Finding A Skilled Lawyer No matter what your legal needs are you will find that there are many lawyers in your town that advertise that they can specialize in your sort of case. This could make the whole process of finding one with a lot of experience a bit of a challenge. However, should you follow the following it will be easy to restrict your search to the correct one in almost no time. The first step is to produce a set of the lawyers which are listed in your town that specialize in your circumstances. When you are which makes this list you ought to only include those that you may have a great vibe about based upon their advertisement. You can then narrow this list down by using a bit of time evaluating their internet site. There you should certainly find the number of years they have been practicing plus some general information regarding their success rates. At this time your list ought to have shrunken further to those that you just felt had professional websites along with an appropriate level of experience. You ought to then take time to lookup independent reviews of each and every attorney. Make sure to see the reviews rather than relying upon their overall rating. The information within the reviews will provide you with a concept of how they connect with their customers and how much time they invest into each case that they are concentrating on. Finally, it is advisable to meet up with no less than the past three lawyers who have the credentials you would like. This will provide you with some time to actually evaluate how interested they can be in representing you and your case. It can be vital that you follow every one of these steps to actually find someone that has the best level of experience to get you the ideal outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
What Is The Difference Between Attorney-At-Law, And Esquire?
An "Attorney-at-law" is simply one who is authorized to practice law. "Esquire" has no legal significance. It derives from the British peerage system indicating one bearing the rank above a "gentlemen" but below a Knight. In modern usage, is means a lawyer, but there is no law of peerage in the U.S. and all citizens are equal in the eyes of the law and so the claim of a title or rank is meaningless.
Why Would A Lawyer Present Litigation To A Judge During Sentencing?
My Daughter Was Found Guilty For A Class X Felony. Her Sentecing Was Postponed 3 Times. Her Lawyer Is Slow,,,He'S Going To Present Litagation To The Judge At The Sentencing And Also Have Family Speak At The Sentencing . Help! What'S Going On? She Was Interviewed By The Probation Department. I'M Just So Confused.
Your daughter's lawyer is going to present mitigation at her sentencing hearing. Basically, mitigation consists of family history, life history, etc. The lawyer is trying to present evidence to give the judge a full picture of your daughter and her life so that he can make an informed sentencing decision. My guess is he's trying to get the judge to grant probation instead of sentencing your daughter to serve time or, at the very least, is trying to get a reduced sentence.
Question On Criminal Defense Law.?
Every Time I Bring Up An Interest In Pursuing Law School And A Career In Criminal Law, I Hear The Same Broken Record. People Seem Fixated On The Idea That Criminal Defense Lawyers Rigorously Try Acquit People They Know Are Guilty. I'Ve Never Taken An Ethics Class And I Don'T Know The Laws, But Is This True?
Are Lawyers Supposed To Receive Admissions Of Guilt From Their Client? If A Client Confesses To His/Her Representation, Wouldn'T That Make It Unethical To Submit A Plea Of Not Guilty? For Some Reason, I Have It In My Head That Clients, If Guilty, Are Supposed To Tell Everything But The Dirty Deed For Best Representation. Any Thoughts? Thanks In Advance!
I'M Not Biased For/Against Defense Lawyers. It'S Not My Area Of Interest, But It Is Interesting Area Of Ethics Nonetheless!
There's an old adage that the first client of the criminal defense attorney is the US Constitution.
Most criminal defense lawyers don't care whether their clients are guilty or not. They just want to ensure that the police and the prosecutors have done their jobs properly and ensure the criminal justice system is working. If they lose at trial, but are satisfied the the police and prosecutors did everything by the book, they generally don't take it too hard. If the defense thinks a conviction is imminent, they will generally try a plea bargain to receive a lesser sentence for their client. Before anyone makes any judgment's about the criminal defense attorney "trying to get his client off with a slap on the wrist", they should also realize that the prosecutor has to agree to the deal, and the judge has to approve it. So if anyone is ever upset with a plea bargain, they need to realize that if the judge and prosecutor went along with it, its probably in the state's best interest as well.
But to answer your question, see below.
ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal
(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
(b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
(c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6.
