3 Strategies To Know You've Picked The Right Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to endure the court system, especially if you lack confidence with your legal team. Listed below are three important methods to realize that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Concentrate On Your Type Of Case The law is frequently tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. When you want an attorney, try to find one that relates to the challenge you're facing. Regardless of whether a relative or friend recommends you utilize a company they understand, once they don't possess a focus that's comparable to your case, keep looking. As soon as your attorney is an expert, specifically in the problem you're facing, you realize you've hired the right choice. 2. The Lawyer Includes A Winning Record Based on the circumstances, it might be tough to win an instance, specifically if the team working for you has little to no experience. Try to find practices which may have won numerous cases that apply to yours. Although this is no guarantee which you case is going to be won, it provides you with a far greater shot. 3. They Listen And Respond In case the attorney you've chosen takes enough time to listen for your concerns and answer your inquiries, you've probably hired the best one. Regardless how busy they are or how small your concerns seem from the perspective, it's essential that they react to you in a caring and timely manner. From the purpose of look at a regular citizen who isn't acquainted with the judicial system, court cases may be pretty scary you will need updates and to think that you're part of the solution. Some attorneys are just a lot better to you and the case than the others. Be sure you've hired the most suitable team for the circumstances, to actually can position the matter behind you as soon as possible. Faith inside your legal representative is step one to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
I Need An Employment Lawyers Help Please!?
How Can A Company Terminate Someones Employment Because The Employee Did Not File An Appeal With A Ltd Company When That Person Was Cleared To Go Back To Work(May-2012) For That Company By His Doctor And The Ltd Company Own Doctor That Flew Into To Meet And Test The Employee And Cleared Him To Return To Work? The Employee And His Doctor Notified The Company At Least 2 Different Times(May-August-2012) That The Employee Was Cleared To Return To Work. The Ltd Company Notified(May-2012) The Company That The Employee Was Fit To Return To Work
Also The Hr Department Set It Up So This Employee Could Also Look At The Various Other Job Openings This Company Had Open Through Their Private Intranet. This Employee Also Interviewed For Another Job(Jan-2013)With The Company While Still Waiting To Return To Work. So The Hr Rep From This Employees Plant Site Had To Approve The Employee To Be Able To Take A Test For Another Job. After Passing The Test, The Employee Was Called In For A Follow Up Interview For The Position. The Interview Went Good. Then 2 Weeks Later The Job Was Re Posted Again With Only Certain Employees Being Allowed To Apply This Time. So On Or Around March 21St, The Employee Received A Letter Stating That His Employment Had Been Terminated On Or About March15, 2013 Because No Appeal Was Filed With The Ltd Company To Stay On Ltd. Why Would The Employee File An Appeal When He Was Cleared By 2 Doctors To Be Able To Return To Work. March 18Th, 2013 Would Have Been The 11Th Year Of Employment. I Need A Lawyer To Help With This And That Is Not Afraid To Stand Up For The Little Guy. What Are My Options? What Can Be Done In This Case? This Employee Lost Enjoyment Of Life And Was To Ashamed To Go Out And Take The Chance Of Somebody Asking About His Employment And Having To Explain How He Was Terminated For Not Filing An Appeal. A Loss Of Income Of A $31/Hr Job Plus Health Benefits Which Was All Lost. And The Company Has Hired People For The Same Position That They Terminated This Employee For. How Do Companies Get Away With Doing This? He Had To Sell His Home And Move Out Of State And Back In With Relatives Just To Be Able To Survive.
Is There Actually A Law Firm Out There That Actually Cares About The Individual And The Rights We Are Losing Everyday? Please Try And Help Me Out With A Solution.
If you want a labor lawyer (employment specialist) to represent an emloyee, they exist. Plenty. Hire an attorney to represent you.
It seems there might be separate legal issues you have going on here.
1) Long term disability
2) Termination of employment
Let's see if I follow.
May 2012 - Employee was cleared to return to work
Jan. 2013 - Employee applied for other jobs
March 2013 - Latest time employee could appeal decision to end long term disability. thus, the LTD payments ended.
