3 Strategies To Know You've Picked The Correct Lawyer It's pretty intimidating to endure the legal court system, particularly if you lack confidence with your legal team. Listed below are three important ways to recognize that you've hired the proper lawyer: 1. They Focus On Your Kind Of Case Legislation is frequently tricky which requires specialists to tackle the tough cases. If you want a lawyer, search for individual who handles the issue you're facing. Even if a member of family or friend recommends you use a strong they are aware, once they don't have got a focus that's much like your case, keep looking. When your attorney is undoubtedly an expert, especially in the hassle you're facing, you realize you've hired the right choice. 2. The Lawyer Carries A Winning Record Dependant upon the circumstances, it can be difficult to win an instance, specifically if the team working for you has virtually no experience. Look for practices which may have won numerous cases that apply to yours. While this is no guarantee that you simply case will be won, it will give you a far greater shot. 3. They Listen And Respond In case the attorney you've chosen takes the time to hear your concerns and answer your inquiries, you've probably hired the right choice. Regardless how busy they can be or how small your concerns seem off their perspective, it's crucial that they respond to you within a caring and timely manner. From the point of take a look at a regular citizen who isn't informed about the judicial system, court cases could be pretty scary you want updates and to feel as if you're area of the solution. Some attorneys are merely more desirable to you and the case as opposed to others. Make certain you've hired the best team for your personal circumstances, to ensure that you can position the matter behind you as quickly as possible. Faith within your legal representative is step one to winning any case.
ACTIONPages is your local directory publisher. Serving markets in Arizona, California, Washington, and Canada. ACTIONPages the best local choice for cost-effective advertising.
Some of the cites we server are,
I Need Automotive Legal Advice????? Please Help!?
Three Years Ago, I Had A Friend In Need. He Had Wrecked A New Car And Had No Insurance. I Told Him I Would Buy His Old Car From Him So He Would Have Some Money. I Gave Him Cash And He Said It Would Be A Couple Of Weeks Befor He Could Sign The Title Over To Me. So I Took The Car And Parked It At My House. A Few Days Later He Got In Some Trouble And Got Kicked Out Of The Military. All His Phones Were Turned Off And He Moved. I Got Back In Contact With Him A Few Months Ago And Asked About The Title For The Car. Ever Since Then He Has Been Avoiding Me. I'Ve Had This Car For Three Years And Can Do Nothing With It With Out The Title. What Can I Do???????
The best people to help you out with this problem, would be the Citizens Advice Bureau. Even a call to the D.V.L.A wouldn`t go amiss as they would be able to tell you if he is still the registered owner. Has he shown any interest in claiming the car back. I do feel for you because with friends like this, who needs enemies. GOOD LUCK.
How Much Does It Cost To Get A Lawyer?
For Civil Litigation
It's really between you and the lawyer. Most will negotiate to some extent, some just say "$400 an hour plus expenses".
You will have to contact a handful (3-5) and discuss your case with them, and go from there. Nobody can give you an actual number here.
Family Law - Grandparent Rights When Legal Custody Is Between Mother And Father?
I Would Like To Apologize Firsthand At The Length Of This, And Secondly Because I Had Originally Posted This Question Under Family At First (Meant To Add To Legal)
Long Story Short - After Two Years Of Battling In Court. Father And I Now Share 50/50 Custody Of Our Son.
Father Has Decided He Doesn'T Want To Have Anything To Do With His Son Other Than The Odd Visit - So Son Lives With His Paternal Grandparents During The Fathers Legal Noted Time.
During The Battle The Interim Order Said Father Had 60% Mother (Self ) Had 40% Custody. Again Child Lived With His Grandparents During Fathers Time.
Father Did Not Pay Support (Even Though He Makes Twice The Amount Of Income I Had). Grandparents Say He Will Never Pay Support Regardless Of What Is Done Because They Have Him.
Even Though Child Lives With Grandparents, Father Still Has The Right To Deny My Wanting To Move My Son Near A School In My Vicinity (Court Documents Say Only Changes Can Be Made If Both Parents Agree). I Have Two Other Children, One Of Which Attends School In My Area, The Other Is An Infant Suffering From Health Issues And Cannot Be Brought Outside The Home For Long Periods Of Time Due To Immunity Challenges. To Bring My Son Back And Forth Between My Own Home And The School His Father Refuses To Agree To Move Him From Takes 4 -5 Hours Transit Time Total Daily (Whereas He... Or The Paternal Grandparents Have A Reliable Vehicle And Can Make The Round Trip In 30 Minutes Or Less).
