Finding An Experienced Lawyer Regardless of what your legal needs are you will notice that there are numerous lawyers in your neighborhood that advertise that they can concentrate on your type of case. This may make the entire process of finding one with significant amounts of experience somewhat of a challenge. However, when you follow the following it is possible to narrow down your research off to the right one in very little time. Step one is to generate a set of the lawyers which are listed in your neighborhood focusing on your circumstances. When you are making this list you must only include those that you have a good vibe about based on their advertisement. After that you can narrow this list down by using a bit of time evaluating their site. There you should be able to find the number of years they have been practicing and some general details about their success rates. At this stage your list needs to have shrunken further to people which you felt had professional websites as well as an appropriate level of experience. You ought to then make time to look up independent reviews of every attorney. Make sure to browse the reviews rather than relying on their overall rating. The details inside the reviews will provide you with a sense of the way that they communicate with their clients and the time they invest into each case that they are working on. Finally, you will need to talk to at least the very last three lawyers that have the credentials you are searching for. This gives you time to actually evaluate how interested they may be in representing you and the case. It really is important to follow many of these steps to ensure that you find a person which includes the correct degree of experience to get you the best possible outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Car Insurance And Attorney?
I Need Help In Selecting An Attorney! I Had Insurance On My Truck...Long Story Short... It Was Stolen,Found And Considered Total Loss And The Insurance Company Offered To Pay For The Truck But Not For Any Aftermarket Items! (Stereo System Over $4000!) The Aftermarket Items Were In The Policy Before My Truck Got Stolen And I Was Told That Since The Truck Was Considered Total Loss That They Wouldnt Pay For Anything Else! I Checked The Contract And There Is Nothing That Says That They Wouldnt Pay For Aftermarket Items Incase Of A Total Loss...... What Steps Should I Take To Attemp To Get Paid For The Truck And The Aftemarket Items??????? What Kind Of Attorney/Lawyer Should I Contact???????
Lawyers love to hate insurance companies. With the exception of other lawyers, there is nobody they'd rather sue. If you walk into any lawyer's office and tell them you want to sue your insurer, they're going to smile and say "no problem" before they even ask why.
But keep one thing in mind: In most lawsuits (injuries are a different matter), the lawyer still gets paid if you lose. And you can lose. Before your lawyer says "no problem", you'll want to veify a couple of things.
First, check out exactly where your aftermarket parts were mentioned on the policy - and if any extra premium was charged for them. When insurers cover expensive aftermarket parts on a vehicle, they usually charge for it. If you see a premium charged for any increased value, you've got them dead to rights.
Next, go into the policy wording itself. Not your declaration pages and billing statement, the entire insuring agreement. If you don't have one, ask the insurer for a copy and they have to provide it for you. You'll want to look at the exclusions (loss or damage not insured), limitations, statutory conditions, and available endorsements. It's going to take a while, but look for anything mentioning after-market equipment of any kind and see what it says.
In most states and provinces, additional / upgrade equipment is not automatically included in the policy. It doesn't matter that this stuff was installed on the vehicle when they started insuring you, because they're only covering the original vehicle in the contract. Some places have automatic limits for extra equipment, but just about everywhere has it written that covering extra value means they charge extra premiums.
I'm only suggesting that you look into this because a lawyer costs a lot more per hour than you do. And lawyers always get paid.
Why Is Legislation / Employment Law Important In Upholding And Protecting The Rights Of Both Employer/Employee
This Is Part Of My &Quot;Work Within Your Business Environment&Quot; Study For A Degree. I Need Some Brainstorming Ideas Here...
Employment Law is a very complicated field of law. It is also very misunderstood.
Employment law in the United Kingdom
During much of the Nineteenth century the employment contract was based on the Master and Servant Act of 1823, designed to discipline employees and repress the 'combination' of workers in Trade unions.
Employment Law in the United Kingdom has developed rapidly over the past forty years, due to a historically strong Trades Union movement and to the United Kingdom's membership of the European Union. In its current form, it is largely a creature of Statute, (Acts of the UK Parliament) rather than Common Law.