March 2013 - Employee was terminated, retroactive to (effective on) the date the LTD appeal rights expired.
Between May 2012 and March 2013, I'm not sure from this narrative waht the employee was doing on the job, if anything.
Generally, it seems that employees and employers have different rightrs:
* An employee with LTD insurance has the right to get paid while unable to work for an extended period of time. This is governed by the terms of the LTD insurance plan. The employee is entitled to the terms, which should spell out the terms of appeal of the decision to end Long Term Disability payments.
* An employer needs to fill a job with someone to do the work. The employer does not have to keep the job unfilled, waiting for an employee out on LTD.
* Job duties need to be performed by somebody.
* When the employee returns to work from LTD, they might not have a job to return to. Often.
* Some employees are only able to do light duty jobs. Employers might not have those jobs, and can terminate the employment.
* The employee might be lucky enough to qualify for a different job with the employer. However, they compete for the open positions, against other candidates. Someone else might be considered better suited for the job(s) that open up.
* Being cleared to return to work does not mean an employee was terminated because they did not file an appeal. They might have been terminated WHEN they did not file an appeal. * The termination letter might have chosen the end of employment as the last date the employee was allowed to appeal a decision on long term disability.
* LTD appeal - I don't know the insurance plan terms; it's not my plan.
Please, seek the advice of a labor lawyer who sides with employees They exist. Look up "labor lawyer". Make sure they represent employees, not employers. Yes, they exist. I worked with dozens long ago for a labor law agency.
You need a labor lawyer to figure this out, if you want to hire one.
"Labor lawyer" or employee relations attorney are the names of specialists representing either employers or employees. You want to make sure you get one specializing in employees rights. Get an opinion; it might be a free consultation.
However, your date of appeal has passed.
Being cleared to return to work doe not mean that your job remains open while you are on long term disability.
You might not have your old job open to return to.
The employer might not be required to keep the old job open.
The employer might have had to replace you while you were disabled.
The employer might not have to return you to your old position.
The employer might not have another position for which you are the best candidate.
As A Attorney, How Many Years Of Law School Would You Have To Complete And Have Anyone Heard Of A Malpractice Attorney ??? What Is Their Career ???
I've been an attorney for more than eighteen years; so my advice might be based on outdated information. When I was researching law schools to determine which to attend, there were a couple which did not absolutely require applicants to have bachelor's degrees.
One might be able to complete law school in two and one-half years by attending summer school; however, I recommend not doing that unless you have a very special and overriding need to finish law school as quickly as possible. In all likelihood, you will benefit more by working in the law during the summer rather than attending summer school.
It is not absolutely necessary to attend or graduate from law school. There are a couple of states, one of which is Washington, which have clerkship programs: one trains to be an attorney by apprenticing ones self to a judge or practicing attorney. The downside is that you might not be able to practice law in a state which doesn't have a clerkship program because such states require graduation from an A.B.A. accredited law school for admission to the bar.
There are many malpractice attorneys. They practice in the area of professional malpractice. Probably most of them practice in medical malpractice, suing or defending physicians; however, there are many who also practice in legal malpractice, suing or defending attorneys.
Will I Need A Trademark Attorney?
I Have Received Notice From The Uspto That I Have To Agree To A Disclaimer That Part Of My Trademark Name Can'T Be Protected Because Of Geographical And Color Descriptives. However, I Disagree Because These Descriptives Have Acquired Secondary Meaning. They Are Meant To Be Political Ideologies That I Expect To Gain Momentum.
One Of The Descriptive Words Is Usa And The Other Is Green. Obviously, The Color Green Can Apply To Many Things Such As Money Or Even Turf Or Grass, But Most Everyone Today Understands &Quot;Green&Quot; To Be Association With The Green Party Concerned With The Welfare Of The Environment. Certain Political Parties Or Positions Have Become Associated With Different Colours At Different Times.
