4 Methods To Help Your Lawyer Assist You To When you want a legal representative at all, you need to work closely using them in order to win your case. No matter how competent they can be, they're planning to need your help. Listed below are four important strategies to help your legal team allow you to win: 1. Be Totally Honest And Up Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - irrespective of what information you're likely to reveal to them. Privilege means whatever you say is kept in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team has to know all things in advance - most importantly information the other side could discover and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep a continuous and factual account of all the information regarding your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys with the data they must enable them to win. 3. Show Up Early For All Engagements Not be late when you're appearing before a court and steer clear of wasting the attorney's time, too, because they are on time, whenever. In reality, because you may want to discuss very last minute details or even be extra ready for the case you're facing, it's a smart idea to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate Which You Have Your Act Together If you've been arrested for just about any crime, it's important so that you can convince the court that you just both regret the actions and so are making strides toward enhancing your life. For example, if you're facing a DUI, volunteer for any rehab program. Be sincere and included in the neighborhood the judge is presiding over. Working more closely along with your legal team increases your odds of absolute success. Follow these tips, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you must win your case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Does Anyone The Real Estate Law Regarding Getting Your Licence In California?
I Currently Enrolled In A Real Estate Class And Im Not Sure If If Was Worth It I Heard That Now You Might Need A Two Year Degree In Real Estate Just To Recieve A Licence
There's no indication at the Calif. Dept. of Real Estate web site that a degree is or will be required.
Two years experience and eight classes is it.
Experience: A minimum of two years full-time licensed salesperson experience within the last five years or the equivalent is required.
Applicants for a real estate broker license examination must have successfully completed the following eight statutorily required college-level courses:
* Real Estate Practice; and
* Legal Aspects of Real Estate; and
* Real Estate Finance; and
* Real Estate Appraisal; and
* Real Estate Economics or Accounting; and
* Three* courses from the following list
o Real Estate Principles
o Business Law
o Property Management
o Real Estate Office Administration
o Mortgage Loan Brokering and Lending
o Advanced Legal Aspects of Real Estate
o Advanced Real Estate Finance
o Advanced Real Estate Appraisal
o Computer Applications in Real Estate
o Common Interest Developments
*If both Real Estate Economics and Accounting are taken, only two courses from the above group are required.
Where Can I Find....Laws,....On Adoptions..& Process Of...?
I'M Interested In Learning All About The Laws Which Goven
Adoptions / Foster Care Homes, Children'S Rights, And
Any Other Pertinent Information, As I Have Helped Some Child-
Ren And Adults, But There Should Be Much More To Learn
About It Too.
I Feel That There Are ''Cracks/Holes'' In The System, Which
Govern Adoptions & Process Of...Which Could Lead To Many
Lawsuits...Because So Many Errors Seem To Be Made By
The Legal System, And Even Through Private Adoptions,
That I Am Getting Very Concerned, About The Welfare And
Health Of The Children Who Fall Victim...To The
System...And Spent Much Time In Foster / Adopt Homes.
I'D Appreciate Any Help I Could Get, On This Matter.
I Am All For The Family Unity...And, Very Much
Against....The Idea Of Anyone Having An Abortion.
Adoption laws vary in every state and country, but especially in the case of domestic adoption, most laws address the same principles and requirements. These include legal necessity, agency preference, and birth parent preference but also include your own limitations as far as age of the child, financial obligations, gender, et cetera. The issues of advertising for adoption and the use of non-licensed adoption facilitators are two issues covered in most state bylaws.
Adoption Laws and Advertising
Advertising is one way for birth parents to locate a prospective family who would be willing and able to adopt their child. It’s also a way for hopeful parents to find someone who would like to place their child up for adoption. Unfortunately, this has been exploited in the past, resulting in child trafficking and other unlawful transactions. Because of this, the act of advertising for adoption purposes is heavily regulated in 26 states. This includes the use of any medium including print, radio, television, flyers, billboards and online by birth parents seeking adoptive parents for their baby or prospective parents looking for a child to adopt.