So if a client confesses guilt to his lawyer, the above rule prohibits the lawyer from putting the client on the stand (refered to as "subornation of perjury"). If the lawyer knows the client is guilty, and the client doesn't plead guilty, the case goes to trial. At trial, the lawyer can't put the client on the stand, because the lawyer knows the client will lie about his or her innocence once they are on the stand. This is why defense lawyers don't care whether their clients are guilty or not, and why they specifically tell their clients not to tell them if they are guilty or not. They don't want to know, so they can put them on the stand.
Believe it or not, this rule is almost never violated. No lawyer would ever risk losing his license because his or her client is a liar.
And remember, OJ didn't take the stand. Draw your own conclusion....
Do I Need To Talk To A Real Estate Lawyer?
I Put A $5000 Deposit On A Townhouse That I Want To Buy. There Is A Tenant In It, Her Lease Is Not Up Until Novenber. We Were Going To Close By The End Of The Month. I Was Going To Let The Tenant Stay Until Her Lease Is Up. Someone Told Me To Think About It First.
What If When Nov. Comes And She Does Not Want To Leave. And Also, What If She Stops Paying Her Rent. She Has A Little Girl And I Know Sometimes It Can Take Up To A Year To Get People Out.
I Am Afraid Of Losing The House Before I Even Move In.
So, Now I Have Told My Realtor That I Want The Owners To Get Her Out Before The Closing. I Am Willing To Wait Until Nov. When Her Lease Is Up. I Should Also Say That My Mortage Guy Knows Nothing About That Fact That There Is A Tenant In The House. My Realtor Said That It Would Be Better Not To Tell Him.
I Don'T Want To Lose My Deposit. And I Would Like To Buy The House. So Far There Is No Lawers Involved. The Owners Were Not Going To Use A Lawyer. Do I Need To Talk To One?
If you are ever not sure about a real estate transaction talk to a lawyer. Have the lawyer read the lease, you and the tenant both have to honor the current lease. If she doesn't pay then you evict like any landlord, and she has to move out when the lease is up. Your Realtor told you not to tell your lender about the tenant because the property probably has to be "owner occupied" or you pay a higher interest rate. You should also point that out to the attorney, if the lender finds out a tenant is there your payment could go up to about 1% of the homes value each month.
Why Is It Better To Work For A Smaller Law Firm?
1) You will get to do real lawyer's work much sooner. In a small general practice firm, you will probably end up in court, and writing the actual motions and responses in your first month, taking depositions within three to six months, and so forth. Your cases will likely be smaller, so that the consequences aren't as severe if you screw up, but you will be doing a lot of independent work. You won't be completely on your own, if the supervising attorneys have any conscience (or brains), but you will not be locked in a library doing issue research without even knowing any of the facts of the case.
2) The downside is that you will make less money, usually, and have to do a lot of your own scut work, some of which you can't bill the clients for. The upside is that your hours will likely be far more manageable at a smalll firm, and you will make friends with other lawyers in town quicker, since you will actually be seeing them in court, and making deals with them on the telephone, etc.
In short, at a small firm, you will quickly feel like a real lawyer, and act like one, rather than being a galley slave to a "senior partner."
Nurse Or Lawyer ??? Please Help !!!?
So I'Ve Been Lately Disheartened To Pursue My Childhood Dream Of Becoming A Lawyer. I Do Not Want To Go To Law School In Vain. I Know That The Demand For Lawyers Is Very Low. I Have Wanted To Become A Lawyer Since I Was Younger. I Am Now A Senior In High School Thinking Of Reconsidering My Life Goal. My Question To All Of You Is : Should I Go To School To Become A Lawyer Or An Ob/Gyn Nurse Practitioner ?
You want to be a lawyer, so go for it. Demand for lawyers isn't low, but most people can't afford them. Consider starting your own law practice and make it affordable.
You could do it this way: Get your undergrad degree in nursing, a BSN. You will get to take some elective courses, so you can take things to prep for law school, such as logic, psychology, political science, and business.
Once you're ready to apply for grad school, you'll know whether you really want to continue on in nursing, or whether it's still law for you. And if you are one of the ones who isn't snapped up by a law firm, you'll have the nursing to fall back on. On the other hand, your knowledge of nursing will give you an edge if you go into medicine/healthcare-related law.