4 Approaches To Help Your Lawyer Allow You To If you want a legal professional for any reason, you must work closely with them in order to win your case. Regardless of how competent these are, they're likely to need your help. Listed here are four important approaches to help your legal team help you win: 1. Be Totally Honest And Up Your lawyers need and expect your complete cooperation - whatever information you're planning to reveal to them. Privilege means anything you say is saved in confidence, so don't hold anything back. Your legal team has to know everything in advance - most importantly information the other side could check out and surprise you with later. 2. Provide Meticulous Records Keep a regular and factual account of information associated with your case. Whether it's witnesses or payments being made, provide your attorneys with the data they should help them to win. 3. Appear Early For Those Engagements Not be late when you're appearing before a court and prevent wasting the attorney's time, too, by being punctually, every time. In reality, because you may have to discuss very last minute details or even be extra prepared for the way it is you're facing, it's a good idea to arrive early. 4. Demonstrate That You Have Your Act Together If you've been arrested for any sort of crime, it's important so as to convince a legal court that you simply both regret the actions and are making strides toward improving your life. As an example, if you're facing a DUI, volunteer for any rehab program. Be sincere and associated with the community the judge is presiding over. Working more closely with your legal team increases your odds of absolute success. Try this advice, listen closely to how you're advised and ultimately, you must win your case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
Question About Lonestar Legal Aid?
I Am Low Income And Need To Take Legal Action.What Services Do Lonestar Legal Aid In Texas Offer?Is It Affordable For Low Income People?
Lonestar Legal Aid is one of 3 legal aid services in Texas. Lonestar serves mainly east Texas.
They handle only civil law cases, they are probibited from taking fee generating cases or criminal cases.
You basically apply for their services, they will verify you qualify based on your income, and then within a few weeks they will determine wether or not to take your case. Legal Aid services get hundreds of applications a week and just do not have the resources to help everyone.
Lone Star Legal Aid is at www.lonestarlegal.org they should have monthly clinics throughout the counties they serve.
Business Law Question On Due Process..Please Help!?
11. A Law Is Passed That Bans “The Wearing Of Such Outlandish Clothing That It Causes A Public Distraction.” Most Likely, This Law Would Be Challenged On The Basis Of:
A. Substantive Due Process
B. Procedural Due Process
C. Commerce Clause
D. Equal Protection
I Think The Answer Is Either A Or D..
A, Because Substantive Due Process Says That Law Should Be Clear And Not Overly Broad..
Or D, Because It Says That Everyone Should Be Protected Equally..
Im Confused, Please Help!
Due process says that law should be clear and not overly broad
The 14th Amendment has several clauses which are applied in different ways
Under substantive due process it is:
"No State shall deprive a citizen of LIBERTY without due process of law."
The emphasis is on liberty. When a law interferes with a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, the government must demonstrate the purpose of the law and how the law is tailored to achieving that purpose. Some rights are so fundamental that only a COMPELLING STATE INTEREST NARROWLY TAILORED to achieving that interest will survive. This is called STRICT SCRUTINY. Strict scrutiny is STRICT IN THEORY FATAL IN FACT, which means that it will almost never survive. e.g. a law that restricts someone's right to vote.
Procedural due process is
"No STATE shall DEPRIVE a citizen of LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY without DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
First it must be a state or government action. If the actor is a private company, there is no Procedural due process claim. Next there must be a deprivation, which means that some sort of entitlement must be taken away. If one was not entitled to it to begin with, there is no violation. Next it must be a deprivation of life or limb, liberty, or property or property interest. Finally, insufficient process to challenge the deprivation must have occured. e.g. A welfare board determines that a family no longer qualifies for section 8 housing and evicts them from their home without warning.
The Commerce clause does not deal with the 14th amendment, but Article I of the Constitution. It give congress the power to regulate commerce between the many states. In this case it is the Federal government, and the action must affect commerce between the states or have an AGGREGATE EFFECT on commerce. e.g. cultivation of marijuanna for medical use affects illicit marijuanna use throughout the country. Additionally, a state cannot pass laws which SUBSTANTIALLY INTERFERE WITH INTERSTATE COMMERCE. This is known as the dormant commerce clause.
Equal Protection is
"No State shall deprive a citizen...of EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS." In this case, there is a classification of two distinct groups which are SIMILARLY SITUATED. One is disadvantaged. Again, a state or the federal government must demonstrate the purpose of the law and how that law is tailored to achieving that end. First, you must ask, does the law make a classification? If so, is that classification based on gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, status as an illegitimate child, or alien? When the classification is based on one of the above except gender, the government must show that the classification was based on a COMPELLING STATE INTEREST NARROWLY TAILORED TO ACHIEVING THAT INTEREST. Once again this is strict in theory and fatal in fact. Classifications based on race, for instance will almost always fail. e.g. segregating inmates in a prison according to race because of racial gangs. When the classification is based on gender the law must be based on AN IMPORTANT GOVERMENT INTEREST CLOSELY TAILORED TO ACHIEVING THAT INTEREST. This is intermediate scrutiny. Otherwise, the law must be RATIONALLY RELATED TO ACHIEVING A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT INTEREST, which is not very hard to demonstrate, but such laws can be struck down if they are based on animus towards a group. e.g. laws that prohibit the mentally handicapped from living in a residential housing zone for no good reason would not face muster.
