3 Approaches To Know You've Picked The Right Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to go through the court system, particularly if lack confidence in your legal team. Listed below are three important ways to understand that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Focus On Your Kind Of Case What the law states is often tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you want an attorney, try to find one that works with the issue you're facing. Even though a member of family or friend recommends you utilize a firm they are fully aware, should they don't have a focus that's similar to your case, keep looking. Once your attorney is an expert, especially in the hassle you're facing, you already know you've hired the right choice. 2. The Lawyer Has A Winning Record Dependant upon the circumstances, it can be difficult to win an instance, particularly if the team helping you has minimal to no experience. Look for practices that have won numerous cases that apply to yours. Although this is no guarantee that you simply case will probably be won, it gives you a better shot. 3. They Listen And Respond When the attorney you've chosen takes the time to listen for your concerns and answer your inquiries, you've probably hired the right choice. Irrespective of how busy they are or how small your concerns seem from their perspective, it's critical that they answer you in the caring and timely manner. From the aim of view of an ordinary citizen who isn't informed about the judicial system, court cases can be pretty scary you need updates as well as feel as if you're part of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to you and the case as opposed to others. Ensure you've hired the best team for your personal circumstances, to actually can placed the matter behind you as quickly as possible. Faith with your legal representative is step one to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Does A Criminal Lawyer Make More Than A Civil Lawyer In General?
Or Is I T The Other Way Around? And Is A Bar Test Really Hard ?
To get an accurate answer, you really should specify where you are ... at least in what country. I'll just wantonly assume you're in the US.
First: the division of lawyers into "criminal" and "civil" isn't really very informative. The number of lawyers who do primarily criminal work is very small. The vast majority of lawyers have nothing to do with the criminal justice system ... indeed, very many of them don't do litigation at all. And there are some lawyers who do both civil and criminal litigation.
The number of criminal lawyers who make an unusually large amount of money is even smaller: some big-name white-collar defense attorneys, mob lawyers, and a few practitioners who are highly capable both at doing the work and at self-publicity. Some people who do run-of-the-mill things like DUIs do fairly well, just by doing lots of the same thing over and over very efficiently. Public defenders, in most places, make about the same level of income which drove their clients to crime in the first place. Prosecutors make fairly modest salaries, though some of them are in the job as a stepping stone to something else.
The bar exam isn't really hard. The vast majority of applicants pass it. It is fairly long.
Legal Question-Sorry So Long!?
My Husband And I Own A Construction Company And We Have Never Had Any Issues With Our Clients Until Recently. We Have A Contract With A Client And They Continued Making Upgrades And Changes. This Is A Large Job And They Had Been Making Their Installment Payments So We Started The Upgrades And Changes Without Updating The Contract. We Generated An Invoice Including All The Upgrades And Changes, They Had Many Questions In Regards To The New Price. For Weeks We Explained The Prices Of The Upgrades And Changes And They Final Agreed And They Made 2 Additional Installment Payments. Now There Are Only Two Payments Due And A Few Weeks Away From Completion Of The Job. They Refused To Pay Claiming We Are Over Pricing Them, Even Though They Have Paid Half The Invoice. At This Time We Are Only Requesting 1 Payment And The Last Payment Upon Completion Of The Job. We Have Ceased Work Due To Non-Payment. When We Showed Up To Retrieve Our Tools, They Refused To Allow Us On The Property. Can They Do This? We Contacted A Lawyer And The Retainer Is Crazy Expensive, We Are A Small Construction Company And With The Bad Economy We Can'T Afford To Just Shell Out This Kind Of Money. Any Suggestions
I am a construction litigation paralegal. You need an attorney. Hands down. I deal with this every day and I can tell you that this situation will get worse. Shop around for attorneys and find one that specializes in construction litigation. Go to your state's bar association website. They should have an attorney finder. Keep making calls until you can find one with a reasonable retainer. Just from your facts, you made a ton of costly mistakes. Each upgrade and change should have been documented as a change order. If you have an invoice with their signature noting they knew of the changes and accepted them, it may be enough. It honestly sounds like you need a contract review so that you are protected from this. It sounds like you haven't been sending proper notices, sounds like you have no idea about mechanic and materialman's liens.
