3 Ways To Know You've Picked The Correct Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to go through the court system, particularly if lack confidence with your legal team. Here are three important strategies to know that you've hired the best lawyer: 1. They Are Experts In Your Sort Of Case The law is usually tricky and therefore requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you want a legal representative, seek out person who relates to the matter you're facing. Even if a family member or friend recommends you utilize a good they are fully aware, if they don't have got a focus that's similar to your case, keep looking. As soon as your attorney is definitely an expert, specifically in the difficulty you're facing, you already know you've hired the right one. 2. The Lawyer Has A Winning Record Based on the circumstances, it can be challenging to win a case, specifically if the team helping you has minimal to no experience. Search for practices which have won numerous cases that affect yours. While this is no guarantee that you simply case is going to be won, it will give you a far greater shot. 3. They Listen And Respond In the event the attorney you've chosen takes time to listen for your concerns and respond to your inquiries, you've probably hired the best one. Irrespective of how busy they may be or how small your concerns seem off their perspective, it's essential that they answer you in a caring and timely manner. From the purpose of view of an ordinary citizen who isn't knowledgeable about the judicial system, court cases can be pretty scary you will need updates as well as think that you're portion of the solution. Some attorneys are just considerably better to you and your case as opposed to others. Make sure you've hired the best team to your circumstances, to actually can position the matter behind you as soon as possible. Faith with your legal representative is the initial step to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Ten Points!!!!! Legal Question....?
Which Document Is Written Persuaviely And Which Is Written Objectively?
A Brief And A Memorandum Of Law....
Blahh I Searched All Over, I Don'T Think I'M Looking In The Right Places....
Thank You For Your Help
Categories of legal writing
Legal writing is of two, broad categories: (i) legal analysis and (ii) legal drafting. Legal analysis is two-fold: (1) predictive analysis, and (2) persuasive analysis. In the United States, in most law schools students must learn legal writing; the courses focus on: (1) predictive analysis, i.e., an outcome-predicting memorandum (positive or negative) of a given action for the attorney's client; and (2) persuasive analysis, e.g., motions and briefs. Although not as widely taught in law schools, legal drafting courses exist; other types of legal writing concentrate upon writing appeals or on interdisciplinary aspects of persuasion.
Predictive legal analysis
The legal memorandum is the most common type of predictive legal analysis; it may include the client letter or legal opinion. The legal memorandum predicts the outcome of a legal question by analyzing the authorities governing the question and the relevant facts that gave rise to the legal question. It explains and applies the authorities in predicting an outcome, and ends with advice and recommendations. The legal memorandum also serves as record of the research done for a given legal question. Traditionally, and to meet the legal reader's expectations, it is formally organized and written.
Persuasive legal analysis
The persuasive document, a motion or a brief, attempts to persuade a deciding authority to favourably decide the dispute for the author's client. Motions and briefs are usually submitted to judges, but also to mediators, arbitrators, and others. In addition a persuasive letter may attempt to persuade the dispute's opposing party.
Persuasive writing is the most rhetorically stylised. So although a brief states the legal issues, describes authorities, and applies authorities to the question--as does a memorandum--the brief's application portion is framed as an argument. The author argues for one approach to resolving the legal matter and does not present a neutral analysis.
Minor Criminal Charges????
If A Cop Arrests A Minor Without Saying Miranda Rights , Can The Charges Be Dropped At Court? And If The Cop Didn'T Reveal Their Badge Number And State Their Name? And If They Took Pictures And Fingerprints Of Minors?
>If a cop arrests a minor without saying Miranda Rights , can the charges be dropped at court?
NO!!! The cop isn't counting on your testimony for a conviction the store is going to provide ALL the evidence they need to convict. It is VERY RARE for a failure to Mirandize to result in charges being dropped especially since they don't have Mirandize every person they arrest.
"The duty to warn only arises when police officers conduct custodial interrogations. The Constitution does not require that a defendant be advised of the Miranda rights as part of the arrest procedure, or once officer has probable cause to arrest, or if the defendant has become a suspect of the focus of an investigation. Custody and interrogation are the events that trigger the duty to warn."
Can A Refuse To Pay A Lawyer?
