Finding An Experienced Lawyer Regardless of what your legal needs are you will notice that there are numerous lawyers in your town that advertise that they concentrate on your type of case. This can make the whole process of finding one with quite a lot of experience somewhat of a challenge. However, should you follow the tips below you will be able to restrict your quest on the right one out of very little time. Step one is to generate a listing of the lawyers which are listed in your neighborhood that specialize in your situation. When you are causeing this to be list you ought to only include those you have an effective vibe about based on their advertisement. Then you can narrow this list down by taking a bit of time evaluating their webpage. There you will be able to find how many years they are practicing and some general information about their success rates. At this point your list must have shrunken further to individuals that you just felt had professional websites along with an appropriate volume of experience. You should then make time to lookup independent reviews of each attorney. Be sure you see the reviews rather than just depending on their overall rating. The details within the reviews will give you a concept of the way that they communicate with their clients and the time they invest into each case that they are focusing on. Finally, you will want to meet up with at least the last three lawyers who have the credentials you are searching for. This provides you with some time to genuinely evaluate how interested they can be in representing you and your case. It really is important to follow many of these steps to actually find someone containing the best degree of experience to obtain the best possible outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
I'M Being Accused Of Felony Burglary. Lawyer Time?
Today, At My Job (Apartment Complex, ~50 Units, Working Here Since Early February) The State Police Were Called In To Examine A Break-In In An Area Of The Office.
Now, This Area, I Have No Keys To, There Is A Camera Pointing At One Entrance, The Other Entrance Is A Fire Door. The Camera Is Almost Immediately Above The Fire Door.
Someone Came In The Fire Door, Covered The Camera, And Took Money, The Officer Said Its An Inside Job Because They Know Where To Find The Money. However, Anyone Who Lives Here Knows Where The Money Is, If You Buy A Stamp, The Money Is Retrieved. If You Need Quarters For The Pop Machine/Laundry Machine, The Money Is Retrieved. I Don'T See How This Points To Me At All.
Then The Subject Retrieved Whatever He Covered The Camera With, And Left The Area.
I Was Sleeping At Home, With My Girlfriend, When This Happened. She Verified I Was Home During Independent Questioning. There Are No Fingerprints, Footage, Or Witnesses. We Also Had An Employee Run Off With A Set A Keys A Few Months Back.
In Short, I Haven'T Been Arrested, Or Charged, Although The Officer Notified Me I Am The #1 Suspect (Mostly Because I Refused A Polygraph)
Any Advice? Lawyers To Recommend?
It Is Known I Own A Set Of Lock Picks (Legal Is Pa), Although I Purchased Them Jointly From Curiosity/Using Them At Work To Re-Key Locks That Tenants Lost Keys To.
Also Keep In Mind This Is In The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
It's definitely lawyer time. A lawyer might be able to get you off. It sounds like the police have a pretty flimsy case against you.
Felony burglary is a serious charge. If you're convicted, you will carry the "convicted felon" label with you for the rest of your life. Worst case, if you have no priors, an attorney might be able to get the prosecutor to let you plead guilty to a lesser offense.
I'm sure you know that polygraph tests are not allowed to be used as evidence in court, so it sounds like the officer is trying to intimidate you. But you should get a lawyer because this is not the time to be playing Perry Mason.
What Is Life Really Like In Law School?
Please Anybody In Law School Or That Has Any Idea - Thanks For Your Response. I'M Considering Going To Law School.
Law school really depends on the particular law school. Some schools automatically drop the bottom 10-20% of students after each year, which makes those law schools very competitive (ironically enough, those are also the bottom tier law schools such as Southwestern). Other law schools are less cut-throat.
No matter where you go, keep in mind that your first year of law school is a combination of boot camp and hazing. Your professors will assign reading that will overwhelm you (there's generally between 5-9 hours of reading per day). At some point during your first year, you will seriously question your decision to go to law school.
During your first year, you'll have very little time for things other than school. But, my friends and I found that law students really need to be involved in some non-law school activity, just to give you some sort of release.
After your first year, you'll have a lot more time to enjoy yourself. In addition, you'll be able to choose the classes that you take so you'll be able to specialize in the areas of law that really interest you.
Law school can be really hard on a person. You should keep in mind your reasons for going to law school. Whatever your goals are, reminding yourself of those reasons will help to keep you focused on the bigger picture.
Also...while people will tell you that grades are all-important, I'm living proof that it's not true. My first year grades were pretty bad, but I worked hard and brought them up significantly. In fact, at a recent job interview, the interviewer was more impressed by the amazing jump in my GPA than by what my actual GPA was (he said it showed real determination to make such a huge leap). So, if you do go to law school, keep this in mind.
How Can I Get Free Legal Advice?
There a large variety of way you can get free legal advice. In New York City, they have the legal aid society and many other similar organizations that will help you with such matter. However, they each have their own requirements. For instance, some of them might asked you to make below certain amount of money annually. That's the most rigid requirement.
For a better list, try to contact your local courts to find out what kind of free legal services that they have available.
Getting A Lawyer For A Disability In Missouri?
For Getting Disability In Missouri, What Lawyer Would Be Suggested?
Our Missouri attorneys specializing in Disability law and all corresponding legal issues are here to assist you with any and all legal inquiries. They will answer all your questions concerning Disability in Missouri.
Any Us Labor Lawyers Out There?
I Have An Interesting Question Concerning Overtime Pay In The State Of Virginia. My Wife Is A Nurse (Hourly Pay) Who Is Given An &Quot;On-Call&Quot; Cell Phone For 1-2 Weeks At A Time. She Is Constantly On The Thing When She Has It Dealing With Issues At Work And Talking To Doctors. She Is Also Required To Stay In Town On These Days In Case She Has To Go In For Some Reason.
