The Best 10
Legal Aid Online in San Luis Obispo

Home | Main Page | Advertise With Us | Sitemap

Hospitals
Hospitals
Dentists
Dentists
Coffee
Coffee
Taxi
Taxi
Towing
Towing
Insurance
Insurance
Locksmiths
Locksmiths
Pizza
Pizza
Plumbers
Plumbers
Restaurants
Restaurants
Grocery
Grocery
Next_Page

Legal Aid Online in
93401, 93402, 93403, 93405, 93406, 93407, 93408, 93409, 93410, 93412
Finding A Seasoned Lawyer No matter what your legal needs are you will see that there are numerous lawyers in your area that advertise they specialize in your form of case. This could make the entire process of finding one with quite a lot of experience somewhat of a challenge. However, if you follow the following you will be able to limit your pursuit on the right one out of almost no time. The first task is to make a listing of the lawyers that happen to be listed in your area that specialize in your situation. While you are causeing this to be list you need to only include those which you have a great vibe about depending on their advertisement. You may then narrow this list down by using some time evaluating their website. There you will be able to find just how many years they have been practicing plus some general details about their success rates. At this moment your list ought to have shrunken further to individuals that you just felt had professional websites and an appropriate volume of experience. You should then take the time to check out independent reviews of every attorney. Be sure you browse the reviews rather than just depending on their overall rating. The info inside the reviews provides you with a concept of the direction they connect to their clients and the length of time they invest into each case that they are working on. Finally, you will need to meet with a minimum of the final three lawyers which have the credentials you are searching for. This will give you some time to really evaluate how interested these are in representing your case. It really is imperative that you follow many of these steps to ensure that you hire a company which has the correct level of experience to obtain the ideal outcome.

ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are, California Grover Beach | Pismo Beach | Nipomo | Arroyo Grande | San Luis Obispo | SLO | Morro Bay | Los Osos Orcutt Ojai Arizona | Lake Havasu | Kingman | Bullhead | Prescott | Payson | Show Low | Snowflake | Taylor | Flagstaff Sedona | Cottonwood | Camp Verde | Williams | Washington | Skagit | Whatcom | Bellingham | Ferndale Lynden Mount Vernon | Sedro Woolley | Burlington | Oak Harbor | Anacortes | Camano Island | Stanwood | Arlington Langley Clinton | San Juan Islands | BC | Duncan | Port Alberni | Comox | Courtney | Campbell River | Parksville | Langley Maple ridge | Chilliwack | Abbotsford | Mission | Whistler | Squamish | Sunshine Coast | Terrace | Kitimat | Smithers Prince Rupert | Prince George | Williams Lake | Quesnel | Sidney | Victoria | Alberta | Red Deer | Lloydminster | Ontario | Sudbury | Sault Ste Marie | North Bay | Timmins | Muskoka | Gravenhurst | Parry Sound | Huntsville | Kingston | Belleville | Cornwall | Brockville | Dundas | Pembroke | Renfrew | Smith Falls | Cobourg

What Is The Statute Of Limitations On A Wrongful Death Lawsuit In Missouri?
How Many Years Before It Is Too Late To Bring A Wrongful Death Lawsuit? What Would Be My First Step In Pursuing A Wrongful Death Lawsuit Besides Hiring An Attorney? Would I Likely Have To Pay Or Could I Work On A Contingency Basis?

A cause of action for wrongful death accrues on the date of death and must be filed within three years of that date (2 years if claim arises from medical negligence).

It would be up to the attorney whether or not he or she would require a retainer or accept the case on contingency. I imagine the facts surrounding your case would have a significant bearing.

Adoption Laws?
I Know Someone Who Recently Placed Her Baby Up For Adoption. Prior To The Adoption Going Through She Had To Place An Ad In The Paper...Something About Making Sure The Father Didn'T Want To Exercise His Rights? Here'S My Question, If The Mother Told The Father She Was Pregnant And Planning To Give It Up For Adoption Why Would She Need To Place An Ad In The Paper Making Sure He Didn'T Want To Exercise His Rights? Wouldn'T He Just Need To Sign Over His Rights At The Adoption Hearing?

Hi!

The first answerer is right but I want to add that Notice by Publication is part of the Due Process that is required by the Court before Termination of Parental Rights can be granted. The Court wants to be sure that any interested party - specifically the father, is duly notified of the Court proceedings and is given fair opportunity to make a claim before the Court before judgement is granted as the final judgement is final and irreversable.

If Due Process is not observed there are grounds for the claimant to challenge the ruling. The Court is trying to protect everyone's best interests by covering all its bases.*

If the Court finds that the claimant/father has been served either in person or via Public Notice they assume that consent is given if the claimant/father does not appear and can grant a TPR without his signature or presence.

I hope this helps clarify a little!

* Note to whom it may concern: When I worked in Court it was required that Notice of Publication be done in the last known city of residence for the claimant/defendant. I know that in some cases of TPR (DSS cases and adoption cases), Notice of Publication was given in the cheapest paper or smallest circulation. Sometimes to save Court/DSS $ but on some occasions to meet the standards of Due Process but lessen the chance of the claimant coming forward (the assuption being the paper was so small they wouldn't see it). If you are a putative father who wants their child or other interested party in such a case I would strongly advise checking smaller publications regularly to avoid being caught in this loophole.