I Hired A Lawyer To Represent Me. I Basically Filed A Motion And Then Hired Her After My Failed Attempts, Thinking Having A “Professional” Would Help My Case. I Agreed And Paid $1000 Retainer Fee For Her Services. I Gave Her Basically Everything She Needed For The Case. The Motion I Filed, Etc. Upon Going To Court She Obviously Didn’T Care Because She Was Asking Me Questions In Court That I Told Her Several Times Before. Anyways She Has Charged Me Additional $150.00 For A Service That I Don’T See Justified She Didn’T Do Anything Or Get Anywhere Like She Promised. I Did Pay Her For Her Services Already But Don'T See How She Can Even Charge Me Extra For Nothing. If I Refuse To Pay This Extra Charge To Her Am I Getting Myself Into More Trouble Than I Want? I Understand These People Are Independent Contractors And I Only Had A Verbal Agreement With Her No Contract. So Basically It’S Her Word Vs. Mine If She Wants To Take Me To Court, Etc. I Feel These &Quot;People&Quot; Bully Alot Of Us Since They Know The Law And Get Away With Things By Using Big Words Or Legal Action Words. Please Help...
Notwithstanding what Lucy said, not all jurisdictions require that fee arrangements for lawyer services be in writing. However, any competent attorney will require one for their own protection. Ask the lawyer for a copy of your signed retainer letter (or if you are recalling now that you did sign one take a look at it). Not all matters are billed out by the hour. Solo practitioners and small practices will often offer a variety of flat fee services depending on the nature of the matter although it is rare for them to do so for a trial which is usually billed either on an hourly basis or a contingent fee basis.
If your retainer letter states that the $1,000 was a retainer for legal services to be billed on an hourly basis then you are liable for whatever time she spent on your matter. If it states that it is a flat fee arrangement for representation not including filing fees or disbursements you may owe her the $150. If it states that is a flat fee for representation including filing fees and disbursements then you owe her nothing.
If you are being billed by the hour your are entitled to a detailed accounting of the time she spent on your matter and should ask for it and if you see something that seems excessive in terms of time then you can bring it to her attention and possibly dispute it with her but $1,000 will not cover a lot of time especially after subtracting filing fees and out of pocket expenses (3 hours or less for most lawyers).
If it turns out this lawyer failed to secure a signed retainer agreement with you then your agreement is an oral agreement and it would become a case of he said she said. I can't guarantee that your lawyer will act the same way but personally if I was careless enough not to secure a retainer agreement with a client and got paid $1,000 and had what I believed to be $150 in open charges for legal services that a client was disputing, push comes to shove I would let it go. I might even let it go with the retainer letter. Litigating over $150 is generally not worth my time.
What Kind Of Software Application Packages Are Used In Law?
A Student Here Is Wondering What Kind Of Application Software Packages Are Used In The Law, And The Only Thing I Could Think Of Was Microsoft Office. However, They Need To List 5 Packages!
Are There Specialized Suites Built To Suit Lawyers? Thanks!
That is an awfully broad question, like asking how much does a car cost. The cost of the car depends on the make, model, year, etc. so a lot more details are needed. The same with the kinds of application packages attorneys use (I am an attorney). Microsoft Office is certainly one but many attorneys and law firms still use WordPerfect and Corel packages. Mainly they use it because in addition to being very slow to change, attorneys are very cheap and seldom like to invest in a new product and back in the early 90s, almost everyone used WordPerfect.
Many attorneys use Quickbooks or Quicken for accounting and bookkeeping. Some use Microsoft Money but few use anything other than those 2 main ones.
Attorneys rely on anti-virus protection from Norton or McAfee since the internet is very important for communication with clients as well as research.
For research, some attorney's use Lexis-Nexis and other search engines for researching case law. Some state bar associations have free search engines (like South Carolina has Casemaker free). There are other search programs available too.
For real estate closings, attorneys often use Blackacre, SoftPro and similar packages that will help prepare the closing documents and generate a HUD statement as well as sometimes help with the trust account.
Some attorney use TimeSlips to keep track of their time and there are other programs that also do that.
I hope that helps.
More Laws Means More Work For Lawyers?
Do You Agree
Of course, and with so many politicians being ex-lawyers is it any wonder that we're being inundated with so many new laws.
Here in the UK we've got a barrister for Prime Minister who's also married to a barrister, there's lawyers (we call them solictiors) and barristers at every level of government. And for some strange reason new laws are being passed at 7 times the rate of any previous government.
What Does Infringement Of Intellectual Property Laws Mean?
It means your are stealing someones ideas or story. Take for example the fact that I am writing a movie script. I have registered my story with the WGA (Writers Guild of America). That means I now possess intellectual property and someone who attempts to steal my story idea can be sued...