Because Of This The Paternal Grandparents Now Take My Son During My Custodial Week To Assure He Is Getting Back And Forth To School Without Risking The Health/School Times Of My Other Two Children And To Avoid Being Charged With Neglect For The Inability To Even Get My Son To School. I Was Told That It Is My Own Problem That I Live Across The City Near My Family (Aka My Own Support) And That If I Want To Choose The School, I Need To Pick Up And Move To An Area By Them. Yet In Another Instance They Complained That I Was Instable For Moving So Often (3 Times In 2 Years Due To Circumstances Beyond My Control)
Now I'M Fighting For A Divorce (I'M Paying) And Father Refuses To Take Any Part, He Refuses To Pay Me Support, He Refuses To Attend A Mediation, Refuses To Attend The Mandatory Parenting After Seperation Course, And Refuses To Provide Me With His Home Address. There Is Only So Much That Can Be Done In Court Until His Cooperation Is Taken. Because I Have Access To The Father Via Email - A Divorce Cannot Be Completed Until He Takes Part (It Would Be Different If He Went Awol And No One Had Any Contact With Him Whatsoever). Yet He Wants The Divorce And Says He Will Only Sign Papers And Thats It.
The Grandparents Are Saying That If I Go After Him For Support (Which Is A Legal Part Of The Divorce, Both Father And I Have To Provide Legal Proof Of Our Income) They Will Report Me To The Government For Collecting Child Tax Benefits (Which Was Used To Pay For Daycare And City Transit Needed To Get Son Across School Prior To My Youngest Child'S Birth - Since My Son'S Father Refused To Pay Support To Provide Help With This).
The Paternal Grandparents Say That His Child Support Is Going To Them As They Take Him During The Weekdays. Yet My Lawyer Is Saying That The Grandparents Have No Rights And Are Only Glorified Babysitters (They Have No Custodial Rights).
So Are There Any Legal Lawyers Out There In The Alberta Area That Can Provide Some Input? Better Yet - Any Lawyers Willing To Take On A Pro-Bono Case To Help A Mother And Her Children Who Have Been Put Under Extreme Emotional And Physical Stress Due To This Whole Unfair Shebang? Legal Aid Only Provides 30 Hours Per Lawyer (I Am Now On My Last Lawyer - This Will Be 4) And They Can Only Provide A Limited Amount Of Support.
The Paternal Grandparents Lied Throughout The Entire Process Of Court Saying Son Was Staying With His Father And That I Was Fabricating This Information. Now By Email (Which I Have Forwarded To My Lawyer), The Grandmother Admitted That My Son Has Indeed Been Living With Them This Entire Time.
Why Am I Not Entitled To Gain Full Custody If The Father Does Not Want To Take Part In His Sons Life Other Than To Contradict What I Ask In Regards To Said Son To Make Everyones Life Miserable?
Grandparents Are Non-Custodial, So Do They Have The Right To Demand I Pay Child Support (Even Though I Have On Numerous Times Offered To Pay For Things, Which Was Denied And Told The Father Is Paying)?
Sorry It'S Just Been Confusing, Frustrating, And Extremely Stressful That I Have No Rights To My Son When The Father Doesn'T Want To Have Any Responsibilities. Grandparents Tried To Gain Custodial Rights By Trying To Get Me To Sign A Portion Of My Custody Up - Which Both My Lawyer And I Refused.
Unfortunately there are no Laws governing bad fathers yet, so even if the son does live with Grandparents during Dads alloted time, there is no law that says he cant and this doesnt mean he doesnt want his son. All this shows is Dad is a bad father and cant handle his son so allows Grandparents to take care of him during this period. Grandparents do NOT have any legal rights at all in custody proceedings which is too bad and wrong in itself but its the way the system is. So unless you can prove Dad is legally felony negligent, abusive, drug, mentally incompetent, etc, there really is very little you can do legally here especially if hes current on his support payments, if applicable. So Grandparents shouldnt even be involved in this at all here, but you should be thankful to them in that they are taking good care of your son when Dad is supposed to have him as he could be leaving him with a total stranger but then you would have a case then. Good luck
Needing An Attorney That Practices In Collective Labor Law. N. Tx. I Want To Take Action Against A Union.?
Misrepresentation By The Union On A Wrongful Discharge.
If you need an attorney that practices in Collective labor law, I will suggest you to take help from USALegalCare.com. They have got good Labor law attorneys. I am sure they will help you.