Leading Employment Law Statutes include the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Employment Act 2002 and various legislative provisions outlawing discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion and, from 2006, age.
Unusually for UK legislation, the operation of the Employment Law system is broadly similar across the whole of the UK. There are some differences in the common law between England & Wales and Scotland and, in addition, Northern Ireland has extra anti-discrimination legislation.
Summary of Internal Employer's Process
After the employer's own processes, such as disciplinary hearings and internal appeals, have been exhausted, employment law cases usually start by the aggrieved employee presenting a complaint to an Employment Tribunal (ET). These (as Industrial Tribunals) were set up under the 1964 Industrial Training Act, although they now have a substantially greater role and do count as courts. They have sometimes been referred to as industrial juries.
Northern Ireland offers a Fair Employment Tribunal and an Industrial Tribunal. These are administered by OITFET - the Office of the Industrial Tribunal and the Fair Employment Tribunal.
As from 1st October 2004, both employers and employees will be required to follow a statutory dispute resolution procedure when effecting dismissals or dealing with grievances. A failure by the employer to follow the procedure results in the dismissal being automatically unfair and an enhancement in any compensation payable to the employee. A failure by the employee in following the procedure results in a possible bar to bringing tribunal claims or a reduction in any compensation payable.
Summary of Tribunal Process
Generally speaking a tribunal will hear specific complaints about an aggrieved party being deprived of their rights, including (but not limited to) unfair dismissal.
In short, a claim is submitted, a response is required by a certain deadline, any preliminary issues are dealt with at a case management conference or a pre-hearing review, a period of time is allowed for ACAS (UK) or the LRA (NI) to explore settlement options, and then the tribunal orders are sent out after the ACAS conciliation period has expired leading to a full merits hearing of one or more days. Complex cases that are not resolved in one day are carried over to a remedy hearing at a later date to discuss the award only. A judgment is then sent out with the parties given 14 days to ask for written reasons behind the decision (unless they ask on the day).
Complaints to Tribunal and Time Limits
A complaint of unfair dismissal can only be made where there has been a dismissal, so that there is no general right to complain of unfair treatment. An employee may, however, complain at any time that they consider a statutory 'employment protection' right has been infringed. Where this takes place in connection with a dismissal an employee may combine this with their complaint against the dismissal.
Except where no qualifying time limit applies (as in the case of 'statutory rights') an employee needs to have worked for their employer for a least a year in order to make a complaint of unfair dismissal to an employment tribunal. In addition, a claimant may raise a complaint of discrimination without claiming dismissal or whilst also claiming dismissal but without one year of service. Claimant's with less than one year's service may find their unfair dismissal claim is brought to a pre-hearing review where they are asked to explain why they feel they can bring a claim without a year's service, i.e. dismissal due to a public interest disclosure or for being a trade union member. Most tribunal offices however write to the claimant upon receipt of their claim form telling them that they have 14 days to show why their claim should be heard, otherwise the chairman will strike out the claim.
In certain circumstances, an employer's conduct could be such that an employee is entitled to resign in response and to regard that as an unfair "constructive" dismissal. Failure by an employer to extend a fixed term contract can also be an instance where a claim for unfair dismissal may be made.
Employment regulations play a key role in the development of any business. Sometimes, building a team with complementary skills involves little more than a quick chat with someone who has been introduced to them by a business associate. No psychometric tests, references or formal contracts of employment here.
Often, employees or team members are taken on without sufficient protection in terms of valuable intellectual property or a means to prevent ´moonlighting´or unfair competition when they leave.
Emerging businesses and entrepreneurs can have the basis of a fantastic business, but, once they start employing people, things can go wrong.
Employees can rip companies off by stealing their ideas or passing them on to subsequent employers, who have not invested heavily in the underlying research and development.
Even if employees do not take ideas or indulge in unfair competition, poor performance can itself damage the business.
Not only that but any attempt to discipline or improve the errant employees can lead to employment tribunal claims, where, for example, unlimited damages can be awarded where discrimination is proved.
The year 2003/4 saw 115,000 employment tribunal claims in the UK, of which over 31,000 resulted in a hearing. Any trouble like this is inevitably a very disruptive and costly event for any business with limited management resources.
