Top Ten
Legal Aid in San Luis Obispo

Home | Main Page | Advertise With Us | Sitemap


Legal Aid in
93401, 93402, 93403, 93405, 93406, 93407, 93408, 93409, 93410, 93412
The majority of people today do not think about selecting a law firm until finally they are in desperate need. The lawful matter may possibly be personal, like family law, for a separation or if you are hunting for a bankrupcy or trust attorney. It may be a criminal case you want to be defended on. Businesses want attorneys as well, whether they are being sued for discrimination, sexual harassment, or perhaps unjustified business practices. Tax law firms are also helpful when engaging with government problems. Just like doctors, lawyers have specialties. A big, full service law firm has a lot of legal professionals with diverse areas of abilities, so based upon on your individual legal issue, you can instantly hold on to the finest legal representative to match your existing need without having to start your search each time you need legal support.It is most effective to locate a legal representative you can trust. You want one with a good record, who ishonest, efficient, and wins cases. You would like to have assurance that they will represent you effectively and charge you reasonably for their services. Quite often a referral from a friend or business associate can be very helpful, however you should hold your options open and evaluate all the firms accessible, simply because when you need legal support, you need it quickly and you desire the best you can manage to pay for. Thank you for browsing for a attorney with us. Your time is valuable, and Action Pages, at, is happy to offer you specific search parameters to satisfy your needs. We consistently strive to focus on the most popular phrases so you can promptly find anything at all you are searching for.

ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are, California Grover Beach | Pismo Beach | Nipomo | Arroyo Grande | San Luis Obispo | SLO | Morro Bay | Los Osos Orcutt Ojai Arizona | Lake Havasu | Kingman | Bullhead | Prescott | Payson | Show Low | Snowflake | Taylor | Flagstaff Sedona | Cottonwood | Camp Verde | Williams | Washington | Skagit | Whatcom | Bellingham | Ferndale Lynden Mount Vernon | Sedro Woolley | Burlington | Oak Harbor | Anacortes | Camano Island | Stanwood | Arlington Langley Clinton | San Juan Islands | BC | Duncan | Port Alberni | Comox | Courtney | Campbell River | Parksville | Langley Maple ridge | Chilliwack | Abbotsford | Mission | Whistler | Squamish | Sunshine Coast | Terrace | Kitimat | Smithers Prince Rupert | Prince George | Williams Lake | Quesnel | Sidney | Victoria | Alberta | Red Deer | Lloydminster | Ontario | Sudbury | Sault Ste Marie | North Bay | Timmins | Muskoka | Gravenhurst | Parry Sound | Huntsville | Kingston | Belleville | Cornwall | Brockville | Dundas | Pembroke | Renfrew | Smith Falls | Cobourg

Question About The Estate Tax?
My Parents Have A Professional Do Their Estate Planning But I Had A Quick Question Since I'M Not In The Loop (Yet). I'Ll Ask This Simply And Hope For A Simple Answer. My Grandma Passed Away And Left Her Estate To My Father. He Then Incorporated It Into His Estate. The Total Now Is About $5 Million In Cash And Property. If My Parents Pass Away And My Brother And I Each Get Half Do The Taxes Come Out Of The Original 5 Million Or Do They Say Since We Each Are Getting 2.5 Million They Tax Based On That? Say The Exemption Is 1 Million And Your Parents Have 2 Million. Do They Tax The Entire 2 Million Or Do They Tax Nothing Because Each Heir Is Getting The Exempted Amount? Thanks.

Estate tax is a federal tax imposed on a decedent's estate to the extent it exceeds the estate-tax exemption in the year of death. The number of beneficiaries is irrelevant. Using your example: if your parents' estate were valued at $2 million when the survivor of them passes, and the then current estate-tax exemption were $1 million, WITHOUT proper planning, the estate tax would be $345,800, based on a $1 million taxable estate. WITH proper planning, however, the estate tax would be $0, as both husband and wife would take advantage of their own estate tax exemption, saving the estate, and ultimately the heirs, over 345 grand!