In some states—Alabama and Kentucky, for example—no advertising of any kind in relation to adoption is allowed. Twelve states have outlawed advertising for adoption purposes by anyone other than licensed adoption agencies or state agencies. Virginia is especially specific, barring any entity from even advertising referral services for adoption purposes.
Some states are more lenient, however. Connecticut allows both birth parents and prospective parents to advertise. Eight more states allow licensed agencies to advertise adoption services. Florida includes family law attorneys in that group, while Louisiana adds crisis pregnancy centers and Nebraska allows birth parents to join them. Most states are very specific and these laws may reach across state lines if the adoptive parents and birth parents live in different states.
Adoption Laws and Unlicensed Facilitators
Though it is legal in every state to place a child up for adoption and to adopt, some states require that this only happen through the agency of a licensed adoption facilitator. Private adoptions are also allowed, meaning the birth parents and adoptive parents come to an adoption agreement without the assistance of a licensed or state adoption agency. It is these private or independent adoptions that are heavily regulated in many states.
Specifically, many states do not allow unlicensed intermediaries to unite birth parents and adoptive parents in order to avoid child exploitation and trafficking. For example, Delaware and Kansas do not allow any unlicensed adoption agencies or intermediaries to facilitate an adoption. Other states are very specific in which unlicensed facilitators may place children for adoption and under what circumstances.
State Adoption Laws
• Alabama - Code of Alabama 1975, Sections 26-10A-1 to 26-10A-38
• Alaska - Alaska Statutes (1999), Sections 18.50.500; 18.50.510 and 25.23.005 to 25.23.240
• Arizona – Arizona Revised Statutes, Chapter 1, Article 1, Sections 8-101 to 8-135; 8-141 to 8-145; 8-161 to 8-166; 8-171 to 8-173
• Arkansas – Arkansas Code of 1987, Sections 9-9-101 to 9-9-103; 9-9-201 to 9-9-224; 9-9-301 to 9-9-303; 9-9-401 to 9-9-412; 9-9-501 to 9-9-508
• California – California General Laws, Family Law Code Sections 8500 to 8548; 8600 to 9206; 9300 to 9340
• Colorado – Colorado Revised Statutes (1999), Sections 19-5-200.2 to 19-5-216; 19-5-301 to 19-5-306; 19-5-402 to 19-5-403 and 25-2-113.5
• Connecticut – General Statutes of Connecticut (1998), Sections 45a-706 to 45a-770
• Delaware - Delaware Code, Title 13, Sections 901 to 932; 961 to 965
• District of Columbia – District of Columbia Code (1999), Title 16 Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 3, Sections 16-301 to 16-315
• Florida – Florida Statutes (1998), Sections 63.012 to 63.301
• Georgia – Georgia Code, Sections 19-8-1 to 19-8-26
• Hawaii – Hawaii Revised Statutes, Sections 578-1 to 578-17
• Idaho – Idaho Statutes, Sections 16-1501 to 16-1515 and 39-258 to 39-259A
• Illinois – Illinois Compiled Statutes (1998), 750, 50/0.01 to 750, 50/24
• Indiana – Indiana Code (1998), Sections 31-19-1-1 to 31-19-29-6
• Iowa – Iowa Code (1998), Sections 600.1 to 600.25
• Kansas – Kansas Statutes (1998), Sections 59-2111 to 59-2144
• Kentucky – Kentucky Revised Statutes (1998), Sections 199.470 to 199.590