I Feel Strongly About This, But Will I Need An Attorney To Appeal This Decision, Or Can I Just State All Of The Above Myself In My Appeal?
I guarantee that the USPTO is aware of the environmental connotations of the color green. So if you write them a layperson letter saying "Yeah, but green is associated with the Green Party," they're going to write back and say, basically, "Tell us something we don't know. Appeal denied."
The bottom line is that you don't need an attorney to appeal the decision, but you probably need an attorney to be successful at appealing the decision.
If it's even possible. I don't know all the details of your case, but basically, if you want to be "USA Green Alliance," the USPTO is saying that if some "save the parks" association wants to call themselves the "USA Green Organization," you won't be able to sue for trademark infringement: "USA" and "Green" are not words any one group can lay claim to.
I doubt even a high-priced attorney would be able to change that.
By the way, this is exactly why "Kentucky Fried Chicken" now only goes by the name "KFC." The USPTO said "No, you don't own the state of Kentucky, you don't own the concept of fried chicken, and therefore, that's not a valid trademark. Anyone who lives in Kentucky is allowed to sell fried chicken under the name "Kentucky Fried Chicken."
Would You Recommend Being A Lawyer As A Profession?
What Have Been Your Experiences In The Field?
Also, Being Blunt, Is Law School Boring? How Did You Find It?
Learn to starve........law sucks...........unless you go to a tier one law school and Daddy owns a law firm........tons of lawyers and tons on the way.......with no jobs available.........no way to pay off your student loans........go into a health field and never want for a good paying job anywhere.........
What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Having A Legal Will And A Living Will?
A legal will is to make sure your possessions go to your family, friends, charity choices, etc. If you don't have one your stuff could end up going to the state, which would be a big waste. The living will is to make sure you get the medical care you want even if you aren't able to make the decisions at the time. For example, if you don't want to be kept alive artificially that would be in the living will and doctors have to follow it even though you can't tell them at the time. The disadvantages to a legal will would only be if you made decisions that made your family unhappy. And the living will I guess the only problem would be if you changed your mind but forgot to change the living will and then couldn't tell the doctor your new wishes. But that would be a pretty extreme case. Mostly they are good things to have.
Do Criminal Defense Attorneys Have To Defend Someone They Know Is Guilty?
If The Criminal Tells You That &Quot;Yeah, I Did It&Quot;, What Is A Public Defender To Do? Will Private Defense Attorneys Still Take Their Client'S Cash? How Do These People Sleep At Night? I Guess Somebody Has To Defend Them, Right?
A public defender has to defend the client regardless. A private attorney has some wiggle room, but they must ask the Court for permission to withdraw and the Court will not let them do it if it will prejudice the client (for example, if the jury has already seen the lawyer and will wonder what happened or if the client can't get a new attorney in time to move the case along).
This is one reason why I couldn't do defense worked, though I have worked in a couple of different prosecutor's offices. Defense attorneys are often motivated by a belief in the principals that everyone is entitled to a zealous defense and only by forcing the prosecutor to prove their case, dotting every i and crossing every t, are they able to protect the ones who actually are innocent, and therefore their actions protect us all.
That said, defense attorneys don't always want to win. I've heard about defense attorneys who, after their clients were found guilty, said "good, he did it." But they still put forth a defense and did their best for their client as long as they were obligated.
Also, a defense attorney is still an office of the Court, like all lawyers. As such, they have certain obligations. For example, they cannot suborn perjury. They can't put someone on the stand and participate in what they know will be a lie. If a defense attorney KNOWS the defendant did it, the defense attorney cannot put them on the stand to say they didn't. However, the defendant has a right to testify in his own defense, so if the defense attorney knows the defendant did it, the defendant might testify, but the attorney won't participate. He'll either say nothing or ask simply "then what happened?" and let the client talk. That's why defense attorneys generally don't ask the defendant if they did it. They don't want to know, it makes their job harder. They only want to know what can be proven. They are obligated, though, to believe their clients against all possible doubt, even if it isn't reasonable. But if they truly know the client is guilty, they can't lie to the Court.