Where husband and wife have "simple" wills, that is, all to the survivor at the first death, and then to the kids, the estate-tax exemption of the deceased spouse (first spouse to die) is wasted. Using your scenario, the surviving spouse with assets of $2 million will get only one estate-tax exemption at his or her death. Of course, if the couple were worth less than the estate-tax exemption, all of this would be moot.

That said, it is IMPERATIVE your parents work with an attorney, competent in estate planning, to make sure their documents (wills, trusts, etc) provide for the estate-tax exemption for BOTH of them. Given your reference to working with a professional, they may have this strategy in place. While HOW it's done is beyond the scope of this Q&A format, for informational purposes - or if you want to Google it for more info - it's called a Credit-Sheltered or Bypass Trust.

Estate tax was repealed for 2010, and, unless Congress acts, reverts to $1 million in 2011.

Hope that helps.

On behalf of all of your responders, who take the time and effort to help questioners in this free Yahoo! community, THANK YOU in advance for taking the time to choose your "Best" Answer. We really appreciate it.

DISCLAIMER: While the information in this response was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. The opinion voiced in this answer is for general information only and it shall not be construed as tax, legal, or investment advice for any individual, nor shall it be considered a solicitation for clients. Questioners are urged to consult with their professional advisers before making any decisions regarding their finances.

Bradley Mann, CFP®, EA, BCE, CFS, AAMS
Certified Financial Planner Practitioner
Enrolled Agent | Admitted to Practice before the IRS
Board Certified in Estate Planning

"Providing sound retirement opportunities and tax-reduction strategies since 1985."

What Happens At A Consultation With A Divorce Lawyer?
What Information Will They Need, Etc?

A consultation with a divorce lawyer is an opportunity for you to decide if you want to use that lawyer or not. You can ask him/her questions about their rates and anything else you want pertaining to the divorce or about how they would proceed. It's a good way for you to compare different lawyers and their rates, and to decide whether you would have confidence in one to work for you or not. Most consultations are free, but some charge, so it's always best to make sure first so there are no surprises. You might find one you like right off the bat, but it might be a good idea to talk with a few before you decide.
You will probably just need some basic information with you for the consultation: incomes, whether you own a house or not, the date and place the marriage took place, the reason you are seeking divorce, whether there are kids involved or not, etc. You might want to have additional information with you, though, just in case, such as SSN numbers, 401k/retirement plans, stocks, savings and checking accounts, credit cards, loans and other debts. You could bring along a copy of your last year's taxes. Mostly, though, the consultation is for you to decide whether you think that lawyer is a good fit for you. If you decide to use them, they will let you know what other information they will need.

I Need To File A Appeal Aginst Judge And The Attorney Fees Are To Run Anywhere From $3000 To $5000?

That sounds about right for the retainer. Any types of appeals are a very expensive and time consuming process, so do not be surprised if the final bill exceeds $25,000. Depends quite a bit on what you are appealing, and whether it is state or federal courts. I've seen legal bills for an appeal run over $250,000, and that was in a state court, not federal.

Looking For Some Legal Advice. Please Help!?
Okay, So My Dad Has Had Me For The Past Year And Recently They Gad A Court Hearing Where They Asked Me Who Id Rather Live With But My Mom Was There And In Fear I Said Nothing, Not Wanting To Hurt My Mom. Im Now Living Back With My Mom And Id Rather Live Back With My Dad.... My Dads All For It And Says He'Ll Do What It Takes. So How Do We Approach This? My Friend Suggested Making An Anonymous Tip To Cps And Then Just Telling Them In Secrecy That I Want To Live With My Dad.... But This Seems A Bit Cruel. So Please Help! Any Suggestions Will Be Much Appreciated!