• Louisiana – Louisiana Revised Statues, Sections 40:72 to 40:79; Ch.C. Title XII, art. 1167 to 1278
• Maine – Maine Revised Statutes (1999), Title 18-A, Sections 9-101 to 9-108; 9-201 to 9-205; 9-301 to 9-315; 9-401 to 9-404; Title 22, Sections 2706-A; 2765; 4171 to 4176; 8201 to 8206
• Maryland – Maryland Statutes (1999) Family Law, Sections 5-301 to 5-330; 5-401 to 5-415; 5-4A-01 to 5-4A-08; 5-4B-01 to 5-4B-12; 5-4C-01 to 5-4C-07
• Massachusetts – Massachusetts General Laws (1998), Chapter 210, Sections 1 to 11A
• Michigan – Michigan Compiled Laws (1999), Sections 710.21 to 710.70; 722.954b to 722.960
• Minnesota – Minnesota Statutes (1999), Sections 259.20 to 259.89
• Mississippi – Mississippi Code of 1972 (1999), Sections 93-17-1 to 93-17-223
• Missouri – Missouri Revised Statutes, Chapter 453, Sections 453.005 to 453.503
• Montana – Montana Code Annotated 1999, Sections 42-1-101 to 42-8-108; 42-10-101 to 42-10-128
• Nebraska – Nebraska Revised Statutes, Sections 43-101 to 43-165
• Nevada – Nevada Revised Statutes (1999), Sections 127.003 to 127.186; 127.220 to 127.420
• New Hampshire – New Hampshire Revised Statutes (1999), Sections 170-B:1 to 170-B:26
• New Jersey – New Jersey Revised Statutes (1999), Sections 9:3-38 to 9:3-55
• New Mexico – New Mexico Statutes (1999), Sections 32A-5-1 to 32A-5-45
• New York – New York State Consolidated Laws, Domestic Relations Chapter 14, Article 7, Title 1-4; Social Services Chapter 55, Article 6, Title 1, Sections 372-374a; Public Health Chapter 45, Article 41, Title 3, Section 4138
• North Carolina – North Carolina General Statutes (1999), Sections 48-1-100 to 48-4-105; 48-6-100 to 48-6-102; 48-9-101 to 48-10-105
• North Dakota – North Dakota Century Code (1999), Sections 14-15-01 to 14-15-23
• Ohio – Ohio Revised Code (1999), Sections 3107.01 to 3107.99
• Oklahoma – Oklahoma Statutes Annotated (1999), Title 10, Sections 7501-1.1 to 7506-1.2; 7509-1.1 to 7510-3.3
• Oregon – Oregon Revised Statutes (1999), Sections 109.304 to 109.507; 432.425 to 432.420
• Pennsylvania – Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes (1999), Title 23, Sections 2101 to 2910
• Rhode Island – General Laws of Rhode Island (1999), Sections 15-7-2 to 15-7-26; 15-7.1-1 to 15-7.1-4; 15-7.2-1 to 15-7.2-15
• South Carolina – Code of Laws of South Carolina (1999), Sections 20-7-1650 to 20-7-1897
• South Dakota – South Dakota Codified Laws, Sections 25-6-1 to 25-6-23; 25-6A-1 to 25-6A-14
• Tennessee – Tennessee Code (1999), Sections 36-1-102 to 36-1-305
• Texas – Texas Family Code (1999), Sections 162.001 to 162.025; 162.101 to 162.107; 162.201 to 162.206; 162.301 to 162.309; 162.401 to 162.422
• Utah – Utah Code Annotated, Sections 78-30-1 to 78-30-19
• Vermont – Vermont Statutes (1999), Title 15A, Sections 1-101 to 4-113; 6-102 to 7-105
• Virginia – Code of Virginia (1999), Sections 63.1-219.7 to 63.1-238.01
• Washington – Revised Code of Washington, Sections 26.33.020 to 26.33.901; 26.34.010 to 26.34.080
• West Virginia – West Virginia Code (1999), Sections 48-4A-1 to 48-4A-8 and 48-4-1 to 48-4-16
• Wisconsin – Wisconsin Statutes (1999), Sections 48.40 to 48.975
• Wyoming – Wyoming Statutes (1999), Sections 1-22-101 to 1-22-203
How Do I Find A Pro Bono Lawyer?
