Finding An Experienced Lawyer Whatever your legal needs are you will find that there are countless lawyers in the area that advertise which they specialize in your type of case. This can make the process of finding one with a lot of experience a bit of a challenge. However, if you follow the tips below it will be easy to limit your quest on the right one in almost no time. The first task is to generate a set of the lawyers that are listed in your neighborhood specializing in your needs. While you are which makes this list you ought to only include those that you may have a good vibe about according to their advertisement. After that you can narrow this list down through taking a little while evaluating their website. There you should certainly find just how many years they have been practicing and some general information regarding their success rates. At this stage your list should have shrunken further to people which you felt had professional websites as well as an appropriate level of experience. You need to then make time to lookup independent reviews of each attorney. Make sure to browse the reviews rather than just depending on their overall rating. The information inside the reviews will give you a solid idea of the way they interact with their clients and the length of time they invest into each case they are working on. Finally, you will want to talk with at the very least the final three lawyers that have the credentials you are interested in. This gives you enough time to genuinely evaluate how interested they are in representing you and the case. It can be imperative that you follow most of these steps to ensure that you find someone which includes the best measure of experience to obtain the ideal outcome.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Which Career Is Better: Lawyer / Medical Specialist / Journalist?
Which Career Is Better: Lawyer / Medical Specialist / Journalist?
Please Consider The Salary, Outlook On Future, Years Of Schooling, The Level Of Stress, Un/Employment Rates. I Need Good Answers.
I Am Interested In All These Areas.
By The Way, The Medical Areas I'M Thinking Of Are Opthalmology Or Neurology.
Well as cliched as it may seem, you should focus on doing what you love or enjoy first when considering these three jobs, rather then the criteria you mentioned.
That being said here are my opinions:
lawyer - high pay tends to equal high stress. The long term employment outlook is good, but it seems to be taking longer and longer to pay off those loans for law school. Of course if you are the number one student in a top tier school, then you should be fine.
medical specialist - not sure here, so I'll skip it.
journalist - this one is tough. Thanks to the internet, this field is going through some massive changes. The formerly typical type of journalism jobs, print, is disappearing. Yet the appetite for news, clips, etc. delivered through electronic news sources is growing. I'd look for a program that taught you journalism skills but specialized in new media means for getting your message to the people.
Can Law Enforcement Officers Give Legal Advice To Suspects?
If Not Can They Get In Legal Trouble? I Heard They Can'T Give Legal Advice.
Only licensed attorneys can give legal advice. Police are not usually lawyers, therefore they can't give legal advice. Also, it is the role of the police officer to investigate the crime and gather evidence that is turned over to the state's attorney to determine if charges will be brought. It would be a conflict of interest for the police officer to give any kind of legal advice in those circumstances.
I Am Going To Become A Lawyer What Do I Need To Do For This Career Choice?
I Want To Be A Lawyer In New Zealand. I'M 15 And I Need To Know What Subjects I Need For Next Year. You Know For University Entrance. Also If You Think A Certain University Is Best Please Tell Me. Thanks.
Got to figure out what you want to specialize in.
Types of Law and the Lawyer you can be and not limited to:
Construction Law, Procedural law, Substantive law, Tort law, Federal Law, State Law, Local Law, Private Practice Law, Public Interest Law, Government Counsel, Corporate Counsel, Administrative Law, Civil Litigation, Corporate and Commercial, Constitutional, Property Law, Real Estate, Tax Law, Labor Law, Employment Law
Auto Accident Lawyer
Car Accident Lawyer
Medical Malpractice Lawyer
Nursing Home Lawyer
Personal Injury Lawyer
Social Security Lawyer
Wrongful Death Lawyer
Figure out which one you enjoy and would like to specialize in and find out where there is a demand, how much you make, how much you need to work in order to make a living, how much it will cost you to go to school to get that degree for that specialized area.
As for what you can study. Probably any of these topics:
Lots to choose from! Good luck! :)
If You Are Cleared By A Jury And An Investigation Why Can You Be Retried By A Wrongful Death Charge?
Because a grand jury investigates CRIMINAL charges.... and a wrongful death charge is a CIVIL suit...
So... Suppose Mr. S killed his ex-wife, but was acquitted of criminal charges by finding of a jury. The family of the deceased could sue Mr. S in civil court, for the wrongful death of their daughter. Of course, it would not be for the purpose of punishing him by sending him to prison... it would be about money. He would be ordered to pay them monetary damages (cash... or proceeds from book sales) to compensate them for the loss of their daughter.