I Am A Manager Myself And I Believe That She Is Due Compensation For The Time She Spends On The Phone With Work. I Cannot Find Supporting Regulations For This Though (Probably Do Not Know Where To Look) And Wonder If Any Of You Know Where To Find The Info.
Labor laws can be quite complex, however most of your questions can be answered here:
and thanks for voting for Webb.
Should I Contact A Lawyer Or The Hospital First If I Suspect A Family Member Experienced Medical Malpractice?
My Mother Was Seen In The Er After Slicing Off The Tip Of Her Index Finger. The Physician Was Very Rude And Short With Her When The Lidocaine Block That He Administered Didn'T Completely Work And She Still Complained Of Pain While He Was Working With Her Finger. He Called A Hand Surgeon For A Consult And After The Consult Decided To Try To Stitch Across It To Stop The Bleeding. It Was Very Painful For My Mother And Needless To Say It Did Not Work, Also During The Procedure He Was Mumbling Commands To Her And Then Getting Frustrated As If She Wasn'T Cooperating. Then He Decides To Try To Cauterize The Bleeds And While Doing So Makes It A Point To Show The Nurses That She Is Not Always Responding To The Cautery Tool And States That She Isn'T In Pain, It Is Anxiety But Never Gives Her Anything For Anxiety Either, Also While I Am Watching This All Take Place And Whispering As If I Was Not Standing There. Ends Up Putting A Tourniquet On Her Finger After Cauterizing It And Leaves It There For 45 Minutes. Comes Back And States That The Wound Is Superficial In Areas And That He Does Not Think It Requires Any Skin Graft But We Can Follow Up With The Hand Surgeon If We Want Then Dresses It With A Gel Bandaid And Gauze. The Nursing Staff Was Horrified, You Could See It On Their Face And One Nurse Even Apologized. Needless To Say We Went To The Hand Surgeon For A Second Opinion. When He Looked At The Wound He Was Shocked Because It Was Much Worse Than The Er Physician Described The Night Before. He Said He Told The Er Physician That If The Wound Bed Was Less Than One Centimeter It Would Not Required A Graft And He Could Try Stitching To Stop The Bleeding. The Er Physician Had Told Him It Was Less Than A Centimeter. When He Measured It Was 1.6 By 1.3. And Decided On A Skin Graft Scheduled That Same Day. I'M Not Sure Where To Go With This. I Am Disgusted. I Am An Rn And Am So Angry That I Let My Mom Suffer Through Something That I Thought Was Necessary But Really Wasn'T.
I am not a lawyer, but this is something I know an awful lot about.
You don't ever contact the hospital first, you always contact a lawyer first. Don't call a lawyer off the TV. Don't call a lawyer in a small town. Only talk to someone who is a bona fide med/mal atty, not someone who *also* does med mal. It matters to whom you speak.
I tell you to call a lawyer because you have a Constitutional right to seek redress under the law. However, there are some things you should know before you do because it may well change your mind. You will not feel better, and you will certainly become more angry. This is the nature of medical malpractie and tort reform.
In order to sue a doc for malpractice, you must first prove that the doc's care fell below the standard of care, and that that falling below the standard of care caused a permanent injury. Now you've got number one handled, but do you have number two? Permanent doesn't mean missing your fingertip. Permanent means unable to walk, talk, work, drive, live life as you always have before. Permanent means injured so completely as to affect other people's lives because you need help just to live every day. The average person on the street doesn't know this. They just call you greedy for suing those poor docs. They don't know that there's no such thing as an "I'm p*ssed" lawsuit; that judges can't award principle of the thing, they can only award what you have actually financially lost. As an example, when someone dies due to a medical mistake, most of those folks are classified as "non-economic damages." Because they don't need a lifetime care -- cuz they're dead -- their families don't get to sue.
I'm not being snarky. I know what it is to know the doctor failed, other doctor failed, nurses failed, the lot of them together blame you, they also call you greedy, and there's nothing you can do.
If your mom does not have *that* kind of an injury, you may well be entitled to the cap for non-economic damages, typically capped at $250k to $300k. The problem is it costs that much just to get to court in the first place, and you best believe the doc's insurance company will make your lawyer spend every bit of $250k to keep from having to pay you $250k. And it's the lawyer's $250k you're spending to get to court, not your own.
When a lawyer takes your case, you are essentially taking out an interest free loan. And the risk is all his because if you don't win, he doesn't recoup that money that he paid out. And that $250k does not include his fees. He doesn't get paid his fees, his hours worked, unless he wins. That $250k is just the court costs. That is medical experts, because you know as well as I do, docs will not speak against another doc. That is also economists who must be hired to count the cost of your injury. They will literally count how many pairs of ortho socks you will need over your lifetime, and you will not receive a penny more. That is court reporters, depositions, production, arbitrators, the whole nine yards.
I'm sorry your mom was hurt, and I'm sorry the doctor was such a pinhead. Why these guys don't get someone who knows what they're doing is beyond me. Are they that arrogant? Or do they really not know that they just don't know what they're doing? I find that to be a very valid question
Do contact a lawyer. It has happened before that a skilled lawyer rights a very artful letter and causes said doc to just pay the cost to fix the problem. No lawsuit, no millions of dollars, no years of drama and court costs, just, here's what it will cost to fix it, and I'll pay for that. It's worth a shot. Don't think evil of an attorney who wants to get paid for his work. We all want to get paid, and it's only lawyers who get demonzied for getting paid. Go figure.