My Ex-Husband Is Wanting To Terminate My Parental Rights And I Haven'T Had Contact With My Son In Over Two Years And Not By My Choice.
Because your case is not a criminal case, the court will not appoint a lawyer for you and will not help you find a lawyer; you'll have to find one yourself. There are legal aid offices in every state, many areas have organizations that put you in touch with pro bono lawyers, and some lawyers will take pro bono cases on their own.
Since I don't know where you live, I can't direct you to a local resource. But you can find one at CourtReference, the source below. First select your state, then go to the Choose a Court Resource Category box and select "Legal Aid, Lawyer Referral". That will give you a list of all the resources in your state, with statewide and multi-county resources first, then the rest alphabetically by county.
Look for resources with "legal aid" or "pro bono" or "volunteer lawyers" in their description. Click the blue link to go to the organization's website, where you will find information about what types of cases they handle, and how to contact them.
Who Creates International Law?
I See People Making Comments About America'S Involvement In Iraq Being 'Against International Law'...
I'M Curious, What Legislative Body Creates International Law, And How Is It Granted It'S Jurisdiction?
I'Ve Heard Of A World Court Sitting In The Hague, Netherlands, But I'M Not Sure How The Concept Of 'International Law' Is Created.
There Are Treaties, Trade Agreements, Non-Aggression Pacts, Etc. But I'Ve Never Heard Of A Treaty Or Agreement Of Any Kind Limiting The Us'S Involvement In Iraq.
People Also Like To Bring Up The Un Charter. Again, What Legal Strength Does This Document Hold? Is The Us Bound By This Charter Simply By Being A Member Of The Un?
According to Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law : international law is defined as: a body of laws, rules, or legal principles that are based on custom, treaties, and legislation that control or affect the rights and duties of nations in relation to each other, [Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)]. which nations generally recognize as binding in their conduct towards one another. These bodies of nations make up the League of Nations, which primarily initiates these customs, treaties, and legislation through ratified treaties and conventions among themselves.
International law is directly and strongly influenced, although not made, by the writings of jurists and publicists, by instructions to diplomatic agents, by important conventions even when they are not ratified, and by arbitral awards. The decisions of the International Court of Justice and of certain national courts, such as prize courts, are considered by some theorists to be a part of international law. In many modern states, international law is by custom or statute regarded as part of national (or, as it is usually called, municipal) law. In addition, municipal courts will, if possible, interpret municipal law so as to give effect to international law.
The inadequacy of the League of Nations, particularly after World War I and II, and of such idealistic renunciations of war as the Kellogg-Briand Pact, led to the formation of the United Nations as a body capable of compelling obedience to international law and maintaining peace. After World War II, a notable advance in international law was the definition and punishment of war crimes. Attempts at a general codification of international law, however, proceeded slowly under the International Law Commission established in 1947 by the United Nations.
The nuclear age and the space age have led to new developments in international law. The basis of space law was developed in the 1960s under United Nations auspices. Treaties have been signed mandating the internationalization of outer space (1967) and other celestial bodies (1979).
The 1963 limited test ban treaty (see disarmament, nuclear) prohibited nuclear tests in the atmosphere, in outer space, and underwater. The nuclear nonproliferation treaty (1968) attempted to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. The agreements of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, signed by the United States and the USSR in 1972, limited defensive and offensive weapon systems. This was first of many international arms treaties signed between the two nations until the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
Other treaties have covered the internationalization of Antarctica (1959), narcotic interdiction (1961), satellite communications (1963), and terrorism (1973). The Law of the Sea (1983) clarified the status of territorial waters and the exploitation of the seabed. Environmental issues have led to a number of international treaties, including agreements covering fisheries (1958), endangered species (1973), global warming and biodiversity (1992).
Since the signing of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947, there have been numerous international trade agreements. The European Union (prior to 1993, the European Community) has made moves toward the establishment of a regional legal system; in 1988 a Court of First Instance was established to serve as a court of original jurisdiction on certain economic matters.