The stakes are high. Though the average settlement was £7,275, some race and sex discrimination claims resulted in awards against employers of around the £0.5m mark.
Traditionally, smaller and emerging businesses have adopted a reactive approach. Employment lawyers are called in when an errant employee claims the rights to technology developed in his or her employment or where a tribunal claim is threatened.
It is much better to make sure that he or she has the necessary employment contracts in place and the appropriate procedures.
Contracts should specifically address the issue of research and development and who owns the rights to such material etc. Normally, this will be the employer, but it is unwise to rely solely on this generalisation.
The procedures covered should include those for grievances and disciplinary matters. Commonly, equal opportunities, bullying, harassment and even the use of company emails are also covered.
From stealing ideas and information through to the incorrect use of emails, the risks are significant.
For further information please refer to the below Source List
Getting Into Law School With High Gpa And Low Lsat?
I Have A Gpa 3.9 From Uc Berkeley. I Am Taking The Lsat In Several Days, But Am Not Prepared Well Since I Have An Infant At Home And I'M Taking A Full Load Of Classes. I Don'T Think I Can Score Higher Than A 145/148. What Are My Chances Of Getting Into Boalt, Stanford, Or Hastings Law Schools?
How to Get Into Law School with a Low LSAT Score
The first thing that you should know is that students who do well on the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) usually tend to do better in law school because they are logical thinkers. However, it has been reflected time and time again that students with lower LSAT scores can still perfectly master law school. It all comes down to how much you want to succeed, and how hard you are willing to work for what you want. Don't let a low LSAT score stop you from going to law school.
Go to the LSAT website and utilize the GPA & LSAT analyzer tool to find out which law schools will take you with a low LSAT score. If you don’t know how to do this, you should read the article titled “How to find Law Schools who will Accept Low LSAT Scores.”
Contact the admissions director at the schools to which you are applying. Be completely honest about your low LSAT score and anything else that may be of concern. Take heed to all of their advice. DO NOT rely on law school admissions advice from anyone unless they are law school admissions personnel, LSAC personnel or someone who has actually gained admittance to law school at one point or another.
Target the professors that you would like to utilize to write your law school references. Work really hard for them and show them your worth. Make sure that you ASK them what they think of your academic performance before you ask them to write the letter of recommendation. You would be surprised at the amount of people who ask a professor to write a letter or recommendation only to have a letter of “no confidence” written.
If your LSAT score is extremely low, you should consider re-taking the exam. Read the article titled “How to Get a High LSAT Score,” which can be found by clicking the appropriate link below. Good Luck!
Improve Your LSAT Score
Thousands have discovered that Examkrackers is the way to prepare
Washington College of Law
Continuing Legal Education Seminars Scholars Discuss Legal Issues
Improving Test Scores
Founded by Harvard Graduate Focused SAT & K-12 Test Prep
Law School Admission
Former law school admissions officers from top 10 law schools!
What Year Did George W Bush Get Arrested For Driving Under The Influence?
There are a number of accounts of substance abuse and otherwise disorderly conduct by Bush from this time. Bush has admitted to drinking "too much" in those years and described this period of his life as his "nomadic" period of "irresponsible youth". On September 4, 1976, at the age of 30, Bush was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) near his family's summer home in Kennebunkport, Maine. He pled guilty, was fined US$150, and had his driver's license suspended in Maine until 1978.
But Hatfield quotes "a high-ranking advisor to Bush" who confirmed that Bush was arrested for cocaine possession in Houston in 1972, and had the record expunged by a judge who was "a fellow Republican and elected official" who helped Bush get off "with a little community service at a minority youth center instead of having to pick cotton on a Texas prison farm."
Why didn't we hear about this when he was running for President?
What Can A Lawyer Do That An Attorney At Law Can'T?
I Never Really Understood The Difference Between A Lawyer And An Attorney At Law. So Feel Free To Explain That To Me As Well!
Nothing. They are exactly the same thing!
Need To Find The Phone Number And Or Web Site For One Steven Sketch Social Security Attorney At Law.?