You, personally, must write a letter to the court telling what you did, it is called an error of omission and saying what you really want.. You need to have some good reasons for why you want to live with your Dad so you better talk to him or a counselor about that. Why you were not told what to expect in court and helped to say what you wanted and not be intimidated by the circumstances is just stupid. You give the letter to your Dad to take to his lawyer who must reopen the physical custody hearing and ask for a new date to rehear the matter. You also must talk to your mother about your feelings and about going back to live with your Dad, you might want to do this with a counselor or CPS agent or social worker present who can help keep everyone calm and let you get what you have to say said. This process is going to take a few months at least but it will work if everything comes out up front and honest. Going to CPS behind your mothers back is the dumbest thing you could do unless you are actually being physically harmed when in her care.

What Is The Common Heirarchy Of Paralegals And Attorneys In A Law Firm?

There may be a hierarchy among paralegals by seniority, by area of specialization, or by the relative positions of the lawyer they work under (if they are assigned to a specific lawyer). In the same manner, lawyers frequently have a pecking order within the firm - although that order may be prioritized differently, base on the value of their clients' accounts, their affiliation with partners, etc.

But the paralegals always work for the attorneys - even if the paralegal is an independent contractor working as a virtual assistant for a remote attorney in an online working relationship.


Child Custody?
I Was Wondering If Anyone Could Help Me Or Give Some Advice. Im Only 17 ( I Cannot Get Legal Custody Until I Am 18) And The Father Of My Son Is 18. Long Story Short I Had To Go And Get A Pfa Against Him And Now The Agreement Is That He Can Only See The Baby Through Court Visitations And My Mother Has Temporary Custody Until Another Custody Order Is Filed. He Told My Attorney Though That Hes Going To File For Custody. Im Very Scared That He Will And I Cannot Let It Happen. Any Help On What To Do?

Child custody rights are awarded to parents, step-parents, grandparents, and other legal guardians as determined by a family court judge. Legal judgments in child custody rights cases favor biological parents who are deemed suitable guardians. Child custody rights are awarded based on the best interests of the children involved. Child custody rights and responsibilities detail who will have legal and physical custody of the child. Child support payments will also be determined where applicable in child custody rights cases.

Child custody rights may be shared by both parents or, primary child custody rights may be awarded to one parent or legal guardian. Since the 1970s the family court will award child custody rights contingent with the best interests of the child. In the past, family courts used to favor mothers in child custody rights cases. This bias is still held by some family law judges though they will always make a fair assessment of a child's best interests when determining child custody rights.

In seven out of ten cases, child custody rights are awarded primarily to the mother of the children. Primary child custody rights are awarded to fathers less than ten percent of the time. Joint custody is awarded about twenty percent of the time meaning that child custody rights and responsibilities are shared by both parents. In most cases that do not involve abuse or neglect, parents will be free to determine the division of child custody rights as long as the arrangement is approved by a family court judge.

Parents can largely determine child custody rights when there are not major discrepancies in the terms sought by each party. Mediation is a process by which a neutral third party intercedes to facilitate decisions about child custody rights. When an agreement can be made through medications and approved by a judge, the terms of this parenting plan will be upheld. When there are disagreements over child custody rights, the case will be heard by a judge who will ultimately determine child custody rights.

When a judge hears a child custody rights case, s/he will take several factors into account when making a decision. Courts will often rely on the expert testimony of a psychologist who will evaluate child custody rights options by looking at a number of relevant factors. The following factors are taken into consideration when determining child custody rights: past parenting behavior, the age of the child, the child's preference, the amount of time a parent can dedicate to properly raising a child, household stability, financial considerations, and other specifics. Children may be allowed to testify at any age though special considerations are made for younger children.

Child custody rights involve both physical and legal rights and responsibilities. Physical child custody rights refer to who will actually take care of the child~ who the child will live and spend time with. Legal child custody rights refer to parental decision making power yielded over the major events of a child's life, such as education, health care, activities, religion, and the like.