ETA: Yes, as it provides documented proof of dilligence -especially if the whereabouts are unknown at the time of the hearing or the father has been uninvolved in the entire process with the Court. The Court has no way of knowing what one party says to the other or if a person is lying all together about having said something to the other party outside of the Court or the presence of a Court Official. I doesn't mean they think your friend is a liar, they are just "covering their butts" by providing written proof that he was told of the Courts intentions concerning his child and showing he had the opportunity to say his piece if he had wanted to.

What Would Be The Ethical Things For A Defense Lawyer To Do In The Following Situation?
A Defense Lawyer Is Defending Someone Accused Of A Violent Crime Such As Rape, Murder, Or Assault, And The Lawyer Knows The Client Is Guilty Because The Client Confessed To Him Or He Has Access To Evidence That Clearly Shows The Client Is Guitly. Is It Unethical For The Lawyer To Try To Get The Client Declared &Quot;Not Guilty&Quot; So He Can Walk Free Unpunished, Or Is The Attorney'S Only Obligation To His Client? Or Does The Attorney Have A Moral And Ethical Obligation To Society To Insure The Guilty Party Is Punished? What Is The Bigger Purpose: Defending The Client Or Defending Society?

Look at it this way: If the prosecution doesn't have enough evidence to convict a person, and that person has exercised his right to remain silent when speaking to the police, should the authorities be able to lay a charge with the expectation that the accused will talk to his lawyer, and expect that they'll be able to rely on those statements to the lawyer in court?

It completely undermines the right to remain silent and the right to counsel, if your statements to your lawyer are fair game for making out a case against you.

That said, such knowledge isn't without a consequence. If an accused confesses to his lawyer, that lawyer's duty to the court prevents him from being able to adduce evidence of things he knows not to be true. Thus, alibi evidence is off the table, evidence that somebody else is the guilty party is off the table...basically, any evidence that the accused is innocent cannot be adduced, because the defence lawyer would be knowingly misleading the court, and thus violating his duty.

Still, the lawyer still has a duty to challenge the prosecution's case against the accused. If the prosecution doesn't have the witnesses and/or physical evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the court cannot convict, and it's the defence lawyer's duty to see that the court realizes that it cannot convict.

It it's not an admission, but physical evidence in the lawyer's possession, then other obligations kick in. A lawyer can't conceal evidence. (There are some grey areas if he intends to bring it up in court himself, but he can't just take the murder weapon and hide it away.) In Canada, at least, there's a practice trick called the 'brown bagging'. If a defendant brings you the murder weapon and tells you to deal with it (and refuses to take it away himself)...defence counsel can't just bring it to the police himself; it would be easy enough for the police to zero in on the suspect just by watching who he represents in court. Instead, defence counsel should put the object into a paper bag, retain another lawyer (thus invoking privilege with the other lawyer), and have the other lawyer bring the object to the police, telling them only that it might be relevant to some investigation.

I Need Some Consultation Regarding This Legal Situation..?
Someone I Know And His Friend, Have Been Arrested For Carrying Heroin In Their Car. This Guy I Know, Which We'Ll Call &Quot;John&Quot;. John Was Driving The Car, This Car Belongs To His Friend'S Mom. He Was Begged By His Friend To Drive Him To Pa, And Was Arrested On The Way There. Now The Mom Of John'S Friend Went John'S Girlfriend To Retrieve John'S Identification Proof Of Address And Work And She Did Not Consult John'S Mom About Actions. Can I Please Get Some Ideas About What To Do And The Reasons For Why The Friend'S Mom Took The Actions She Did, And If She Was Right Or Wrong On Doing So.

As far as I know there's no reason John's friend's mom should need this information, I would suggest not making it available to her. John needs to seek legal counsel as soon as possible about what his options are. If he is found to have not been aware that he was transporting an illegal substance he should be okay but I wouldn't give out any information unless his attorney advises it's okay. In either case, legal counsel should be his first step because they can walk him through everything he'll need to know. He should make sure to ask as many questions as possible about his options. Best of luck!

How Much Does A Dwi Lawyer Cost? Is 2500 Too Much?
Help Me!!!!!!!!!

Your not getting out of a DWI. Don't waste money on a "good" lawyer. NOT WORTH IT. All they will say is "uh, you should plea guilty"

Am I Entitled To Legal Representation, Even Though It'S Not A Court Case?
I Am Currently Trying To Keep My Foodstamp Case From Being Closed At Human Services Department In New Mexico, Again. I Won'T Bore You With The Details, But I Am A Single Unemployed Mother And They Are Making Everything Difficult. Am I Entitled To A Public Defender To Represent My Case?

You are entitled to representation, but the attorney will not be a public defender. You can contact a New Mexico Legal Aid office near you. This link will help:

http://www.nmlegalaid.org/content/nmla-o...