To answer your question:
In approaching your question, you must look to see Is there a classification? That might be people who wear outlandish clothing vs. other people. The classification is not based on gender, race or ethnicity, so not much of a challenge under equal protection. Does the law involve a fundamental right? To dress as you wish is a freedom of expression, so this could involve the 1st Amendment. It could be substantive due process, but the speech does not appear to be protected. If the clothing's purpose was political, religious, or aritistic, it may be better. Does the action affect interstate commerce? It could affect retailers of outlandishing clothing because no one would like to buy the clothing if it is illegal. Because this deals with commerce more directly, it is probably not a good challenge. Is this a State action that deprives a person of property without due process? It is a law, so it is state action, and it deprives a person of their ability to use their property. The vagueness of what "outlandish" clothing means could implicate due process. Part of due process is that you know how the laws will affect you a head of time. When the law is overly broad, it has a CHILLING EFFECT on legal behavior, because no one wants to get arrested.
If you think that a freedom of expression is implicated here, then it is (a). If you think that people are being deprived of their property rights to wear outlandish clothing, then it is (b). For this reason, (a) is a stronger answer I believe. Good attorneys would sue under a, b, and d.
What Signs Do Police Officers Look For When Determining If An Individual Has Been Driving Under The Influence?
Of Alcohol? Also, What Kind Of Tests Do Police Officers Use To Determine Just How Drunk The Individual Is?
If an officer suspects OUIL because of the manner in which the subject is driving the car, he/she follows the vehicle and makes certain observations: steadiness of steering, crossing center line 3 or more times, too slow,or too fast, windows down in winter for example..
That type of driving behavior establishes probable cause to pull the vehicle over. The next thing is to simply ask the driver if he/she has been drinking and note the answer. Often the driver will admit to two or three beverages. Then the officer explains why he pulled the driver over and asks him/her to step out of the vehicle. All the while the subjects movement and speech are carefully observed and noted.
Then follows the field sobriety tests while someone certified on the Breathalyzer is en route with it. Alphabet backwards, stand on one foot while touching your nose, walk a straight line, etc. One thing leads to another as one indicator opens the door for further investigation as probable cause is established.
Since alcohol is excreted by the lungs, the most definitive simple test is analysis of the excreted breath which is reported numerically and establishes an absolute as to how intoxicated the subject is. The suspect may request a blood alcohol level instead in which case is transported to the local ER to have blood obtained and tested. All this evidence is compiled to present a solid case.
Texas Mesothelioma Lawyers?
Who Can Tell Me The Best Texas Mesothelioma Lawyers
Stay up late and watch TV. Those ambulance chasers are all over late night TV.
What Is A Satirical Solution For Drinking And Driving Laws?
My English Class Read &Quot;A Modest Proposal&Quot; By Jonathan Swift. In His Article, He Satirized The Problem Of Overpopulation In Ireland. His Solution Was To Eat Babies.
Now I Have To Write My Own Satire Paper.
I'M Writing About Drinking And Driving Laws. Any Help?
Drink more and reduce the population
The Spoof : Drinking Age Lowered To Eleven funny satire story
31 Aug 2008 ... Disgraced College President to Head Coalition To Lower Drinking Age! 30 August
08. Massive Changes in the Alcohol Laws by 2010. 27 August 08 ...
The Spoof : Massive Changes in the Alcohol Laws by 2010 funny ...
27 Aug 2008 ... Massive Changes in the Alcohol Laws by 2010 : Self extinguishing cigarettes ...
TheSpoof.com - funny satire articles and news stories Always ...
California Bans Alcohol in Bars > The LaLa Times: California ...
In a sweeping reform bill, the California state legislature passed a law
prohibiting the serving of ... No-drinking regulations follow on the heels of no
-smoking in bars. ... All stories are fictional, satirical and downright parodic
Satirical Essay on Drinking and Driving Essay
An essay or paper on Satirical Essay on Drinking and Driving. ... If you have a
chance to escape the law, put the pedal to the metal because they usually ...
Plenty of choice at these sites.
California Family Laws: Custody Battles...?
So A Girl Of Interest Lives In Ca, And She And A Guy Has A 9 Month Old Together, But They Are Not Married. In Looking Into Her Moving Over Here To The East Coast, We Wonder What Restrictions We Will Be Facing With Her And Her Son. She Was Once Given Advise That She Could Move Over Here Before Custody Is Decided Without Problem, And That Would In Fact Play In Her Favor For Winning Full Custody... That Sounds Bogus, But Who Really Knows? I Hope That You May. Besides That Scenario, How Should Things Play Out For A Successful Move Over Here To The East Coast?
If there is already a custody case in progress, then moving out of state, especially on a whim, could end up being very expensive, financially, and could cause her to lose custody of the child. Judges/courts do not like it when people do that, and they can get vindictive within the scope of the law. And, she'll need to fly back and forth for hearings, and since she moved, she may have to pay for *all* transportation for the child for visitation. She could also face charges of custodial interference.
I do have a question though - how well do you know this person? Do you know her personally, as in "in real life" or just from a computer and phone calls? If this is the case, then be very, very, very careful if she is asking you to support the move - it could be a scam.
If this is above board, then a move from the west coast to the east coast should not be an issue - just rent a U-haul and move the stuff; it'll probably take about 3 days of driving and cost about a grand if you do it yourself.