HIRE AN ATTORNEY. Find one you can afford otherwise these people will end up taking your business away from you.
**EDIT** - There is no use putting a lien on the job if you did not adhere to statutory regulations. Your lien will be shot down and you may be liable for the other side's attorney's fees. SEE AN ATTORNEY.
Why Do Some Attorneys Answer Their Phone &Quot;Law Offices&Quot; Instead Of Just Saying Their Name Or Their Firm Name?
I used to do front desk duty at a fairly busy law office. I always answered the phone with "Legal Office," and my name.
Guess what the first question people often asked was?
"Uh, is this the legal office?"
If they're that unsure who they're calling when specifically given the information, why confuse them by just saying a name?
Question : Reckless Driving, Need A Lawyer?
I Am 21 This Is My First Speeding Ticket: I Was Caught Doing 52 In A 30 Zone In Richmond,Virginia--The City Part. I Was Not Feeling Well (Doesn'T Excuse What I Did) And Even Told The Cop That I Think I Was Having Food Poisoning --He Did Not Care. I Went To The Doctor I Can Confirm This Even Though I Know This Won'T Matter Either.
I Went To Driving School For The 1St Time 3 Years Ago, But My Record Is Clean Otherwise.
Do I Need A Lawyer?
Also On My Ticket He (The Cop) Said I Was A White Female And I'M Not I Am Black Female And It Does Not Include The Time This All Took Place.
You do not need a lawyer at all unless you want to fight the ticket...however that will probably be a lost cause considering you admit to and were speeding. The whole discrepency with your race is irrelevant. Unless he completely writes your name wrong or misidentifies you, it won't matter. You can still be found and all your information is there. More than likely you'll have to pay a fine, court costs, and have to do some sort of defensive driving class and that may clear your record. It's unfortunate and quite time consuming, but it's not a huge deal.
As for your insurance, it may not matter to them or it may go up. If you are ordered to take the defensive driving, TAKE IT. There is a recipt that you are able to mail in to your insurance and if your driving record remains clean because you were able to dismiss this case, then your insurance will see that you took defensive driving and you may be eligible for a discount!
Legal Advice: Abandonment Of Property??
I Went To The St. Louis Arch The Other Day, And Had A Small Pocket Knife I Carry With Me Almost Everywhere. I Saw A Sign That Said No Weapons Could Enter The Arch, So I Hid The Knife In A Small Cabinet By The Front Door Where They Have Literature About The Arch. When I Left, I Went To Look And Found No Knife. It Was No Big Deal, So I'M Leaving And I'M Telling My Little Brother It'S Not There When I'M Approached By One Of The Security Guys There. He Overheard Me And I Was Honest And Told Him What Happened, So He Gives Me A Federal Citation For 'Abandonment Of Property'. They Never Saw Or Found The Knife, All They Know Is I Said I Did It. The Security Guy Was Being A Jerk And Treating Me Like A Criminal That Was Leaving Grenades Around Or Something, And Was Obviously On A Power Trip And Needed Excitement. Now I Can Pay $125 Or Go To Court, I Plan To Go To Court But Can Anybody Give Me Any Advice On This? How To Fight It? Anybody Had This Problem Before? Thanks
Enter a plea of not guilty. Then as trial time approaches, file for a continuance. File for as many continuances as possible, in order to delay the trial as long as possible. By the time you have to show up, its fairly likely that that cop wont even show up. If he doesnt- case dismissed. Its also likely he will have started forgetting facts of the case, which helps your chances of winning. If he does show up, then ask him basic questions like, did you see me do it? Did you find a knife as evidence? Etc. It might get thrown out. But dont lie- if none of that works, you're probably going to have to pay a fine + court costs- since you did admit to it, and I assume you wont be purguring yourself.
Compare And Contrast Criminal Law And Case Law.?
Help! Im Writting A Paper And I Need Some Input...
The Constitution of the United States mentions three areas of jurisdiction in which the courts may operate:
Common Law is based on God's law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, " BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS - IT'S THE LAW. " This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT , and is punishable.
Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this can only be a civil action - not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by the court, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws, Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract.
This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force.
However, the courts don't want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case - that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it, Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.