The establishment of the International Criminal Court (2002), with jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity, and related matters, marked a major step forward in international law despite the United States' repudiation of the treaty under President George W. Bush.
I included the above explanations to show you that International Law is an evolutionary process to meet changing world needs and challenges.
The United States is a member of the League of Nations. "Comments about America's involvement in Iraq being 'against international law'..." means that the majority of nations in the League of Nations did not agree to America's involvement in Iraq.
Nevertheless, the 2003 invasion of Iraq by a multinational force officially began on March 20, 2003. U.S. President George W. Bush stated that the objective of the invasion was "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people".
Prior to the invasion, the United States' official position was that Iraq was in violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1441 regarding weapons of mass destruction and had to be disarmed by force. The United Kingdom and United States attempted to get a U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing military force, but withdrew it before it could come to a vote after France, Russia, and later China all signaled that they would use their Security Council veto power against any resolution that would include an ultimatum allowing the use of force against Iraq. On March 20, 2003, the invasion of Iraq began.
The United Nations Charter is the treaty which forms and establishes the international organization called The United Nations. While this document is often misconstrued as a constitution it is, in fact, an agreement between states and not a compact among the individual peoples to create a government. It was signed at the United Nations Conference on International Organization in San Francisco on June 26, 1945 by 50 of the 51 original member countries (Poland, the other original member, which was not represented at the Conference, signed it later). It entered into force on October 24, 1945, after being ratified by the five permanent members of the Security Council—the Republic of China (later replaced by People's Republic of China), France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (later replaced by the Russian Federation), the United Kingdom, and the United States—and a majority of the other signatories.
As a Charter it is a constituent treaty, and all members are bound by its articles. Furthermore, the Charter states that obligations to the United Nations prevail over all other treaty obligations . Most countries in the world have now ratified the Charter. Though one notable exception is the Holy See, which has chosen to remain a permanent observer state and therefore is not a full signatory to the Charter. All nations that belong to The League of Nations, governed by the United Nations Charter are bound by this charter simply be being a member of it.
How Does Assault Charges Work?
Ok So Yesterday, My Friend Blew Up At Me(She'S A Girl Im A Guy) And She Weights 300 Pounds, Me Only 180. Basically She Pushed Me Down, Sat On My Chest And Started Beating The Crap Out Of My Face. After A Few Minutes, I Could No Longer Breathe And I Was Tired Of Getting Hit. I Tried Getting Her To Move And Asking Her To Move With No Luck. So I Hit Her In The Face Once, She Got Off, Then I Left And Called The Police. Now They Are Saying That She Is Going To Press Charges On Me, While I Said I Dont Really Want To Because Feel Bad Enough For Hitting A Girl.
What Advice Could You Give Me? And What Would You Do If This Happened To You?/
If she decides to press charges against you (by calling the cops and making a report), then, yes, you can get in trouble.
The best thing you can do, is call the cops where it happened (in case it happened in a different city/county from where you live), let them know what happened. Tell them everything that you just said above. Bottom line: be honest. Yeah, you feel "bad" for hitting a girl, but it was self defense. If they ask if you want to press charges, you can tell them, no, but you just wanted the report documented.
The problem is if she goes to the cops first, their story is already biased toward her. They're going to ask, "If she did all this to you, why didn't you come to us first?" sort of thing. Again, you didn't do anything wrong, it'll just look bad if you don't tell the cops. Tell them you just want it documented in case SHE goes to them. Good luck, and remember, tell the TRUTH! I'm not just telling you that 'cause it's the right thing to do, I'm telling you 'cause it's easier to keep your story straight.
What Is Legal Process Outsourcing..?What Is Scope For Fresh Law Graduates In It..??
www.fealtylegal.com - 8k - Cached - More from this site
www.rediff.com/money/2006/aug/01bpo.ht... - _5643.php