are so much more severe in criminal cases than in civil cases.
For example, civil cases can never end with a penalty of imprisonment -- an extremely severe penalty.
@ All: Arizona Law: Perfectly Legal ... But Will It Work?
The First Good Critique I Have Seen From A Doubter Of The Arizona Law Comes From My Friend Bill West, Who Used To Be A Top Federal Immigration Official In Florida. Bill Agrees With Me That There Is No Valid Legal Objection To The New State Statute. His Reservation Is Practical: In Most Cases Involving Brief Police Stops To Investigate Criminal Activity That Is Not Particularly Serious, It Won'T Work; And In Most Cases Involving Arrests For Serious Offenses, It Is Superfluous.
As Usual, The Problem Is The Federal Government. As Bill Explains It To Me, He Doesn'T Think The Law Will Work Because:
The Immigration System – That Record System That Arizona Law Enforcement Officers Are Supposed To Rely Upon To &Quot;Verify&Quot; Illegal Status Under 8 Usc 1373(C) – Is Unreliable And Ineffective....Http://Libertypost.Org/Cgi-Bin/Readart.Cgi?Artnum=288448
i have some small reservations about the act, though nothing to do with the legality of it but more to be with the practical side of applying it. (and i'm just throwing them out there for you all to consider as 'what may happens')
firstly as you have already mentioned the whole thing rests on the support and information given to the people on the ground, and as already mentioned by you, that is lacking or at least not 100% reliable.
secondly, sooner or later a latino-american citizen or organisation will take this act to court on racial discrimination lines, (because plenty of Mexican-American citizens will be stopped again and again)
now to stop this happening there are two main 'work arounds'
1) you simply have the act but don't use it
2) you ensure that non latinos are also checked - while the vast majority of illegals in Arizona are Mexican/South American a small minority will be from Europe, Africa/West Indies, Asia etc.
which means in practise the people on the ground having to work to a quota system,
i.e for every 100 people you stop, 90 can be south of the border 'looking' - 7-8 can be black and 2-3 White/Asian etc.
(and they will base any quota figure on previous statistics of people deported from Arizona in any given year, what percentage came from south of the Border, Europe etc, etc, if 100% of all illegals returned in one year happen to be from south of the border then so be it, but the fact is it won't because there will always be a few who mess things up)
What this allows, is for the state to present proof in court that it this act is not anti-Mexican/Latino, because they will be have stats that will say, for example
in the first 3 months of the year, we stopped X amount of people of these we found 1000 illegals, of this figure 900 were from nations south of the border, 90 were from African Nations and the rest from Europe and Asia. (thus the state shows it is being even handed and the state can not be held legally responsible if the bulk of the illegals happen to be from Mexico)
So my reservation is, should Arizona adopt a quota system, how will the white citizens of the state feel when they are being stopped, purely so some cop can meet his quota?
(the act is about finding illegal immigrants, it doesn't specify that they have to be mexican, and several European nations have very similar acts that all end up on the quota system sooner or later)