Child visitation agreements are court-approved arrangements regarding the time a child spends with his or her non custodial parent after a divorce. When a divorce involves children, the court will decide the custody arrangements to meet the needs and interests of the children involved. In some cases, the court will award sole custody to one parent. More often, however, child custody will be shared between the parents and child visitation agreements will be created.

When joint custody is awarded to both parents, there are two types of custody involved: legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody is the right to make decisions which influence the child's life and physical custody is who the child actually lives with. Typically in a joint custody situation, one parent will have primary physical custody of the child and the other will have child visitation rights.

The divorcing parents have the legal right to determine the terms of child visitation agreements, so long as they are able to agree. This means that the parents have flexibility in deciding when the child will spend time with each parent, so long as child visitation agreements are approved by the family court. There are, however, several factors which prevent two parents from being able to successfully create child visitation agreements independent of the courts.

In some cases, like those involving violence or significant hostility, it is virtually impossible for two parents to agree to the terms of child visitation agreements. In other cases, the parents may have been successful in developing child visitation agreements, but there were problems in its implementation. When one parent is consistently late for child visitation, skips visits altogether, does not inform the custodial parent of where s/he is taking the child, or there is a hostile parent relationship, the court may intercede to implement child visitation agreements.

When the court determines child visitation agreements, the product is typically referred to as the child visitation schedule. Both parents are bound by the terms of court ordered child visitation agreements. Compliance with child visitation agreements is mandatory, even if the child does not wish to visit the non-custodial parent. The only exception to this rule is when the child's welfare is compromised.

Court ordered child visitation agreements will typically allow the non custodial parent to have the child every other weekend, some weekdays, and some holidays. In some cases, the court will declare that all non custodial parental visits be supervised by a neutral third party adult. At any time, a parent can request a court review of child visitation agreements to make necessary modifications. Again, child visitation agreements will always reflect the best interests of the children involved.


Child custody for fathers following a divorce is one of the most important aspects of a dissolving marriage. Throughout history the legal presumptions about child custody for fathers has changed significantly. Before the twentieth century children were regarded as the property of their father. Under common law, child custody for fathers was commonly awarded, as children were considered a father's rightful property. A major shift occurred after this period in history, as family courts came to favor mothers in child custody cases. It was presumed that under normal circumstances, children did better when placed in the sole custody of their mothers.

This paradigm of thought shifted again after experts and lawmakers discovered that custody for fathers was worthy of equal credence. The legal system began to understand that, in many cases, children benefited most from having both parents in their lives growing up. Many family courts still hold the belief, however, that the primary caregiver during a marriage should remain the primary caregiver after a divorce.

As a result of this view on custody for fathers and mothers, moms are still awarded custody in seventy percent of all child custody cases. Joint custody for fathers and mothers is awarded about twenty percent of the time. Family law statistics show that sole custody for fathers is awarded less than ten percent of the time. Statistics from 1991 indicate that forty percent of all child custody cases allowed no custody for fathers, barring them from both visitation and access rights.

Currently, family law judges will award custody rights contingent with the best interest of the children involved. Sole or joint child custody for fathers will be awarded when a judge determined that the child would benefit most from that type of custody arrangement. Joint custody for fathers and mothers allows each parent to share rights and responsibility for the child(ren) as set forth in a parenting plan. A parenting plan will detail the rights of each parent with regards to who will make the major decisions affecting the child, who the child will live with, where the child will spend his/her weekends, holidays, summers, etc, and other legal and physical custody issues.

There are a number of factors that the family court will evaluate to determine custody for fathers and mothers. The family court will often hear the testimony of children at any age, though special discretion is applied when younger children are involved. In addition to the wishes of the child the court will often entertain testimony from a psychologist who has evaluated the child custody case. This expert will base the recommendation on any or all of the following: history of abuse or neglect, past parenting history, household stability, time available to dedicate to raising a child, personal behaviors, and other relevant factors.

Custody for fathers can be an uphill battle when the family court system automatically favors maternal custody rights. To locate a divorce lawyer in your metro area click into your state below.

Man i wrote a lot cause i know all about it