This is all possible because the burden of proof in a criminal trial is "beyond a reasonable doubt"... and the burden of proof in a civil trial is "by a preponderance of the evidence." (which just means there is more evidence that indicates he did it than there is that indicates he didn't do it.) He can't be sent to prison in a civil trial, but will be ordered to pay them for the loss of her life.
In cases where this happens... the criminal jury didn't feel there was proof beyond a reasonable doubt.. meaning overwhelming proof to the point you can't reasonably doubt he's guilty... but the civil jury or court felt there was more evidence that pointed to his guilt than his innocence.
Pre Law And Legal Studies?
Are Pre-Law And Legal Studies The Same Thing?
I am a law school graduate and have practiced law.
Pre-law and legal studies differ.
Pre-law describes an educational objective and is not a major. Law schools accept any academic major.
Legal studies is a rather recently developed major whose objective is to teach students something about the law and the legal process. Sometimes it is aimed toward the education of people who seek careers as paralegals. It is not a good major for preparation for law school as it is considered too easy by many law school admission deans and its method of instruction differs from the unique instructional method of law schools.
The best pre-law majors include history, which teaches critical reading, thinking, and writing skills which are similar to those used in the study and practice of law,
and math and engineering which teach analytical thinking and are known for their difficulty.
My Husband Is Asking For More Visitation With His Son. His Sons Mother (They Were Never Married) Will Agree To None Of His Terms. They Are Going To Court Next Month. What Sort Of Things Would Be Pertinent To His Case Vs Thing Pertinent In Custody Battles? Since The Original Arrangement, My Husband I Met, Got Married, Have A Son, Bought A House, Cover My Stepsons Health Insurance.
She Sleeps Around And Literally Has Brought My Stepson Into Bed With Her Random Boyfriends (While Still Living Under Her Parents Roof!), Uses My Stepson As A Pawn Against My Husband, Has Discussed Animosity Issues Between Her And Myself/My Husband With My Stepson (Who Is 4).
All These Things Are Important In Custody Changes, But Are They Important In Just Visitation Changes? What Sort Of Documentation Would Be Important (Reference Letters In Our Favor From Daycare Provider? Character References)?
What Sort Of Things Get Discussed During Court In Visitation Changes?
the practical impact of the visitation, including:
* the day care and/or school schedules of each child;
* the extracurricular activities of each child, and/or medical, psychological, or dental appointments requiring scheduling and transportation;
* the distance each child would travel for visitation;
* the availability of transportation to each parent and the willingness and ability of each parent to share in the obligation of transportation for the purpose of visitation;
* the work schedules of each parent;
In determining whether to grant visitation rights in establishing a specific visitation schedule, and in determining other visitation matters, the court must consider all of the following factors:
1. The prior interaction and interrelationships of the child with his/her parents, siblings, and other relatives, and with the person who requested companionship or visitation if that person is not a parent, sibling, or relative of the child;
2. The geographical location of the residence of each parent and the distance between those residences;
3. The child's and parents' available time, including, but not limited to, each parent's employment schedule, the child's school schedule, and the child's and the parents' holiday and vacation schedule;
4. The age of the child;
5. The child's adjustment to his home, school, and community;
6. If the court has interviewed the child in chambers, regarding the wishes and concerns of the child as to visitation by the parent who is not the residential parent or companionship, as to a specific visitation schedule, or as to other visitation matters, the wishes and concerns of the child, as expressed to the court;
7. The health and safety of the child;
8. The amount of time that will be available for the child to spend with siblings;
9. The mental and physical health of all parties;
10. Each parent's willingness to reschedule missed visitation and to facilitate the other parent's visitation rights;
11. In relation to visitation by a parent, whether either parent previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to any criminal offense involving any act that resulted in a child being an abused child or a neglected child; whether either parent, in a case in which a child has been adjudicated an abused child or a neglected child, previously has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive or neglectful act that is the basis of the adjudication; and whether there is reason to believe that either parent has acted in a manner resulting in a child being an abused child or a neglected child;
12. Whether the person, in a case in which a child has been adjudicated an abused child or a neglected child, previously has been determined to be the perpetrator of the abusive or neglectful act that is the basis of the adjudication; whether either parent previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a charge domestic violence and, if so whether he/she caused physical harm to the victim in the commission of the offense; and whether there is reason to believe that the person has acted in a manner resulting in a child being an abused child or a neglected child;
13. Whether the residential parent or one of the parents subject to a shared parenting decree has continuously and willfully denied the other parent his or her right to visitation in accordance with an order of the court;
14. Whether either parent has established a residence or is planning to establish a residence outside this state;
15. Any other factor in the best interest of the child.