All the best
Should I Be Looking For A Lawyer?
I Need Some Legal Advice. Actually Any Advice Will Do. Im In A Situation. Im Pregnant And Currently Planning On Not Putting The Fathers Name On The Birth Certificate Because Hes Not Looking To Be Financially Responsible For The Baby And His Family Is Physically Abusive And Verbally Abusive In Which Case I Don'T Want My Baby To Experience That. Plus He Still Hasn'T Made It Clear To Me How Involved He Wants To Be And From Day One His Dad His Mom And Him Tried To Convince Me To Get Rid Of My Baby Such As Adoption And Abortion But My Hand Cannot Be Forced So Easily As I Am A Very Pig Headed Person With Very Strong Beliefs. Once They Realized That The Mother Who Is A Paralegal Acted As If She Had Always Wanted The Baby And Is Currently Harassing Me Through My Group Of Friends. Shes Harassing Them By Telling Them I Got Pregnant On Purpose And Shes Rude To Me. She Actually Told Me Once On The Phone That Since I Choose To Keep The Baby Her Son Who Got Me Pregnant Has Less Responsibility Then I Do. Then She Proceeded To Tell Me That I Should Give The Baby His Last Name. Right Now Im Preparing To Be A Single Mother And Preparing To Only Have My Name On The Certificate But I Know There Is A Chance That She Will Follow Up With A Fraternity Suite..My Question Is .. Should I Be Looking For A Lawyer And What Can I Do About The Harasment? So Far Ive Kept A Journal Of All The Stupid Crap Her And Her Son Does That Could Help Should I Be In A Legal Situation But Any Advice Could Really Help. Thank You!
I can't tell if you said you are a paralegal or the baby's grandmother is?
I am a paralegal, and there is one way to really hack her off if the grandmother is: File a complaint with the State bar association that someone is practicing law or giving legal advice without a license. They'll investigate her. :) hahahahah
BUT, to answer the main question, if you are not married to the father, you can put Daffy Duck on the birth certificate. He CANNOT force you to do so, neither can the hospital. Same goes for name. If they do try to file a paternity suit, it is their burden, they have to pay for the DNA test, etc., and also have to set up child support. That might scare them off.
I wouldn't rule out the possibility that the father or family members want to be a part of the baby's life sometime down the road. Don't give them reason to say you are denying them contact. Keep the line of communication open. But they CANNOT do anything legal without the Court's approval. Stand your ground.
What Are The Three Sources Of Criminal Law?
Common Law is based on God's law. Anytime someone is charged under the Common Law, there must be a damaged party. You are free under the Common Law to do anything you please, as long as you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. You have a right to make a fool of yourself provided you do not infringe on the life, liberty, or property of someone else. The Common Law does not allow for any government action which prevents a man from making a fool of himself. For instance, when you cross over the state lines in most states, you will see a sign which says, " BUCKLE YOUR SEAT BELTS - IT'S THE LAW. " This cannot be Common Law, because who would you injure if you did not buckle up? Nobody. This would be compelled performance. But Common Law cannot compel performance. Any violation of Common Law is a CRIMINAL ACT , and is punishable.
Equity Law is law which compels performance. It compels you to perform to the exact letter of any contract that you are under. So, if you have compelled performance, there must be a contract somewhere, and you are being compelled to perform under the obligation of the contract. Now this can only be a civil action - not criminal. In Equity Jurisdiction, you cannot be tried criminally, but you can be compelled to perform to the letter of a contract. If you then refuse to perform as directed by the court, you can be charged with contempt of court, which is a criminal action. Are our seatbelt laws, Equity Laws? No, they are not, because you cannot be penalized or punished for not keeping to the letter of a contract.
This is civil jurisdiction of Compelled Performance which also has Criminal Penalties for not adhering to the letter of the contract, but this only applies to International Contracts. Now we can see what jurisdiction the seatbelt laws (all traffic codes, etc) are under. Whenever there is a penalty for failure to perform (such as willful failure to file), that is Admiralty/Maritime Law and there must be a valid international contract in force.
However, the courts don't want to admit that they are operating under Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdictions, so they took the international law or Law Merchant and adopted it into our codes. That is what the Supreme Court decided in the Erie Railroad case - that the decisions will be based on commercial law or business law and that it will have criminal penalties associated with it. Since they were instructed not to call it, Admiralty Jurisdiction, they call it Statutory Jurisdiction.